Warbird Information Exchange

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this site are the responsibility of the poster and do not reflect the views of the management.
It is currently Sun Jun 22, 2025 11:38 am

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Classic Wings Magazine WWII Naval Aviation Research Pacific Luftwaffe Resource Center
When Hollywood Ruled The Skies - Volumes 1 through 4 by Bruce Oriss


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 18 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2
Author Message
PostPosted: Sun Apr 12, 2020 11:14 am 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Mon Nov 08, 2004 10:18 pm
Posts: 3293
Location: Phoenix, Az
Noha, think of it this way, a prop pulls a plane thru the air by rotation, the brits call it an airscrew for good reason, because that is how it works. with a single fin you have the air that the prop went thru pushing more on one side of the fin than the other, that will cause the nose to move to one side, which needs to be offset with trim, which is drag, some planes use a tab, others offset the vertical. On an Ercoupe, both rudders and fins are outside the diameter of the prop, so they are not effected by the prop wash. The reason a Coupe cannot spin is it cannot stall, nor can it be flown uncoordinated. Get too slow on a coupe and it comes down like a brick, but it is always under control as the ailerons are the entire wing trailing edge, if it can't stall, and you cannot fly uncoordinated, then it can't spin. The coupe can handle crosswinds that will ground most general aviation planes, Boeing even bought several Coupes to use to teach the crosswind landing technique of landing in the crab used on the 707 and later planes, as the Coupe had been landing that way since 1938.

_________________
Matt Gunsch, A&P, IA, Warbird maint and restorations
Jack, You have Debauched my sloth !!!!!!
We tried voting with the Ballot box, When do we start voting from the Ammo box, and am I allowed only one vote ?
Check out the Ercoupe Discussion Group on facebook


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Apr 12, 2020 3:22 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 28, 2012 4:48 pm
Posts: 1943
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio
Matt Gunsch wrote:
Noha, think of it this way, a prop pulls a plane thru the air by rotation, the brits call it an airscrew for good reason, because that is how it works. with a single fin you have the air that the prop went thru pushing more on one side of the fin than the other, that will cause the nose to move to one side, which needs to be offset with trim, which is drag, some planes use a tab, others offset the vertical. On an Ercoupe, both rudders and fins are outside the diameter of the prop, so they are not effected by the prop wash. The reason a Coupe cannot spin is it cannot stall, nor can it be flown uncoordinated. Get too slow on a coupe and it comes down like a brick, but it is always under control as the ailerons are the entire wing trailing edge, if it can't stall, and you cannot fly uncoordinated, then it can't spin. The coupe can handle crosswinds that will ground most general aviation planes, Boeing even bought several Coupes to use to teach the crosswind landing technique of landing in the crab used on the 707 and later planes, as the Coupe had been landing that way since 1938.

Thanks, I really appreciate the explanation. That makes sense. (Also, good callback to the other thread!)

I've always loved the Ercoupe, and twin tails in general. Not for any aerodynamic reason though, but just because they look cool!

_________________
Tri-State Warbird Museum Collections Manager & Museum Attendant

Warbird Philosophy Webmaster


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Apr 12, 2020 8:59 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Sep 13, 2014 9:50 am
Posts: 85
The center of gravity location for the B-24 was an issue during the stages of development and production. I'm not aware with the conceptual stage details, but the aft fuselage section made the aircraft tail heavy, and resulted in additional stability issues. Development of the first generation tail turret had difficulties from the CG issue. I came across the information noted in AAF turret development literature and other published sources. Adding the nose turret during later models improved the balance of the airframe, with along the forward fuselage addition of the PB4Y-2.

_________________
Volunteer
Yankee Air Museum


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 18 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google Adsense [Bot], Hooligan2 and 62 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group