This is the place where the majority of the warbird (aircraft that have survived military service) discussions will take place. Specialized forums may be added in the new future
Post a reply

Re:

Sun Jul 30, 2017 1:02 am

Error

Re: Douglas TBD Devastator

Sun Jul 30, 2017 4:23 am

Dude,

That's just plain mean!! :axe:

Mac

Re: Douglas TBD Devastator

Sun Jul 30, 2017 1:39 pm

We have to be careful with the name.
I caused a shock a few weeks back when I was corresponding with someone about a friend's recently completed project.
I said "His next project is TBD"...which got him excited.

I didn't say it WAS a TBD, rather I meant "to be determined".

Words can be tricky sometimes... :)

Re: Douglas TBD Devastator

Sun Jul 30, 2017 2:47 pm

Two more per Baugher:
0292 (VT-3) midair collision with 0373 Jan 13, 1940; 3 OK
0373 (VT-3) mid-air collision with 0292 20 miles E of Julian, CA Jan 13, 1940; 1 killed, 2 OK


At least one site has been located; is there enough wreckage for the Navy to start with?
http://www.aircraftwrecks.com/pages/tbd-1.htm

Re: Douglas TBD Devastator

Tue Aug 01, 2017 12:04 am

Article from a long time ago on the San Diego site.
Is more known about this one now?
http://www.warbirds-eaa.org/news/2011%2 ... Diego.html

Re: Douglas TBD Devastator

Tue Aug 01, 2017 5:56 pm

There was a thread about this aircraft several years ago which ended with a statement that it was in too bad a condition to recover. :cry:

Re: Douglas TBD Devastator

Tue Aug 01, 2017 6:32 pm

There was a thread that mentioned this aircraft several years ago which ended up with a statement that it was in too bad a condition to recover. :cry:

EDIT: This thread, page 2.
viewtopic.php?f=3&t=54084&p=537565#p537565

Re: Douglas TBD Devastator

Tue Aug 01, 2017 7:49 pm

With the ridiculous amount of scratchbuilding skill shops have these days, it's really too bad someone hasn't taken the initiative to build a TBD. Maybe we'll get to see one of the big name collectors put up the money to have one built some day.

Re: Douglas TBD Devastator

Wed Aug 02, 2017 11:31 am

WIXerGreg wrote:With the ridiculous amount of scratchbuilding skill shops have these days, it's really too bad someone hasn't taken the initiative to build a TBD. Maybe we'll get to see one of the big name collectors put up the money to have one built some day.


I've been told if you live long enough, you'll see it all.

Two B-29s flying?

Soviet warbirds? In the States?

Me 262 replicas?

20 years ago I would've told someone they were smoking crack if they thought they'd see any of these.

Yet here we are. Keep the dream alive!

Re: Douglas TBD Devastator

Wed Aug 02, 2017 2:07 pm

and maybe a P-66

Re: Douglas TBD Devastator

Wed Aug 02, 2017 2:31 pm

I'm wishing for a Boeing 314.

Re: Douglas TBD Devastator

Wed Aug 02, 2017 6:40 pm

I just found a Martin PBM Mariner seat at Oshkosh and bought it for a friend. He's building a collection of items. There's only one Mariner in existence and only one or two ever went on the civil register.
We've covered this topic before. Basically, try to find a data plate from a crash site. Scavenge every part possible from know crash sites. Put ads out that you are looking for TBD parts and items. Meanwhile, cross reference other Douglas aircraft from that era like the Dauntless, DC-2, DC-3, Dolphin, etc., etc.,
There's a lot of stuff sitting out there that people haven't listed or given up trying to sell. Wheels, tires, avionics, maybe start with the front cockpit.

Re: Douglas TBD Devastator

Wed Aug 02, 2017 7:22 pm

I'd sure love to see a TBD for sure, but I'm holding out for a Kingfisher on floats. And maybe a B-36.

Re: Douglas TBD Devastator

Wed Aug 02, 2017 10:52 pm

F7U-3 and a F4D (Skyray) in formation.......I'll hold up the first half of the bargain, somebody do the Skyray! :drink3:

Re: Douglas TBD Devastator

Thu Aug 03, 2017 10:14 am

Courier Sportster wrote:I'm wishing for a Boeing 314.


Funny that you mention this, but shortly after the 307 was restored for NASM, I visited the Resto facility for the Museum of Flight in Seattle and there was what was (apparently) serious talk at Boeing about building a 314, since they had a lot of expertise around and familiarity with the systems after the 307 restoration.

I'm guessing the bean counters nipped that in the bud.
Post a reply