Warbird Information Exchange

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this site are the responsibility of the poster and do not reflect the views of the management.
It is currently Mon Jun 23, 2025 6:17 pm

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Classic Wings Magazine WWII Naval Aviation Research Pacific Luftwaffe Resource Center
When Hollywood Ruled The Skies - Volumes 1 through 4 by Bruce Oriss


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 26 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2
Author Message
PostPosted: Tue May 24, 2011 2:45 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 05, 2009 5:44 pm
Posts: 966
Location: Seattle, WA
Kdmoo wrote:
My avatar says it all. :)



"Now you look here, Mister Dorfmann...."

_________________
Offer me solutions, offer me alternatives, and I decline......


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 24, 2011 3:05 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 21, 2007 8:43 pm
Posts: 93
Location: N. Texas, USA
Speedy wrote:


"Now you look here, Mister Dorfmann...."



:lol:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 24, 2011 3:12 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Mar 18, 2007 3:17 pm
Posts: 343
Location: Between RAAF Uranquinty and RAAF Temora
G'day folks,

The original is one of my top five favourite movies, and I've watched it many times. Have nearly worn out the novel also. The book gives a lot of background information and more depth to the characters

I'm going to sing outside the choir, to a degree, and say that I really enjoyed the remake as well. The movie is an escapist fantasy, and it's hard to get too hung up on technical mistakes. The fact that they went to the effort of reinterpreting the story for today was laudable. I'm glad it wasn't a slavish repeat of the original, as the original stands alone and there'd be no point in doing it the same way.

I find that I usually only go to the cinema for a couple of hours of escapism. Being a firearms owner and shooter means I either ignore the painful mistakes so often repeated, otherwise I'd just get cranky and annoyed. Action movies aren't technical instruction movies or training manuals.

I'd have to agree that the opening scenes of the C-119 growling along while Johnny Cash music played was very well done. As were the comical touches. The music in the original was brilliant and most evocative.

Cheers,
Matt

_________________
Matt Austin - playing with warbirds since the early 80s.

See my Lee-Enfield videos at - http://www.youtube.com/user/Jollygreenslugg


Last edited by Jollygreenslugg on Tue May 24, 2011 3:16 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 24, 2011 3:15 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 07, 2004 2:02 am
Posts: 4701
Location: Yucca Valley, CA
Quote:
My avatar says it all.


And my signature says the rest.

The book describes the cartridge-starting sequence almost exactly like in the movie, except that Stringer (Dorfmann in the film) doesn't blow up when Towns risks the cartridge ("steady, a clearer, with black-and-blue muck curling out of the exhaust").

I still have a partly-completed Phoenix I built from parts of the old Aurora C-119 kit back home; I'll post a photo soon.

_________________
Image
All right, Mister Dorfmann, start pullin'!
Pilot: "Flap switch works hard in down position."
Mechanic: "Flap switch checked OK. Pilot needs more P.T." - Flight report, TB-17G 42-102875 (Hobbs AAF)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 25, 2011 3:14 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 02, 2004 3:57 am
Posts: 926
The film of Mr. Mantz wadding up the "Phoenix" is very disturbing to watch.Blew me away first time I saw it.hard to watch.also which Attenborough brother was in the film? Richard or David? get them wrong all the time.one more thing.what was the Monkey's name?

_________________
"WHAT ME WORRY?"


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 25, 2011 7:09 am 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club

Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2007 11:27 am
Posts: 2463
Location: Ellerslie Georgia, USA
robkamm wrote:
great movie. the remake didnt make the cut for me.


When you have a classic movie such as this, I won't watch a "remake". :drinkers:

_________________
Kind Regards,
Gary Lewis
J.A.F.O.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 25, 2011 7:39 am 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 27, 2005 10:51 pm
Posts: 4669
Location: Cheshire, CT
No takers on my Cartridge starter question? :(
I thought I get a quicker response that this from WIX'ers! :oops:
Jerry

_________________
"Always remember that, when you enter the ocean or the forest, you are no longer at the top of the food chain."


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 25, 2011 8:05 am 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 18, 2010 12:51 pm
Posts: 1185
Location: Chandler, AZ
Jerry O'Neill wrote:
Now I'm not an engine guy, so my question to those who might know is...
would firing a cartridge off like that really "clean out" the engine so it might start better?

Jerry


The same way that cranking it over with an electric starter would, by betting a better mixture more evenly distributed to the cylinders.
The gases from the cartridge inpinge on a turbine/impellerthat's geared to the engine, they don't enter the cylinders.

_________________
Lest Hero-worship raise it's head and cloud our vision, remember that World War II was fought and won by the same sort of twenty-something punks we wouldn't let our daughters date.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 25, 2011 8:48 am 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 27, 2007 10:23 pm
Posts: 2347
Location: Atlanta, GA
Wasn't the original a C-82 Packet? Been a while, might be wrong.

_________________
"Take care of the little things and the big things will take care of themselves."


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 25, 2011 11:48 am 
Online
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2011 12:27 am
Posts: 5614
Location: Eastern Washington
Ken wrote:
Wasn't the original a C-82 Packet? Been a while, might be wrong.



Yes.
44-23015 N6887C was used for flying shots
44-23031 and 23036 were used for the desert ground shots and the wings and tailboom for a R4Q-1 (USMC C-119) were used as well.

_________________
Remember the vets, the wonderful planes they flew and their sacrifices for a future many of them did not live to see.
Note political free signature.
I figure if you wanted my opinion on items unrelated to this forum, you'd ask for it.


Last edited by JohnB on Wed May 25, 2011 1:28 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 25, 2011 12:42 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 02, 2004 3:57 am
Posts: 926
the premise of the movie is rather absurde.but can anyone come up with another film that is as much fantasy for any airplane buff(big round engines) as this movie.it blew me away as a kid,and I still love it.

_________________
"WHAT ME WORRY?"


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 26 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 43 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group