This is the place where the majority of the warbird (aircraft that have survived military service) discussions will take place. Specialized forums may be added in the new future
Post a reply

Tue May 30, 2006 12:45 pm

John,
$600,000? Sorry, can't handle that. It would only leave me $166,000 in the bank.

Mudge the strapped :D :shock:

Tue May 30, 2006 3:53 pm

Mudge wrote:John,
$600,000? Sorry, can't handle that. It would only leave me $166,000 in the bank.

Mudge the strapped :D :shock:


Tell you what Mudge, being the fair minded guy I am, I'd settle for the $166,000 and you can keep the 600,000! :wink:

John

Tue May 30, 2006 4:17 pm

The Firefly remains were scrapped after the investigation. Within the Mod the feelings about using parts from fatal crash aircraft is that they shouldn't be used. Many years ago I needed to salvage a part from a non fatal wreck for a servicable aircraft - the decision went all the way up to virtually the top at Strike Command to authorise it's use.
I don't think leaving the parts for a number of years would lessen the impact of the accident on anyone.

Wed May 31, 2006 2:51 pm

Mudge,

Come out to Olympia, Washington on 16-18 June and you can get a ride in the Skyraider, TBM, L-39, Strikemaster, Huey, Cobra or P-51 for a donation to the museum...

Wed May 31, 2006 4:50 pm

David

Thanks for the information - much appreciated.

Regards
John P

Wed May 31, 2006 5:31 pm

David J Burke wrote:The Firefly remains were scrapped after the investigation. Within the Mod the feelings about using parts from fatal crash aircraft is that they shouldn't be used. Many years ago I needed to salvage a part from a non fatal wreck for a servicable aircraft - the decision went all the way up to virtually the top at Strike Command to authorise it's use.
I don't think leaving the parts for a number of years would lessen the impact of the accident on anyone.

I've having trouble deciding how I feel about that.

On the one hand, I have to admit that projects like the rebuild of Red Tail strike me as a touch macabre, maybe even creepy.

Then again, that's probably an irrational feeling and it sure seems wasteful to do what the RN did. Maybe grown-ups should be able to get over the "aura of death" thing.

They say that when a buyer knows someone has died in a house, it drives the price down. That doesn't mean you should burn the house though.

August

Wed May 31, 2006 6:18 pm

Take a look around k5083

There are many aircraft or at least provenances of aircraft in which people died - moreover a lot more from which people were killed - for my money this is a most illogical point of view but one which rightly causes discussion because people feel differently.

I can and do say that an aircraft is an inanimate object and as such there is no reason to destroy it. Others beg to differ and I respect their feelings i just don't share them.

I think another reason why the authorities in the military have an inate fear of using components from crashes has a lot to do with their fear of retribution if by chance the part/s were faulty and caused a failure then they could / would be held accountable - it is much easier to say no?

Regards
John P

Liability Claim

Thu Jun 01, 2006 8:35 am

That makes sense John.

On the other hand 3601" ex G-TRIX flown by John Romain was displayed at Antwerpen last Sunday.

The last owner and his instructor were killed a few years ago.

Further, it is not unusual to repair valauble crashed cars even if somebody was killed before.

Regards

Willy
Post a reply