Warbird Information Exchange

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this site are the responsibility of the poster and do not reflect the views of the management.
It is currently Sun Jul 20, 2025 11:28 pm

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Classic Wings Magazine WWII Naval Aviation Research Pacific Luftwaffe Resource Center
When Hollywood Ruled The Skies - Volumes 1 through 4 by Bruce Oriss


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 11 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: PIMA Catalinas [pics]
PostPosted: Wed May 16, 2007 12:50 am 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 30, 2004 7:34 pm
Posts: 2927
Anyone know the ID of these Catalina Parts out on the "Back 40" at the Pima Air and Space Museum?
Image

I’m assuming they will be utilized with this airframe to complete a Catalina display
Image

Anyone know how what they are missing to put together a PBY for display?
TIA


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed May 16, 2007 3:01 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2006 1:07 pm
Posts: 338
The red rear hull is N322FA as marked. The forward hull in the first picture is N10609. The tail unit next to it is not from the same airframe, at least I think not from a study of other photos I have seen.

_________________
David Legg
Editor, The Catalina News
The Catalina Society
Author: Consolidated PBY Catalina - The Peacetime Record


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 16, 2007 5:09 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 29, 2004 7:45 pm
Posts: 872
Location: Wyoming, MN
Warbirdnerd wrote:
Image


Its so sad to see the PBY in this kind of shape. Somewhere I have photos of it when it stopped by the Planes Of Fame East on its way out to California.

_________________
Dan Johnson


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed May 16, 2007 9:01 pm 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 30, 2004 7:34 pm
Posts: 2927
David Legg wrote:
The red rear hull is N322FA as marked. The forward hull in the first picture is N10609. The tail unit next to it is not from the same airframe, at least I think not from a study of other photos I have seen.


Thanks David, Do you know if they have a set of wings?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu May 17, 2007 12:12 am 
Offline
Been here a long time
Been here a long time

Joined: Sun May 02, 2004 1:16 am
Posts: 11324
David Legg wrote:
The red rear hull is N322FA as marked.


http://www.ntsb.gov/ntsb/brief2.asp?ev_ ... 270&akey=1


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu May 17, 2007 12:26 am 
Offline

Joined: Sun May 02, 2004 9:54 pm
Posts: 722
Location: Tucson, AZ
Canadian Vickers PBV-1A (OA-10A) “Canso A/Catalina” (California Water Bomber”) (CV-560)(USN 68013)(USAAF 44-34049)(CF-GLX, C-FGLX, N322FA)(California Fire Attack) The first photo of the engines was taken on 03/10/04. The Next 5 were taken 04/06/04. Showing some of the parts in addition to the fuselage.
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image


The next two photos are of the two hulls shown in the first photo of this topic. They were taken 10/07/04
Image
Image


The last photo was taken 03/03/06 of another fuselage section at Pima.
Image

bill word


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat May 19, 2007 1:29 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2006 1:07 pm
Posts: 338
Further to my earlier posting about the pale grey hull of N10609 on what appear to be tractor tyres, I now retract my comment that the detached rear hull section is probably not from the same airframe. A closer study of other photos I have in my collection show that there are some faint markings still just visible on the Pima tail relic that correspond to markings on N10609 when it was more complete. So the bit of rear hull IS from N10609. The dark grey hull section shown in the latest set of photos is not Sad Sack but is one of the four ex-RCAF Canso A amphibians that were stored for years on a farm in Ontario by George Ventress and of which Sad Sack was one. The hull now at Pima is the one that was stored for some years in a barn at Geneseo, NY before going to Pima much more recently. Its RCAF i/d is not known but is possibly either 9829 or 9839. (Sad Sack was 11029 and the 4th Ventress Canso was 9825, now with Harold Carlaw at Campbellford, Ont.). The photo at Pima shows where the main u/c has been removed and plated over.

_________________
David Legg
Editor, The Catalina News
The Catalina Society
Author: Consolidated PBY Catalina - The Peacetime Record


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat May 19, 2007 10:34 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 28, 2007 4:46 pm
Posts: 1523
Location: Brenham, Texas
322 Fire Attack got itself looking like that after a bad water pickup about ten years ago. Seems like I heard from one of the PBY@yahoo bunch that all this wreckage and partial airframes were being gathered to build a static display. Comments? David or Matt?
David, isn't Sad Sack the houseboat conversion that was used for the new forward section of Ben Kalka's N84857?
If you'd like to see N322FA in happier times, check it out on a.net.

Doug Ratchford, 'Canso42'


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat May 19, 2007 10:41 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 28, 2007 4:46 pm
Posts: 1523
Location: Brenham, Texas
David,
Was N10609 the hull that was first spotted travelling down the Interstate by truck that had us all in a dither at PBY@yahoo over its identity? If so what is it's background?

Doug.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 19, 2007 11:19 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Feb 11, 2007 2:08 am
Posts: 164
Warbirdnerd wrote:
Image


I remember seeing this bird on the ramp in a couple of So.Cal. airports and then a couple months later reading of it's demise. Shame. :cry:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun May 20, 2007 2:38 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2006 1:07 pm
Posts: 338
To answer the questions posted a couple of items back, the nose of Sad Sack was indeed used on N84857 at Skagit County. The centre section, or what's left of it, is with Catalina Aero at Nanaimo on Vancouver Island (along with the complete C-FNJB). And, based on what is now known, N10609 was the hull that was seen road-running.

_________________
David Legg
Editor, The Catalina News
The Catalina Society
Author: Consolidated PBY Catalina - The Peacetime Record


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 11 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 38 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group