tom d. friedman wrote:
I think somebody threw the beatles white album at the same time as the warbirds past by

honestly.... i'm fascinated with ufo's & black projects etc, i certainly believe we are not alone in the universe, but why oh why oh why???? must these sightings always be so damned blurry

it's been like this since roswell

but you'd think it would be different today, that just 1 clear pic could be obtained with all the computer photo technology & picture enhancement. it's aggravating & dissapointing to always hear of an incident & then lo & behold.... a blobby, blurry worthless picture backs up the sighting. hey maybe it was a wix emoticon doing aerial recon??? regards, tom
Quite a few of these sightings appear in the media via a cam corder route. Video is more exciting for ratings than a still picture. Cam corders pixel resolution is quite poor when a distant object is zoomed in though the pixel ratings of camcorders is improving all the time.
Another thought to consider is this: If a small fraction of these sightings caught on cam are very real and of 'not of this world origin' and if these vehicles are transitting vast unimaginable vector distances in timescales which are well within an occupents lifespan, then I suggest that the power source utilised would have to utilise and modify the force we call gravity with some considerable skill. Perhaps the reason we see such morphing shapes reported and blurred images is that the 'gravity' power source of the vehicle is so strong locally that it causes light energy to be absorbed or deformed (in our eyes).
Everyones got their own opinions of course, but I get tired of the constant Govt sponsored denials and ridicule of anyone and everything concerning a subject which would be to our mutual benifit to understand and study very publically and out in the wider world too. For the very same blinkered reasons we are still in 2005 relying en mass upon internal combustion engines.