JohnB wrote:
The 314 would be great, but one wonders how realistic a recovery would be?
it would likely end up a 99% new build....and one has to wonder if Boeing, leery of liability*, would go along?
*Based on the reports that the P-26 replica for the NMUSAF had to use non-aircraft structure quality tubing, despite the fact the Museum doesn't fly its aircraft and the reported denial of a restorer to access factory drawings in the rebuild of a rare civil biplane.
We occasionally hear reports that someone is building a replica of the Titanic, based on that, one wonders if they'll ever build a replica Hindenburg or Graf Zepplin. Even though g it was built of modern materials, it would be great to see a large full scale rigid airship.
And almost as daunting, wasn't someone in the U.S. building a Gotha or some other WWI bomber? It would be neat to see a U.S. 1920s bomber...A Keystone or something similar. But since many/most used Curtiss engines...which are pretty much extinct in airworthy shape, that's probably not going to happen.
I've often wondered why no Keystone has been done (aside from money...obvious). They occupied a unique place in American military aviation history, but besides some tail feathers at Barksdale or at the NMUSAF, there doesn't seem to be much left.
What would it take to make one go? Seems like they were tube and fabric, so materials couldn't be too difficult to obtain. Anyhow, just musing hoping that someone who does more hand to wrench or basic bean counting on these projects might opine.