Tue May 08, 2007 3:38 pm
Tue May 08, 2007 3:53 pm
Tue May 08, 2007 6:12 pm
Tue May 08, 2007 8:01 pm
retroaviation wrote:I recently had one of our volunteers (who's become a friend of mine) tell me that he initially had some reservations about coming down to help me work because he'd heard that I can be a reeeeal *sshole to be around sometimes. Well, I reckon it's situations like I found this morning that make me that way.
I'll holler at y'all later.
Gary
Tue May 08, 2007 11:30 pm
Wed May 09, 2007 1:15 am
Wed May 09, 2007 8:02 am
Wed May 09, 2007 11:04 am
Wed May 09, 2007 11:42 am
Shay wrote:927 definately has a whole new attitude.
Very sharp and refreshing. Perhaps CAF will see the benefit of scheme changes every now and again and apply it to "other" aircraft in the CAF's stables.![]()
Gary
Was there ever any thought given as to maybe restoring the main portion of the 927 in "A" model configuration while restoring the cockpit forward in "D"model configuration? With the Dual Wing Pitot tube, astro dome and 3 .50 cal greenhouse gun configuration? Since that is essentially what you have.
Just wondering. Just something about those "Prickley" front ends on the "D" models.
Shay
____________
Semper Fortis
Wed May 09, 2007 1:56 pm
Wed May 09, 2007 2:37 pm
Wed May 09, 2007 4:58 pm
Wed May 09, 2007 5:31 pm
Jack Frost wrote:Correct me if I'm wrong, but didn't the later nose turret equipped B-24 need the long pitot tube masts to get the tubes out in non-turbulent airflow?
Jack
Thu May 10, 2007 12:42 am
Thu May 10, 2007 8:26 am
Sasnak wrote:Gary,
How are the rudders and elevators coming?