Warbird Information Exchange

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this site are the responsibility of the poster and do not reflect the views of the management.
It is currently Fri Jun 20, 2025 5:47 pm

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Classic Wings Magazine WWII Naval Aviation Research Pacific Luftwaffe Resource Center
When Hollywood Ruled The Skies - Volumes 1 through 4 by Bruce Oriss


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 18 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Who owns the Shturmovik?
PostPosted: Wed Oct 26, 2011 1:02 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jun 01, 2011 11:23 am
Posts: 699
Any more news on who in the U. S. owns the Shturmovik that recently flew in Russia? I'm told by a very reliable source that it's definitely not Jerry Yagen, so I'm assuming Paul Allen?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Oct 26, 2011 1:10 pm 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2006 9:42 pm
Posts: 2707
Location: NP, NJ, USA
Stephan Wilkinson wrote:
so I'm assuming Paul Allen?



That's my guess.

_________________
Share your story: Rutgers Oral History Archive http://oralhistory.rutgers.edu/


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Oct 26, 2011 2:38 pm 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member

Joined: Sat Dec 22, 2007 12:36 am
Posts: 7961
Location: Mt. Vernon, WA.
Now that would be a 'FLY DAY' !!!!!! :supz: :supz: the PO-2, the I-16, the il-2, and Allens Mig-29 UTI, would pretty much cover Russian aviation wouldn't it?

_________________
Don't make me go get my flying monkeys-


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Oct 26, 2011 3:41 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jun 01, 2011 11:23 am
Posts: 699
Quote:
would pretty much cover Russian aviation wouldn't it?


Hardly.

You'd also need a Yak 9, maybe a Yak-3, a MiG-15 and a MiG-21 to do that, at a minimum...


Last edited by Stephan Wilkinson on Wed Oct 26, 2011 4:18 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Oct 26, 2011 3:42 pm 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 10, 2004 4:43 pm
Posts: 7501
Location: northern ohio
wow!! i didn't know there was 1 flyable let alone in private ownership!! that's excellent news!! hope it hits the air show circuit in 2012!!

_________________
tom d. friedman - hey!!! those fokkers were messerschmitts!! * without ammunition, the usaf would be just another flying club!!! * better to have piece of mind than piece of tail!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Oct 26, 2011 4:20 pm 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member

Joined: Sat Dec 22, 2007 12:36 am
Posts: 7961
Location: Mt. Vernon, WA.
Tom,
I was speaking more along the lines of eras, from 80 mph sticks and rags to a transitional airframe (I-16) which was sort of in both worlds, the maturation of serious dedicated ground attack on a large scale, up to double sonic, pretty much cutting edge. Granted YAKs, Lagg's, Mig 15, and a Mig 21 would round out the package but it would be like saying you can't adequately represent the history of the Indy 500 without having 85 cars in your collection instead of fewer, but more pivotal cars

_________________
Don't make me go get my flying monkeys-


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Oct 26, 2011 4:38 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jun 01, 2011 11:23 am
Posts: 699
(It was actually me, Stephan, taking issue with your Soviet-aviation selections, not Tom.)

What I meant was that you're leaving a big gap between a couple of old-timers and plus a crude ground-attack airplane, and then a fourth-generation jet. Just as you wouln't be able to fairly represent Indy cars with a Marmon, Mauri Rose's Maserati, a '50s roadster and Dan Wheldon's Dallaraa.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Oct 26, 2011 4:45 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2007 6:52 pm
Posts: 3413
Location: Wichita Falls, Texas, USA
The Inspector wrote:
...the PO-2, the I-16, the il-2, and Allens Mig-29 UTI...


Have to agree with Stephan.

PO-2 - WWI
I-16 - Interwar
Il-2 - WWII
MiG-29UTI - Late Cold War

You missed -

Korea
Vietnam (era)/Early Cold War
Afghanistan/Late Cold War

3 major parts of the history of the USSR.

I would suggest a representation would be PO-2, I-16, Il-2, MiG-15/17, MiG-21, Su-25/MiG-23/27, MiG-29. That would cover all the major eras and leaps in Soviet aviation technology from Biplanes, to Monoplanes, to Modern Monoplanes, to Jets, to Supersonic Jets, to 2nd/3rd Generation Jets/Attack, to 4th Generation "Superfighters".


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Oct 26, 2011 5:15 pm 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Wed May 30, 2007 3:57 pm
Posts: 2339
Location: Minnesota
http://www.heraldnet.com/article/200806 ... te=SCBJart

"Other Flying Heritage Collection aircraft in various stages of restoration include a Goodyear FG-1D Corsair; North America B-25J Mitchell; Boeing B-17E Flying Fortress; a jet-propelled Messerschmitt Me 262A-1a Schwalbe; Ilyushin IL-2M-3 Shturmovik; Lockheed P-38J Lightning; Casa 2.111D (Heinkel He 111H); North American F-86A Sabre; Yakovlev Yak-3U; Republic F105G Thunderchief; Vought F-8 Crusader; Mikoyan and Gurevich MiG-21 Mongol; BAE/Hawker GR-3 Harrier and a DeHavilland DH98 Mosquito."

If this still remains true (originally written in 2008), that should take care of things quite well, covering Russian military aviation (on top of what FHC already has on display).


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Oct 26, 2011 5:25 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 04, 2004 8:54 am
Posts: 3331
tom d. friedman wrote:
hope it hits the air show circuit in 2012!!

Unlikely.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Oct 26, 2011 5:34 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!

Joined: Thu Jan 25, 2007 7:31 pm
Posts: 1123
Location: Caribou, Maine
It would be interesting to see an Illushin Il-28 Beagle in the West. That would round out the collection nicely.

Po-2 is interwar, not WWI. Basically a Stearman-equivalent in age and mission, though Po-2 was built both before and after the Stearman (production continued into the 1950s!)

_________________
Kevin McCartney


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Oct 26, 2011 5:59 pm 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member

Joined: Sat Dec 22, 2007 12:36 am
Posts: 7961
Location: Mt. Vernon, WA.
As long as it's Allens money, why not? For those additions he will need a much bigger hanger facility @ KPAE as Bldg. 207 is getting kinda cramped with what's in there now.
And tell me where else you can go and see the aforementioned aircraft types flying and never leave your folding chair?

_________________
Don't make me go get my flying monkeys-


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Oct 26, 2011 6:22 pm 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Wed May 30, 2007 3:57 pm
Posts: 2339
Location: Minnesota
I seem to recall FHC describing that their Mig-29 will be displayed on a 'rotational' basis (rotated into museum display on occasion, and kept at off-site facilities in between (as it is right now)), and this may be applied to more of their aircraft as further restorations are completed (various aircraft kept on a rotional display cycle), that is if FHC doesn't have any plans for a larger museum facility, or an expansion upon what they already have (if that is even possible?).


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Oct 27, 2011 7:09 pm 
Offline
KiwiZac
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 13, 2008 12:33 am
Posts: 1466
Location: Blenheim, NZ
It is officially, definitively the Flying Heritage Collection: http://flyingheritage.com/TemplateMain. ... ntentId=93

Great photo, I can't wait for the next Classic Wings mag.

_________________
Zac in NZ
#avgeek, modelbuilder, photographer, writer. Callsign: "HANDBAG".
https://linktr.ee/zacyates

"It's his plane, he spent the money to restore it, he can do with it what he wants. I will never understand what's hard to comprehend about this." - kalamazookid, 20/08/2013
"The more time you spend around warbirds the sooner you learn nothing, is simple." - JohnB, 24/02/22


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Oct 27, 2011 8:08 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 29, 2011 6:43 pm
Posts: 148
Location: Everett, WA
Yay!!! I was just at FHC today for my weekly visit. I had a suspicion that it was coming here, but man it's great to hear it officially!! I look forward to taking hundreds of pics of the new member of the FHC family as soon as she arrives!


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 18 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google Adsense [Bot] and 50 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group