Warbird Information Exchange

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this site are the responsibility of the poster and do not reflect the views of the management.
It is currently Sat Jun 28, 2025 12:54 pm

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Classic Wings Magazine WWII Naval Aviation Research Pacific Luftwaffe Resource Center
When Hollywood Ruled The Skies - Volumes 1 through 4 by Bruce Oriss


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 44 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3
Author Message
PostPosted: Mon Dec 12, 2016 3:07 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2012 12:46 pm
Posts: 543
Michel Lemieux wrote:
Manufacturer versus conversions.....pretty broad!

Who was responsible for the first DC-3 gunship conversions? Yes it did add ack-ack to the otherwise very civilian or military transport DC-3.


I think Fairchild, they did the conversions of T-28s to armed...and I believe the C-119 gunships as well. Seems like they were strapping guns on anything with wings over there during that time.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Dec 12, 2016 3:53 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 06, 2015 9:48 pm
Posts: 1102
Location: West Valley, Silicon Valley
Temco, while a military parts contractor, wasn't even an "airplane company" until they submitted a modified general aviation plane, the Globe Swift, as the Temco T-35 Buckaroo for the trainer contract (losing to the Beechcraft T-34 Mentor).

_________________
remember the Oogahonk!
old school enthusiast of Civiltary Warbirds and Air Racers


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Dec 12, 2016 5:29 pm 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2011 12:27 am
Posts: 5618
Location: Eastern Washington
Stephan Wilkinson wrote:
Quote:
And the U-2 started off as a "civilian" aircraft too!

But from a military manufacturer.



But recall that Lockheed started of as a strictly civil firm.....they didn't get into military aircraft until they sold the Hudson (a modified airliner) to the RAF.
They had a civil side: Connie and Tri-Star and their abortive attempt at GA SEL aircraft (not to mention the JetStar).

_________________
Remember the vets, the wonderful planes they flew and their sacrifices for a future many of them did not live to see.
Note political free signature.
I figure if you wanted my opinion on items unrelated to this forum, you'd ask for it.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 13, 2016 2:06 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!

Joined: Mon May 21, 2012 12:28 pm
Posts: 1200
Although you are painting a narrow window Stephen, you might also consider Basler and Marsh Aviation. Perhaps they don't meet your major player caveat, but further highlights the need to stay away from absolutes. Some significant conversions were also done in WWII, perhaps most famous being the Cheyenne tail turret on the B-17, which was done by an airliner depot.

Basler has done the turbine C-47's including the gunship BT-67.

Marsh did the Turbo Trackers and some impressive work on a variety of OV-10's. Seems the latest OV-10 did pretty well in a recent "trial" overseas.


Last edited by sandiego89 on Tue Dec 13, 2016 3:45 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 13, 2016 2:33 pm 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club

Joined: Wed May 05, 2004 3:45 pm
Posts: 2635
menards wrote:
Michel Lemieux wrote:
Manufacturer versus conversions.....pretty broad!

Who was responsible for the first DC-3 gunship conversions? Yes it did add ack-ack to the otherwise very civilian or military transport DC-3.


I think Fairchild, they did the conversions of T-28s to armed...and I believe the C-119 gunships as well. Seems like they were strapping guns on anything with wings over there during that time.


Air International in Miami did some(all?) the AC-47 conversions.

_________________
45-47=-2


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 13, 2016 6:06 pm 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2011 12:27 am
Posts: 5618
Location: Eastern Washington
Speaking of Fairchild...

Remember it armed AU-23s....Pilates Porters.

And while we're talking about Vietnam-era STOLs, would armed turbine Helio Couriers ...AU-24s count?

The courier was originally a civil airplane...though they did sell some to the USAF as U-10s.

_________________
Remember the vets, the wonderful planes they flew and their sacrifices for a future many of them did not live to see.
Note political free signature.
I figure if you wanted my opinion on items unrelated to this forum, you'd ask for it.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Dec 14, 2016 9:13 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2008 8:52 pm
Posts: 1216
Location: Hudson, MA
Bellanca built 40 Model 28-90 two seat aircraft that were intended for Republican Spain in the 1930s. They were never delivered. They looked like a 1930s racing plane but with king posts on the bottom of the fuselage for wire bracing.

_________________
"I can't understand it, I cut it twice and it's still too short!" Robert F. Dupre' 1923-2010 Go With God.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Dec 14, 2016 11:26 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 18, 2010 12:51 pm
Posts: 1185
Location: Chandler, AZ
John Dupre wrote:
Bellanca built 40 Model 28-90 two seat aircraft that were intended for Republican Spain in the 1930s. They were never delivered. They looked like a 1930s racing plane but with king posts on the bottom of the fuselage for wire bracing.


It WAS a 1930's racing plane.

OK, continuing the theme.

Beech 18 variants marketed pre-WWII as light bombers
Spartan Executive 7W-F fighter bomber
Spartan 8W Zeus - two seat fighter derived from above

_________________
Lest Hero-worship raise it's head and cloud our vision, remember that World War II was fought and won by the same sort of twenty-something punks we wouldn't let our daughters date.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Dec 15, 2016 2:16 pm 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2011 12:27 am
Posts: 5618
Location: Eastern Washington
I've heard of prewar Beech 18s being sold as ambulance planes for outfits like the Swedish AF, not sure I've ever heard of them as bombers, at least not from the factory.

_________________
Remember the vets, the wonderful planes they flew and their sacrifices for a future many of them did not live to see.
Note political free signature.
I figure if you wanted my opinion on items unrelated to this forum, you'd ask for it.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Dec 15, 2016 7:48 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 18, 2010 12:51 pm
Posts: 1185
Location: Chandler, AZ
JohnB wrote:
I've heard of prewar Beech 18s being sold as ambulance planes for outfits like the Swedish AF, not sure I've ever heard of them as bombers, at least not from the factory.


I didn't say anyone actually bought them as bombers, but they were marketed that way in factory literature

_________________
Lest Hero-worship raise it's head and cloud our vision, remember that World War II was fought and won by the same sort of twenty-something punks we wouldn't let our daughters date.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Dec 15, 2016 11:40 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 07, 2004 2:02 am
Posts: 4702
Location: Yucca Valley, CA
shrike wrote:
Beech 18 variants marketed pre-WWII as light bombers

Was that how the AT-11 was developed?

_________________
Image
All right, Mister Dorfmann, start pullin'!
Pilot: "Flap switch works hard in down position."
Mechanic: "Flap switch checked OK. Pilot needs more P.T." - Flight report, TB-17G 42-102875 (Hobbs AAF)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Dec 16, 2016 9:23 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 17, 2008 4:32 pm
Posts: 791
Location: Wiesbaden, Germany
Beechcraft very highly modified king airs in the RC-12 series.
The Vietnam era QU-22 Bonanzas modded A36's....
Not sure if this kind of thing is what you are asking for.

_________________
All I did was press this red button here...


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Dec 18, 2016 12:17 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2011 2:43 am
Posts: 322
Stephan Wilkinson wrote:
Quote:
Would the Howard 500 count?


No. I don't know of any Howard 500s that flew in combat, though certainly plenty of Lodestars did.


And... the CIA is civilian.
Chris...


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Dec 18, 2016 12:22 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2011 2:43 am
Posts: 322
On Mark re-engineered certain parts of a Douglas design. Just as Trans Florida did to the Mustang. Hardly does either make them the manufacturer of either warplane. For On Mark the Guppy was probably a bigger feat. No pun intended but for arguments sake.
Chris...


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 44 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 50 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group