Warbird Information Exchange

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this site are the responsibility of the poster and do not reflect the views of the management.
It is currently Mon Jun 23, 2025 10:29 am

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Classic Wings Magazine WWII Naval Aviation Research Pacific Luftwaffe Resource Center
When Hollywood Ruled The Skies - Volumes 1 through 4 by Bruce Oriss


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 10 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Sun Oct 09, 2016 6:24 am 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 24, 2004 7:14 pm
Posts: 1678
Location: Oslo, NORWAY
Can't remember seeing this video here before, so here it is. Lynn Garrison bellying in 44-74813 at Canastota, NY in 1961.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5l8WU-6kqnU

T J

_________________
Make my day, punk!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Oct 09, 2016 7:44 am 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 27, 2007 10:23 pm
Posts: 2347
Location: Atlanta, GA
Looked like he did a nice job.

_________________
"Take care of the little things and the big things will take care of themselves."


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Oct 09, 2016 10:09 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2005 12:51 am
Posts: 329
Serious question...I am not a pilot, have never been in such a situation, but I have often wondered why the pilots in some of these belly landings, doesn't shut the engine down before he makes contact with the ground? It would seem to me that a lot less damage could occur to the engine and or prop if this was done. Again, just curious.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Oct 09, 2016 10:22 am 
Offline

Joined: Sun Jan 03, 2010 9:51 pm
Posts: 151
[quote="Xrayist"]Serious question...I am not a pilot, have never been in such a situation, but I have often wondered why the pilots in some of these belly landings, doesn't shut the engine down before he makes contact with the ground? It would seem to me that a lot less damage could occur to the engine and or prop if this was done. Again, just curious.[/quote

In a single engine airplane, the propeller will continue to turn even though the engine is not developing power (there are exceptions like catastrophic engine failure in an aircraft with direct drive of the propeller) so just because the propeller is windmilling doesn't mean the engine isn't shut down.

There is a technique for bringing the prop to a stop that I've read about but it can have aerodynamic consequences.

In Multi-engine aircraft a propeller can be feathered to stop the rotation of the dead engine, although if you feathered both props before the landing you loose any chance of a go around and by shutting down your engines you may lose important systems like hydraulics.
Tom Bowers


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Oct 09, 2016 5:30 pm 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club

Joined: Tue Oct 02, 2012 7:26 pm
Posts: 2051
Location: Creemore Ontario Canada
Tom makes some really good points.
Another significant consideration, is the fact that you are carrying out an unusual maneuver already. The last thing you want to do is start adding in more unknown variables in to this equation. As much as people don't want bent metal, the most important thing is getting the occupants down and out safely.
Everything else is secondary.
The plane can be fixed!
In the case of this gear up landing, you are going to have a prop strike and a shock loaded engine regardless.
Fly it all the way through the crash!

Andy


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Oct 09, 2016 8:15 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2007 6:52 pm
Posts: 3413
Location: Wichita Falls, Texas, USA
This came up recently during an informal AAR by bystanders after a Baron gear-up landing I witnessed the aftermath of. One thing brought up was that the FAA looks very poorly on the idea of shutting down a working engine because of what has been said above - you remove your option to go around if something happens on short final. You take an emergency landing and turn it into a forced landing or crash, and that's not considered Good Airmanship.

As one of the guys said from his own experience having bellied in a plane - there's a reason you carry insurance. If you're going to have to use it, use it fully.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Oct 09, 2016 9:01 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Fri Nov 12, 2004 8:51 pm
Posts: 1068
Location: Illinois, USA
From Xrayist:Serious question...I am not a pilot, have never been in such a situation, but I have often wondered why the pilots in some of these belly landings, doesn't shut the engine down before he makes contact with the ground? It would seem to me that a lot less damage could occur to the engine and or prop if this was done. Again, just curious.

Good question...........
I have had a few P-51 'dead-stick landings. In each of these, there was enough air-speed turning the 'airscrew' to keeping it spinning. I did not concern myself with stopping the propeller in each case - obviously there was no need with gear down and a runway landing assured. Curiously, in one instance, once the aircraft came to a stop on the runway, the propeller came to a 'hard' stop that shook the airframe, as the internal engine damage seized the crank shaft yet the propeller was spinning on final approach and rollout.
V


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 10, 2016 10:07 am 
Offline
Been here a long time
Been here a long time

Joined: Sun May 02, 2004 1:16 am
Posts: 11324
Quote:
One of 75 Mustangs surplused by RCAF: July 27, 1961: Lynn Garrison experiences hydraulic failure and engine overheat, with low fuel on non-radio ferry flight from storage site at RCAF Station Picton, Ontario to Canastota, New York. Aircraft suffered minimal damage and now flies as N151BW Cripes A' Mighty


How does a hydraulic failure on a P-51 keep the main gear from coming down? The uplocks are mechanical!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 11, 2016 1:05 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Mar 18, 2007 3:17 pm
Posts: 343
Location: Between RAAF Uranquinty and RAAF Temora
The aeroplane on the ground at 0:45 almost looks like a P-51H. That couldn't be right, could it?

Cheers,
Matt

_________________
Matt Austin - playing with warbirds since the early 80s.

See my Lee-Enfield videos at - http://www.youtube.com/user/Jollygreenslugg


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 11, 2016 12:29 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!

Joined: Sun Nov 15, 2009 12:40 pm
Posts: 1471
Jollygreenslugg wrote:
The aeroplane on the ground at 0:45 almost looks like a P-51H. That couldn't be right, could it?

Cheers,
Matt


Nope, definitely a D model. (Or I suppose a K is possible but not likely.)


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 10 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 62 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group