Thu Feb 01, 2007 7:16 am
Thu Feb 01, 2007 8:22 am
PeterA wrote:...and this is not a B-29.
PeterA
Thu Feb 01, 2007 8:53 am
Thu Feb 01, 2007 9:04 am
retroaviation wrote:Could be wrong, and probably am......but I was told that the Russians didn't have the funding to develop ceramic tiles to put on the bottom of their Shuttle, like ours has, so they used oak blocks.Other than the weight penalty, they claim that the oak just smolders in the intense heat of re-entry. If they'd have only used hickory, it would smell good too.
![]()
Gary
Thu Feb 01, 2007 9:47 am
Steve Nelson wrote:Legend has it that when the Russians built the Tu-4, they copied the B-29 so exactly that they included the flak damage patches. It may be apocryphal, but it makes a good story...![]()
SN
Thu Feb 01, 2007 10:16 am
retroaviation wrote:Could be wrong, and probably am......but I was told that the Russians didn't have the funding to develop ceramic tiles to put on the bottom of their Shuttle, like ours has, so they used oak blocks.Other than the weight penalty, they claim that the oak just smolders in the intense heat of re-entry. If they'd have only used hickory, it would smell good too.
![]()
Gary
Thu Feb 01, 2007 10:28 am
Thu Feb 01, 2007 1:09 pm