sabredriver wrote:
Anyone agree?
Not with you, no.
The deaths at Reno are terrible, but there are perfectly good regulatory bodies and no one is forced to race at Reno (nor are there passengers). No spectators were hurt either. Many of the existing safeguards are therefore working, to some degree.
Of course there are concerns, as there should be. There are proper processes to follow, where concern exists, and there are times when discussion online has a place, but that needs to be structured and led by qualified people and be constructive and informed.
I've talked to people responsible for airshow safety in the UK, US, France, Canada, Australia and New Zealand. Generally good work is done in those countries, but it's a sad universal that each nationality is quick to criticise failures of the other country's safety systems, while having little problem excusing their own. This despite there being a lot to learn from each other. Given (as an aviation journalist) I wouldn't place too much weight on the opinion of a foreign expert, I'm not going to give any weight to an unqualified foreign observer's internet opinion, such as yours. The apparent right to an opinion does not imply it being worth anything. That comes from a degree of thought and analysis, and qualification or experience.
Regards,