Warbird Information Exchange

The basic difference is that the FM-2 had the 9-cylinder Wright R-1820 engine while the F4F had the Pratt & Whitney 14-cylinder R-1830.

Not sure it was any lighter, if so it was from the engine going from 14 cylinders to 9. The oil cooler moved in from the stub wing to the accessory section area.
The landing gear retract remained hand cranked, no electric motors. The flaps remained vacuum canister operated.



1. The Wildcat did not have hydraulics ( except the brakes). No provision for retract in the tail and with the F6F in production I doubt re-engineering the Wildcat tail wheel to retract was even a thought.

2. The spinner was removable and it probably wasn't worth the hassle of removing and reinstalling. The motor is a sealed unit anyway.

_________________
CraigQ

CraigQ - I had wondered why when Eastern improved the Wildcat with the FM-2 version, they hadn't approached the tail wheel not retracting. Thanks for the explanation.

Looks like during the war, the Grummans did not have spinners, yet most of the Easterns did. I've noticed that of the Easterns flying today, some have a spinner and some don't. Makes sense, since they aren't needed.

The FM-2 was about 450 lbs lighter, had more horsepower, climbed faster and actually had the best USN kill/loss ratio of any navy fighter in WW2 (32.4 to 1). It was also about 30 MPH faster than the F4F, and never served aboard big fleet carriers, just Jeeps (CVE's).
Check out 'if you owned an FM-2' thread in Nathans usaircraft.com site for last nights postings including navy performance comparisons charts-
An article about the flying Chevy in February 2014's Flight Journal that I used to quote specs from changed my opinion of the FM-2.

_________________
Don't make me go get my flying monkeys-

When restoring the Fighter factory FM-2 I really came to appreciate the little fighter, amazingly simple and easy to work on.

As far as Nathans site, I joined up once, last year I think. Didn't log back on for a little while and when I tried I got a message saying I was banned for some reason, can't remember what now. Sent a couple of emails to the admin contact but never got a reply. Oh well.

_________________
CraigQ

He had to put the site through some serious alterations including a server swapout, around mid year, and it took me a couple of E mails to Nathan to get my registration reinstated and working.

_________________
Don't make me go get my flying monkeys-

Images restored

_________________
Scott Rose
Editor-In-Chief/Webmaster
Warbirds Resource Group - Warbird Information Exchange - Warbird Registry

Be civil, be polite, be nice.... or be elsewhere.
-------------------------------------------------------
This site is brought to you with the support of members like you. If you find this site to be of value to you,
consider supporting this forum and the Warbirds Resource Group with a VOLUNTARY subscription
For as little as $2/month you can help ($2 x 12 = $24/year, less than most magazine subscriptions)
So If you like it here, and want to see it grow, consider helping out.



Thanks to everyone who has so generously supported the site. We really do appreciate it.

Follow us on Twitter! @WIXHQ

If FM-2s did I have the highest kill/loss ratio but weren't used on fleet carriers, is it possible that success came from its deployment, rather than superiority of the airframe?

Operating from CVEs, wouldn't it have faced a different enemy under different circumstances as opposed to fighters...of whatever type...operating from the larger fleet carriers. In other words, they may have had a greater likelihood of getting "easier" kills.

Examples might include aircraft from Atlantic operating CVEs, encountering Fw-200s during convoy escort cruises, or CVEs in the Pacific being utilized to intercept Japanese transports and scout aircraft away from the larger battles where CVs or land based fighters would have faced the Japanese "A team".

I'm not criticizing the Wildcat, but the statement looks like it may be a product of statistics rather than the Wildcat's superiority over the Hellcat and Corsair.

_________________
Remember the vets, the wonderful planes they flew and their sacrifices for a future many of them did not live to see.
Note political free signature.
I figure if you wanted my opinion on items unrelated to this forum, you'd ask for it.

This path is the road to madness!!
It's nearly impossible to compare airframes vs kill ratios vs timeframe.

Would the Hellcat or Corsair been as successfull against the pre-Midway Japanese pilots? It's hard to speculate or quantify.

_________________
Scott Rose
Editor-In-Chief/Webmaster
Warbirds Resource Group - Warbird Information Exchange - Warbird Registry

Be civil, be polite, be nice.... or be elsewhere.
-------------------------------------------------------
This site is brought to you with the support of members like you. If you find this site to be of value to you,
consider supporting this forum and the Warbirds Resource Group with a VOLUNTARY subscription
For as little as $2/month you can help ($2 x 12 = $24/year, less than most magazine subscriptions)
So If you like it here, and want to see it grow, consider helping out.



Thanks to everyone who has so generously supported the site. We really do appreciate it.

Follow us on Twitter! @WIXHQ