Warbird Information Exchange

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this site are the responsibility of the poster and do not reflect the views of the management.
It is currently Fri Jun 20, 2025 4:41 am

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Classic Wings Magazine WWII Naval Aviation Research Pacific Luftwaffe Resource Center
When Hollywood Ruled The Skies - Volumes 1 through 4 by Bruce Oriss


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 43 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Tue Sep 04, 2007 6:52 am 
Offline
Pvt. Joker
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 11, 2005 12:22 pm
Posts: 1012
Location: Location: Location!
From yesterday’s AvWeb email:

Quote:
Museum Plaque Altered To Appease Vet Pilots

Former Second World War bomber crew members are applauding the Canadian War Museum’s promise to revise the wording on a plaque that introduces the museum’s exhibit on the Allied bombing campaign. But historians are decrying the politically- charged decision, saying that not only is the current wording appropriate, the decision to amend it was the result of political pressure and not for academic or historical integrity. Canadian veterans’ organizations lobbied extensively and threatened a boycott of the museum over the plaque, which they claim inaccurately portrayed bomber crews as war criminals.


Link to rest of article.

_________________
Image
Commemorative Air Force
Experimental Aircraft Association
Warbirds of America

What are you waiting for? Join us!

Best way to contact me- email my last name @gmail.com


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Sep 04, 2007 7:15 am 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 10, 2004 4:43 pm
Posts: 7501
Location: northern ohio
you can't sugar coat history. surely not every vet squawked, probably some one high in the canadian govt, broke a few balls to get the change. this sanitizing history thing is a huge mistake, those guys were no more war criminals than bambi. war is not pretty. the geneva convention set the rules, the allies for the most part respected them. mistakes were made yes, but they were not blatant, not the case for the ww 2 axis!!

_________________
tom d. friedman - hey!!! those fokkers were messerschmitts!! * without ammunition, the usaf would be just another flying club!!! * better to have piece of mind than piece of tail!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: vets
PostPosted: Tue Sep 04, 2007 8:09 am 
Offline
Probationary Member

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 7:53 pm
Posts: 3803
Location: Aspen, CO
If the Allied bombing of civilian targets was a war crime, primary blame should be directed at the leaders who assigned these targets rather than the crews who flew the missions. Were civilians targeted primarily as part of a terror or psychological campaign, or were their deaths part of the results of bombing large cities? Think of attacking the US in 1945: Targets would have to be port areas like New York, L A, New Orleans, Galveston, as well as auto producing areas like Detroit, steel in Cleveland, Pittsburg, govt in Washington. Not much benefit in bombing Alpine, Texas. Each of these industrial targets would have resulted in civilan deaths also, but probably would not be condidered war crimes. However, any historically accurate display of a bombing campaign should be factual, as to civilian deaths and production destroyed, with no sugar coating, War, even for the right reasons can be awful, and it is good that the Allies as civilized people live with their conscience, rather than pretending something did not happen.


l

_________________
Bill Greenwood
Spitfire N308WK


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Sep 04, 2007 8:34 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 16, 2005 10:22 am
Posts: 640
Location: VA, USA
I followed the link and read the rest of the article. Here's the portion that describes the plaque:

Quote:
The plaque is entitled An Enduring Controversy and reads: "The value and morality of the strategic bomber offensive against Germany remains bitterly contested," the panel reads. "Bomber Command's aim was to crush civilian morale and force Germany to surrender by destroying its cities and industrial installations. Although Bomber Command and American attacks left 600,000 Germans dead and more than five million homeless, the raids resulted in only small reductions of German war production until late in the war."


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Sep 04, 2007 12:52 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jul 11, 2007 1:15 pm
Posts: 24
Location: Gainesville, Florida
As a veteran of 35 bombing missions with the 8th Air Force, 91st Bomb Group, I can testify that all missions, bar none, were briefed for a military or industrial target. It is true that many of these targets were erected in areas adjacent to civlian housing, schools, hospitals, etc., and were thus subject to severe collateral damage. The concept of pinpoint bombing achieved at 5000 feet on a calm clear day over Arizona, was much less attainable from 25000 feet over German flak filled skies, often through heavy cloud coverage and varying wind.conditions.
Furthermore, any attempts at moral judgments of the Allied war effort through the lens of 2007 ideology inevitably results in a blurred, distorted image.

_________________
b17sam
35 B17 missions (9/6/44 Ludwigshafen to 2/3/45 Berlin)
click on http://www.b17sam.com


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Sep 04, 2007 1:08 pm 
Offline
S/N Geek
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 29, 2004 8:31 pm
Posts: 3790
Location: Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
As an Ottawa resident and Canadian I have been following this discussion/battle with great interest ever since the museum opened at the new location. I am disappointed as to how it turned out. Crews followed orders, commands set the targets and shedule. Even when considering that I don't think the command chain can be blamed for targetting sites close to civilians. The allies didn't start the war, but they sure finished it. It was also a very different time. My grandmother who spent her late teen years following the events of the second world war said "It was a matter of kill or be killed." I consider her to be one of the kindest rational people I know, and she knew the hand that was delt.

I am dissappointed how this issue has turned out with the museum. The bomb campaigns were as described. I don't think there is any shame in saying exactly that.

Mike

_________________
Mike R. Henniger
Aviation Enthusiast & Photographer
http://www.AerialVisuals.ca
http://www.facebook.com/AerialVisuals

Do you want to find locations of displayed, stored or active aircraft? Then start with the The Locator.
Do you want to find or contribute to the documented history of an aircraft? If so then start with the Airframes Database.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Sep 04, 2007 1:12 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon May 28, 2007 7:10 pm
Posts: 648
Location: tempe, az
How would a survivor of Dresden feel about the plaque?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Sep 04, 2007 2:03 pm 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 30, 2004 7:13 pm
Posts: 5664
Location: Minnesota, USA
michaelharadon wrote:
How would a survivor of Dresden feel about the plaque?


"How on earth could we have let someone like Hitler take control."

_________________
It was a good idea, it just didn't work.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Sep 04, 2007 2:42 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 30, 2006 5:47 pm
Posts: 226
Location: Ontario, Canada
As a Canadian, I am extremely upset by the insinuation contained within the wording of the plaque. Why didn't they tell the world that we were/are a volunteer military - then they could really make us look like assassins.

As a military historian who came up through the ranks the hard way (with a high school education), I get the impression that this plaque was worded by a PhD who never wore a uniform.

I'm getting tired of apologizing for my country having to defend itself.

Doug 8)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Sep 04, 2007 2:59 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2005 11:19 am
Posts: 800
Location: Vancouver BC
Personally, I feel that the wording on the plaque sounds almost apologetic, which somewhat offends me, and should offend the memory of those who served and died fighting against Hitler and his minions.

"Bomber Command's aim was to crush civilian morale and force Germany to surrender by destroying its cities and industrial installations". Sounds like Bomber Command's aim was to win the war by disabling its enemy. Perhaps we should have sent in individual special forces teams to root out each and every cottage-industry level workshop until the war was over. That and lots of leaflets would have done the job much more cleanly, without all that needless waste of life. :roll:

And the guy from Dresden should have a chat with a guy from London...

gv


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Sep 04, 2007 3:53 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Apr 25, 2007 8:08 am
Posts: 563
Location: Copperas Cove Texas
Sounds like that the Museum must of hired somebody from the Washington DC Museum that was part of the Enola Gay Display ! Even though the Dispaly was set up in such away that no one should be offened it was because the Museum staff kept telling everybody that they were sorry and even told a Japanese Anbasdor that when he can to see the Museum in general . that drew such a fuss of the A bombs being drop on Japan ! made it out like it was the United States Fault that Pearl Harbor was attacked ! IF WE ARE NOT CAREFUL THE SO CALLED History no it alls will reright History as we know it ! My Sons Jr High History Book states that their was only 10 State that Joined the Confederate States Of America What Happen to the other three states ? That are supposely in the Stars and Bars Flag were they just added to make it even ?

_________________
Always Keep Em Flying !

Glen

Lookie Capt Jim! Wham! Wham! ...............................Termights


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Sep 04, 2007 4:28 pm 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 02, 2006 9:10 am
Posts: 9720
Location: Pittsburgher misplaced in Oshkosh
b17sam wrote:
As a veteran of 35 bombing missions with the 8th Air Force, 91st Bomb Group, I can testify that all missions, bar none, were briefed for a military or industrial target. It is true that many of these targets were erected in areas adjacent to civlian housing, schools, hospitals, etc., and were thus subject to severe collateral damage. The concept of pinpoint bombing achieved at 5000 feet on a calm clear day over Arizona, was much less attainable from 25000 feet over German flak filled skies, often through heavy cloud coverage and varying wind.conditions.
Furthermore, any attempts at moral judgments of the Allied war effort through the lens of 2007 ideology inevitably results in a blurred, distorted image.


I am with you. And thank you for your service. Because of you and the many others like you, I can write this in English.

_________________
Chris Henry
EAA Aviation Museum Manager


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Sep 04, 2007 5:17 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 16, 2004 7:18 am
Posts: 671
Location: Berkshire, UK
War crime my ass..............makes my blood boil, the Germans started the concept of mass bombing of civilian areas when they started bombing London, Coventry, Bristol etc in 1940/41.

You wouldn't have found many people in the UK during WW2 who would NOT have wanted to do the same back and more once we got the chance. My Mother can still recall vividly having to run to the air-raid shelters and sit tight while listening to the thud and crump of exploding bombs thinking the next one will get them.......

And as for Dresden, I'll relate a little storey about that. About 25 years ago I my then boss at work I found out had been a Lancaster Navigator. He seemed reluctant to talk at all about his wartime service, but many vets don't so I didn't think much of it. Years later after he retired I found out from our secretary, who had been his secretary at the time, that he had been on the Dresden raid. How did she know....?
Because she was German, and he knew she had been a little girl living in Dresden at the time of the raid, and so had to speek to her about it............. :shock:
She however, had thought the world of him as a boss, and never held a grudge, and as she said to me on the subject, "It was the price we (meaning Germany) had to pay"


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Sep 04, 2007 8:08 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club

Joined: Mon May 03, 2004 1:05 am
Posts: 3236
Firebird wrote:
Germans started the concept of mass bombing of civilian areas when they started bombing London, Coventry, Bristol etc in 1940/41.


Actually, the Germans began this practice in Spain. Guernica, to be precise. Bombed the craddle of Basque Nationalism to terrorize the basques. German "Kultur" to put it succintly.

The Italians were not far behind in the practice of this way to wage war, when they subjugated the Ethiopians with bombings and with gas attacks....

Tulio

_________________
Why take the best part of life out of your life, when you can have life with the best part of your life in your life?

I am one of them 'futbol' people.

Will the previous owner has pics of this double cabin sample

GOOD MORNING, WELCOME TO THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Press "1" for English.
Press "2" to disconnect until you have learned to speak English.


Sooooo, how am I going to know to press 1 or 2, if I do not speak English????


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Sep 04, 2007 8:11 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jul 31, 2005 11:58 am
Posts: 214
Location: northeastern US
Here's a thought: Maybe if the Germans (or Japanese) didn't allow their government(s) to drag them into a worldwide conflagration, they wouldn't have had their cities burned to the ground. These people didn't seem overly bothered when their respective air forces started bombing population centers of questionable military importance (Warsaw, Rotterdam, London, Shanghai, and scores of others). I guess we're supposed to feel bad because we did it far better than they did? WTF?????

War is a very brutal and ugly business. It's about exterting more force against your enemy than he can exert on you. Outside the very vague limits imposed by international law, pretty much anything else goes. Kill a couple hundred thousand (innocent?) people along the way? Tough cr@p. It's a war not a friggin football game. This misguided concept of a humane war and/or a fair fight is a load of BS and best left to fantasy writers and Hollywood 'docu-dramas'.

No. No. Given the technology available to them, and viewed from the context of the day, the aircrew did exactly what was asked of them and did it remarkably well.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 43 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 236 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group