This is the place where the majority of the warbird (aircraft that have survived military service) discussions will take place. Specialized forums may be added in the new future
Tue May 30, 2006 12:45 pm
John,
$600,000? Sorry, can't handle that. It would only leave me $166,000 in the bank.
Mudge the strapped
Tue May 30, 2006 3:53 pm
Mudge wrote:John,
$600,000? Sorry, can't handle that. It would only leave me $166,000 in the bank.
Mudge the strapped

Tell you what Mudge, being the fair minded guy I am, I'd settle for the $166,000 and you can keep the 600,000!
John
Tue May 30, 2006 4:17 pm
The Firefly remains were scrapped after the investigation. Within the Mod the feelings about using parts from fatal crash aircraft is that they shouldn't be used. Many years ago I needed to salvage a part from a non fatal wreck for a servicable aircraft - the decision went all the way up to virtually the top at Strike Command to authorise it's use.
I don't think leaving the parts for a number of years would lessen the impact of the accident on anyone.
Wed May 31, 2006 2:51 pm
Mudge,
Come out to Olympia, Washington on 16-18 June and you can get a ride in the Skyraider, TBM, L-39, Strikemaster, Huey, Cobra or P-51 for a donation to the museum...
Wed May 31, 2006 4:50 pm
David
Thanks for the information - much appreciated.
Regards
John P
Wed May 31, 2006 5:31 pm
David J Burke wrote:The Firefly remains were scrapped after the investigation. Within the Mod the feelings about using parts from fatal crash aircraft is that they shouldn't be used. Many years ago I needed to salvage a part from a non fatal wreck for a servicable aircraft - the decision went all the way up to virtually the top at Strike Command to authorise it's use.
I don't think leaving the parts for a number of years would lessen the impact of the accident on anyone.
I've having trouble deciding how I feel about that.
On the one hand, I have to admit that projects like the rebuild of Red Tail strike me as a touch macabre, maybe even creepy.
Then again, that's probably an irrational feeling and it sure seems wasteful to do what the RN did. Maybe grown-ups should be able to get over the "aura of death" thing.
They say that when a buyer knows someone has died in a house, it drives the price down. That doesn't mean you should burn the house though.
August
Wed May 31, 2006 6:18 pm
Take a look around k5083
There are many aircraft or at least provenances of aircraft in which people died - moreover a lot more from which people were killed - for my money this is a most illogical point of view but one which rightly causes discussion because people feel differently.
I can and do say that an aircraft is an inanimate object and as such there is no reason to destroy it. Others beg to differ and I respect their feelings i just don't share them.
I think another reason why the authorities in the military have an inate fear of using components from crashes has a lot to do with their fear of retribution if by chance the part/s were faulty and caused a failure then they could / would be held accountable - it is much easier to say no?
Regards
John P
Thu Jun 01, 2006 8:35 am
That makes sense John.
On the other hand 3601" ex G-TRIX flown by John Romain was displayed at Antwerpen last Sunday.
The last owner and his instructor were killed a few years ago.
Further, it is not unusual to repair valauble crashed cars even if somebody was killed before.
Regards
Willy
Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group.
phpBB Mobile / SEO by Artodia.