Sun Mar 18, 2007 3:53 am
Sun Mar 18, 2007 4:10 am
Sun Mar 18, 2007 9:15 am
Sun Mar 18, 2007 10:42 am
Sun Mar 18, 2007 10:44 am
Sun Mar 18, 2007 11:11 am
tom d. friedman wrote:other than the few that can land on water, namely the mars, what's the stipulation / reasoning for not allowing the majority ww 2 flying boats to park in the drink in the u.s.?? & by who's authority?? faa? i saw in the current issue of warbirds a pby that landed on lake geneva switzerand. great pics!! why do other countries allow water landings??
Sun Mar 18, 2007 9:11 pm
tom d. friedman wrote:What's the stipulation / reasoning for not allowing the majority ww 2 flying boats to park in the drink in the U.S.?? & by who's authority? FAA?
Sun Mar 18, 2007 9:50 pm
Mon Mar 19, 2007 8:45 pm
Mon Mar 19, 2007 8:50 pm
Mon Mar 19, 2007 9:14 pm
Mon Mar 19, 2007 9:17 pm
AIRIC wrote:It's great to see the old girl back in the air again. It was the first Catalina I had ever seen fly and I hope to shoot it in the future, hopefully at Geneseo.
Some Geneseo memories.
Cheers,
Eric
Tue Mar 20, 2007 8:39 pm
Tue Mar 20, 2007 9:22 pm
Because the nosegear doors were not recovered, it is not possible to exclude the possibility that the aircraft encountered a significant piece of flotsam which caused the doors to collapse inwards.
Regardless of this, the presence of the severe corrosion in the nosegear operating mechanism torque tube can only have served to compromise the ability of the left door to resist the range of loads which might have been imposed during a water landing. The corrosion found in the torque tube had clearly developed over a long time but it went undetected because it was inside a closed area and no specific inspection of the inside of the tubes was called for.
...
The Maintenance Manual and Schedule for the Catalina were developed and written in a different age when these aircraft were very differently utilised. Although both the Manual and Schedule have been developed as a result of the Catalina's continued amphibious operation, for probably much longer than originally envisaged, there are now likely to be some time related maintenance considerations which did not previously exist.
It is, therefore, recommended to the Federal Aviation Administration that:-
98-66 The nosegear bay door torque tubes of amphibious models of Catalina aircraft are examined and the bungs, if fitted, are permanently removed to facilitate inspection of the inside of the tube and to allow it to "breathe".
98-67 An inspection technique for the inside of the torque tube assemblies is developed and included into the Maintenance Manual and Schedule for amphibious models of Catalina aircraft.
98-68 Specific dimensional requirements are developed for the rigging of the nosegear bay doors and their latching system.
Thu Mar 22, 2007 9:10 pm