Can we just try 'British' not 'English', please? It's as crashing as assuming all Americans are Texans. Thanks.
Mr Tillman is very much an American, and with an American perspective - and a very good writer, too. IMHO.
SaxMan wrote:
In the Atlantic, the Avenger's range, ability to carry large quantities and a large variety of ordinance combined with airborne radar sets did make it a uniquely capable aircraft. The Swordfish was likely the only plane that could be competitive with the Avenger in those categories, and the Avenger was by far a much more modern aircraft.
The Swordfish was a ridiculously outdated aircraft, but it was, late in the war, the only anti-submarine aircraft capable of operating from Merchant Aircraft Carriers, and was equipped with ASV radar and anti submarine rockets as well as being depth charge capable.
Quote:
A Fairey Swordfish Mk.III with ASV Mk.XI radar between its wheel legs, dipole arrays on its wings struts, and rocket launching rails under the wings.With the development of new torpedo attack aircraft, the Swordfish was soon redeployed successfully in an anti-submarine role, armed with depth-charges or eight "60 lb" (27 kg) RP-3 rockets and flying from the smaller escort carriers or even Merchant Aircraft Carriers (MAC) when equipped for rocket-assisted takeoff (RATO). Its low stall speed and inherently tough design made it ideal for operation from the MAC carriers in the often severe mid Atlantic weather. Indeed, its takeoff and landing speeds were so low that it did not require the carrier to be steaming into the wind, unlike most carrier-based aircraft. On occasion, when the wind was right, Swordfish were flown from a carrier at anchor.[8]
Swordfish-equipped units accounted for 14 U-boats destroyed. The Swordfish was meant to be replaced by the Albacore, also a biplane, but actually outlived its intended successor. It was, finally, however, succeeded by the Fairey Barracuda monoplane torpedo bomber.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fairey_Swo ... al_historyQuote:
The Swordfish was now equipped with ASV radar and rocket projectiles for anti-submarine operations. The Swordfish Mk.II had wings with metal-skinned undersides and launching rails for eight 60lb rockets. The provision for a float undercarriage was deleted, and the more powerful Pegasus 30 engine installed. The Mk.III had ASV Mk.XI radar in a big radome between the landing gear legs. This radar had a range of about 40km against ships, and in good conditions also against U-boats; but it would detect a Schnorkel only in very calm seas and at distances below 8km. Some Mk.IIs and many Mk.IIIs became Mk.IVs when a cockpit canopy was installed.
Swordfishes operated from 14 escort carriers and 18 MAC (Merchant Aircraft Carrier) ships. MAC ships were converted oil tankers or grain ships, with a flight deck but minimal maintenance facilities, and the aircraft were continuously exposed to the often appalling weather. For operations from small flight decks with heavy loads, rocket-assisted take-offs were necessary.
In their anti-submarine role, the Swordfishes were very successful. They usually flew patrols at night, patrolling between 145km and 40km ahead of the convoy. Targets were located with radar, and investigated by dropping flares. In September 1944, Swordfishes from HMS Vindex sank four U-boats in one voyage. In total, Swordfishes claimed 22.5 U-boats.
http://uboat.net/allies/aircraft/swordfish.htm(The discrepancy in U Boats sunk is probably mixing U Boats sunk by MAC /Escort carrier Swordfish, as against
all Swordfish units.)
In other words, while the Avenger was, indeed, a more advanced aircraft; but in the Atlantic, Swordfish were there, doing the job when the Avenger wasn't able to be because it was too big and landed too fast.
Again, there's a trap here - 'better', i.e. of superior capability of performance may (rarely, but in this case) mean something is less
fit for the purpose.
In answer to the original question, I think Mr Tillman's simply incorrect in ascribing a leading role to the Avenger in the keeping open the Atlantic supply lines. It played a greater role in the Battle of the Atlantic overall, but again, other types have greater claims to every type of action Avengers were involved in.
Also, IMHO (and I don't claim to be familiar with the Avenger's CV in detail) like most types, there are very few places you can say the
type (as opposed to 'one of that nation's alternate aircraft') played a decisive role in battle - not that any of those points detract from the achievements and sacrifices of the Avenger crews, or of the capability of one of Grumman's finest.
Regards,