Wed Oct 04, 2006 2:18 pm
Mon Oct 09, 2006 11:59 am
Hello Shay,
Wow, was this an unexpected email! Thank you for the link to your pictures of 510. I spoke to someone at Youngstown a long while back and they told me that she had ended up as a target at Avon Park range in Florida, but the picture on airliners.net seems to say that it is in Michigan. Hmmmm....
Anyway, on to the story:
I was assigned to 510 in 1984, as I recall. Before that I was Crew Chief of 58-0671. (See photo attached)
The pilot assigned to the aircraft was Lt. Paul Lockhart, who went on to become a Shuttle Astronaut. He flew twice before the Columbia accident, and has now apparently retired. Run a Google search and you will find info about him.
In December of 1985 a 2nd Lt. by the name of Glasgow took 510 on a cross country flight. While flying over Ohio the canopy suddenly departed the aircraft for no apparent reason. That was his story and he was sticking to it...) He IFE'd into Youngstown, a little cold but otherwise OK. We sent a team out to inspect the airplane and try to determine what happened and what was needed to repair it. Unfortunately, I was not able to go, but I was told by the team leader that there was nothing wrong with the canopy latching system in the aircraft, and the corresponding rollers on the recovered canopy showed no damage other that that received when it hit the ground. Lt Glasgow (afterward known as "Where'd the glass go?") wasn't disciplined for the incident, and went on with his career unimpeded and the cause, as far as I know, remained "unknown" As the T-33 was about to be phased out anyway, there wasn't a lot of effort expended in the investigation, and we were never allowed to repair the ship. It was just left at Youngstown, finally becoming a training bird for ABDR, apparently. I was hoping that it would have become a gate guard, at least...
The general consensus among the crew chiefs was this:
Lt. Glasgow hadn't been out of pilot training all that long, this being his first duty assignment and, as I said, his first solo cross country in the T-33. As such, we figured he was probably a little nervous. Now, in the T-38, which he had been flying in training, the canopy locking handle is in pretty much the same place as the T-33's, but it works in the opposite manner. That is, what is locked on the T-33 is unlocked in the T-38. We decided that he had what we all called a "Double "aw SH1T" experience".
While flying along in a relatively unfamiliar aircraft, he glanced at the canopy locking handle and, reverting back to his many hours in the T-38, instinctively felt that it was unlocked.
"Aw, SH1T..." he thought as he grabbed the handle and rammed it to the opposite position.
"Aw, SH1T!" he yelled as the canopy disappeared into the sky...
And with that, my beautiful airplane became a range target. Thanks a lot.
The 49th FIS was deactivated in 1987 and I went to McConnell AFB, Kansas as the first crew chief of B-1B #96, 86-0136. After two years I moved up to Flightline Expediter, and then retired in 1994 when I got orders to Barksdale. I had been there TDY, attending the NCO Academy, and knew that you were in a Gang War Zone as soon as you went out the gate, so I decided to take Bill Clinton up on his generous early retirement offer.The rest is pretty boring, so I'll spare you.
Attached are some pix that I thought you might like. One is a shot of 510 in a hangar at Youngstown with Lt Glasgow sitting in the pilots seat helping to perpetuate his new nickname. Also, a very bad B&W shot of 510 in better days, in the Hangar at Griffiss. Also a close up of my name on the nose door. You wouldn't have a corresponding shot of your own, would you? Or any others that you didn't post? I'd love to see anything else that you might have. Thanks.
Well, it was really nice to hear from you, and I hope you enjoyed my ramblings. Also, thanks for steering me to the Warbird Forum. I'll have to join and post some info there as well.
I look forward to hearing from you again.
Take care!
Russ
R.L. Sisco
MSgt, USAF, Retired
Mon Oct 09, 2006 12:17 pm
Mon Oct 09, 2006 4:46 pm
Mon Oct 09, 2006 5:54 pm
Mon Oct 09, 2006 7:01 pm
Mon Oct 09, 2006 8:47 pm
Tue Oct 10, 2006 11:05 am
Robbie Stuart wrote:Sounds like this a-hole might have been taking pictures someplace he shouldn't & he didn't wanna tell you that!
Tue Oct 10, 2006 11:12 am
DamienB wrote:Robbie Stuart wrote:Sounds like this a-hole might have been taking pictures someplace he shouldn't & he didn't wanna tell you that!
I honestly don't understand how you can insult this photographer for not wanting his picture used in some campaign to 'save' a wreck from a firing range. If you have a look at his other photos you'll see he has plenty of shots taken at the range and no doubt doesn't want to harm his chances for future access by becoming attached in any way to anything that could possibly cause hassle for the range personnel! That's entirely understandable in my opinion and certainly doesn't warrant the abuse quoted above.
Tue Oct 10, 2006 4:54 pm
Sun Oct 22, 2006 11:01 am
Sun Oct 22, 2006 2:53 pm
Sun Oct 22, 2006 5:00 pm
Fri Nov 16, 2007 1:13 pm
Fri Nov 16, 2007 3:06 pm