Warbird Information Exchange

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this site are the responsibility of the poster and do not reflect the views of the management.
It is currently Fri Jul 04, 2025 5:19 pm

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Classic Wings Magazine WWII Naval Aviation Research Pacific Luftwaffe Resource Center
When Hollywood Ruled The Skies - Volumes 1 through 4 by Bruce Oriss


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 9 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Wed Nov 07, 2012 11:59 am 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member

Joined: Sat Dec 22, 2007 12:36 am
Posts: 7961
Location: Mt. Vernon, WA.
Nov. 7 thru 10 th, Historic Flight is celebrating the arrival on their DC-3 after a long restoration from excecutive configuration to pre war Pan American Airlines markings.

_________________
Don't make me go get my flying monkeys-


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Nov 08, 2012 2:31 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 29, 2011 6:43 pm
Posts: 148
Location: Everett, WA
I was out there to get video of its arrival... Until my darn camera went Tango Uniform. :evil: sure looked good, though! Sat out in the cold for two hours! Could see the runway and taxiway lights reflecting off of it and a beautiful blue flame flickering out the exhaust. I'll head over tomorrow, hopefully with better luck.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Nov 08, 2012 10:10 am 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member

Joined: Sat Dec 22, 2007 12:36 am
Posts: 7961
Location: Mt. Vernon, WA.
Fight2FlyPhoto wrote:
I was out there to get video of its arrival... Until my darn camera went Tango Uniform. :evil: sure looked good, though! Sat out in the cold for two hours! Could see the runway and taxiway lights reflecting off of it and a beautiful blue flame flickering out the exhaust. I'll head over tomorrow, hopefully with better luck.

Cool! It's another quandry airframe. It's l/n (4193) turns up in a mixed bag of C-47/C-48's in ABCDLIST but with a 4 digit s/n even tho the FAA site lists 1949 as it's D.O.M. So I'm guessing it was a C-47 that obviously went thru a conversion to DC-3C status but with no other info like military s/n to use as a starting point nor who might have done the conversion and there were a bunch of folks doing box hauler to pax work in the post war time period.
It had a longer radar nose when it went through here heading for mod in Canada so I suspect it was someones corporate baby.

_________________
Don't make me go get my flying monkeys-


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Nov 08, 2012 4:23 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 20, 2010 3:46 pm
Posts: 515
Location: CYYJ
The Inspector wrote:
Cool! It's another quandry airframe. It's l/n (4193) turns up in a mixed bag of C-47/C-48's in ABCDLIST but with a 4 digit s/n even tho the FAA site lists 1949 as it's D.O.M. So I'm guessing it was a C-47 that obviously went thru a conversion to DC-3C status but with no other info like military s/n to use as a starting point nor who might have done the conversion and there were a bunch of folks doing box hauler to pax work in the post war time period.
It had a longer radar nose when it went through here heading for mod in Canada so I suspect it was someones corporate baby.
Multiple sources agree that there never was a msn 4193 and that this airframe is in fact msn 14193.

Not everyone agrees pop1 see: http://www.ruudleeuw.com/dc-3_page_2.htm


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Nov 08, 2012 5:52 pm 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member

Joined: Sat Dec 22, 2007 12:36 am
Posts: 7961
Location: Mt. Vernon, WA.
WallyB wrote:
The Inspector wrote:
Cool! It's another quandry airframe. It's l/n (4193) turns up in a mixed bag of C-47/C-48's in ABCDLIST but with a 4 digit s/n even tho the FAA site lists 1949 as it's D.O.M. So I'm guessing it was a C-47 that obviously went thru a conversion to DC-3C status but with no other info like military s/n to use as a starting point nor who might have done the conversion and there were a bunch of folks doing box hauler to pax work in the post war time period.
It had a longer radar nose when it went through here heading for mod in Canada so I suspect it was someones corporate baby.
Multiple sources agree that there never was a msn 4193 and that this airframe is in fact msn 14193.

Not everyone agrees pop1 see: http://www.ruudleeuw.com/dc-3_page_2.htm


Now it gets interesting, thanks so much for the additional info. it's a C-47B-1-DK 4348377, l/n 25638 then to the Navy as 17263 as an R4D-6. Post war it became N 8350C, N 37800, N 800J, N 89009.

Here's a spanner bunged into the machinery, according to Baughers Navy/Marines lists (crossing from his USAAF lists) 17263 crashed in bad weather near Toledo, OH. on 1/23/49 HMMMMMMMM!

Oh, and l/n 14193 also turns up as an A-20G-20-DO 4286792

_________________
Don't make me go get my flying monkeys-


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Nov 08, 2012 7:39 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 20, 2010 3:46 pm
Posts: 515
Location: CYYJ
The civilian history of the airframe is pretty much well established and I don't think there's much doubt
Image
N8009
Image
and N877MG are the same airplane.

Which airplane is an entirely different matter. If msn 14193 (aka 25638) was "destroyed" in a 1949 crash then it can't be that. Line number 4193 corresponds to msn 20806 which is a C-47B-1-DL (DL=Long Beach) and msn 14193 is/was a C-47B-1-DK (DK=Oklahoma) so whichever it is the data plate is clearly bogus - neither were built at Santa Monica!

One of life's mysteries.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Nov 08, 2012 9:00 pm 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member

Joined: Sat Dec 22, 2007 12:36 am
Posts: 7961
Location: Mt. Vernon, WA.
WallyB wrote:
The civilian history of the airframe is pretty much well established and I don't think there's much doubt
Image
N8009
Image
and N877MG are the same airplane.

Which airplane is an entirely different matter. If msn 14193 (aka 25638) was "destroyed" in a 1949 crash then it can't be that. Line number 4193 corresponds to msn 20806 which is a C-47B-1-DL (DL=Long Beach) and msn 14193 is/was a C-47B-1-DK (DK=Oklahoma) so whichever it is the data plate is clearly bogus - neither were built at Santa Monica!

One of life's mysteries.

Then everyone is hosed up, Baugher, ABCDLIST, the FAA, :angry: :ouch: and I used 14193 from your previous post of info. HMMMM-

_________________
Don't make me go get my flying monkeys-


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Nov 09, 2012 10:24 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 20, 2010 3:46 pm
Posts: 515
Location: CYYJ
The Inspector wrote:
Then everyone is hosed up, Baugher, ABCDLIST, the FAA, :angry: :ouch: and I used 14193 from your previous post of info. HMMMM-
The 14193 theory doesn't seem to hold up unless that airplane somehow recovered from it's Toledo "crash". I'm inclined to be in the 20806 camp since there is some evidence that "N8350C" was one of a number of CNAC aircraft repatriated after the revolution by the escort carrier USS Windham Bay CVE-92.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Nov 09, 2012 10:30 am 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member

Joined: Sat Dec 22, 2007 12:36 am
Posts: 7961
Location: Mt. Vernon, WA.
WallyB wrote:
The Inspector wrote:
Then everyone is hosed up, Baugher, ABCDLIST, the FAA, :angry: :ouch: and I used 14193 from your previous post of info. HMMMM-
The 14193 theory doesn't seem to hold up unless that airplane somehow recovered from it's Toledo "crash". I'm inclined to be in the 20806 camp since there is some evidence that "N8350C" was one of a number of CNAC aircraft repatriated after the revolution by the escort carrier USS Windham Bay CVE-92.



No idea, but I know it doesn't take very long to drill out and reshoot 4 #40 rivets somewhere else 'if you need to', a possible early case of 'data plate' overhaul? :rolleyes: :rofl:

_________________
Don't make me go get my flying monkeys-


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 9 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google Adsense [Bot] and 42 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group