StangStung wrote:
Quote:
Not really a true "Grasshopper", but how about some Sentinel...
Expound please...what is the definition of "true grasshopper"?
And thanks for the great L-bird pics!
Though no technical definition truly exists, "Grasshopper" generally refers to L-2's, L-3's, and L-4's... the light stuff (though they had various other names "Defender", "Cub", etc.)... They were all light adaptations of currently existing civilian aircraft. The L-5 was designed as a military aircraft from the start and is generally not included in the "Grasshopper" lineage. With 185-198 HP (depending who you talk to), increased useful load, flaps, etc. the L-5 set itself apart from the rest of the 65 HP clan. Though this may a bit of a biased analysis, I feel most would agree with the usage of the term "grasshopper".
Now if we want to debate "Warbug"...
mustangdriver wrote:
Taylor, thanks! And great shot of your L-5 in those pics. I was a member of the restoration team on the L-21 along with the crew chief Rob who posts here as warbirdaid. I then got to become a flightcrew meember on it. It was one of the original ones that went to Italy to serve in the Army. It is restored in it's Army markings. It also has flaps! Here is a link with a pic, scroll about half way down
http://www.fortsmithflightmasters.com/fp/fp011101.html IIRC most of the L-21s around today came back from Italy. They really are a cool option for anyone who wants a Super Cub... why not restore an L-21 as opposed to getting the boring civvy version

There are usually a few projects floating around. For everyone here, this is the one Chris was involved with. Looks great!

-T