Warbird Information Exchange

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this site are the responsibility of the poster and do not reflect the views of the management.
It is currently Fri Aug 29, 2025 11:15 am

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Classic Wings Magazine WWII Naval Aviation Research Pacific Luftwaffe Resource Center
When Hollywood Ruled The Skies - Volumes 1 through 4 by Bruce Oriss


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 13 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Fri Oct 12, 2007 4:49 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 12, 2006 6:37 pm
Posts: 1812
Location: Spring, TEXAS
This is the first time I've seen this. The center pontoon retracts as the bottom of the fuselage. What is this?

http://www.strangemilitary.com/content/item/130988.html

_________________
Never drive faster than your Guardian Angel can fly!!

http://www.390th.org/
www.LSFM.org

Trae


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Oct 12, 2007 5:32 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jan 01, 2005 11:26 pm
Posts: 117
Location: wichita
Blackburn B-20


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Oct 12, 2007 5:35 pm 
Offline
a.k.a. TBDude
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 14, 2006 10:54 pm
Posts: 625
Location: Southern California
What's the advantage? Prop clearance?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Oct 12, 2007 7:53 pm 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club

Joined: Wed May 05, 2004 3:45 pm
Posts: 2645
TBDude wrote:
What's the advantage? Prop clearance?


Less drag while flying.

Regards,
Mike


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Oct 12, 2007 8:09 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri May 21, 2004 11:31 am
Posts: 609
Location: A pool in Palm Springs
Actually its designed to keep mechanics busy!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Oct 12, 2007 8:52 pm 
Offline
a.k.a. TBDude
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 14, 2006 10:54 pm
Posts: 625
Location: Southern California
But why bother with the added weight and mechanical complexity of an enormous extending center pontoon -- rather than a conventional flying boat hull?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Oct 12, 2007 9:08 pm 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 10, 2004 4:43 pm
Posts: 7501
Location: northern ohio
wacky looking thing. how many prototypes?? any additional pics?? or history??

_________________
tom d. friedman - hey!!! those fokkers were messerschmitts!! * without ammunition, the usaf would be just another flying club!!! * better to have piece of mind than piece of tail!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Oct 12, 2007 10:08 pm 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Sat Nov 25, 2006 9:18 pm
Posts: 2275
Location: Vancouver, BC
Seems ridiculous to me. I want to hear the rationale behind it.

A agree that the added weight of the contraption totally offset the gain in aerodynamics.

Cheers,

David


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Oct 12, 2007 10:55 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jan 01, 2005 11:26 pm
Posts: 117
Location: wichita
The Float was designed to keep the props clear of the water without excessive hull depth, and to obtain large angles of wing incidence on take-off without the penalty of an awkward nose-down . drag producing cruising attitude. Quoted from Putnam Blackburn Aircraft since 1909.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Oct 12, 2007 11:10 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 12, 2006 6:37 pm
Posts: 1812
Location: Spring, TEXAS
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blackburn_B-20

_________________
Never drive faster than your Guardian Angel can fly!!

http://www.390th.org/
www.LSFM.org

Trae


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Oct 13, 2007 6:44 am 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 10, 2004 4:43 pm
Posts: 7501
Location: northern ohio
respectable speed with all that drag. the profile shot does it more justice.

_________________
tom d. friedman - hey!!! those fokkers were messerschmitts!! * without ammunition, the usaf would be just another flying club!!! * better to have piece of mind than piece of tail!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Oct 13, 2007 8:40 am 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Sat Nov 25, 2006 9:18 pm
Posts: 2275
Location: Vancouver, BC
Wow, I'm impressed. That is quite a decent speed for something like that.

-David


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Oct 14, 2007 7:58 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 28, 2007 4:46 pm
Posts: 1523
Location: Brenham, Texas
Way to go Trae. Not many flying boats are totally new to me but that gobbler was a total surprise!

The B-20 came out in a time when number of flying boat designs were around, both good and bad. Wikipedia says two were built. The crew got scared of it and baled out. geez! It lost the competition to the Saunders-Roe Lerwick, which was a big enough turkey in its own right. Only 21 of those were delivered and withdrawn by mid '41 except for one short strength sqn. flying Arctic convoy patrol. The Lerwick was replaced by the CATALINA * (No I'm not biased at all.)

Canso42

* The Encylclopedia of Aircraft, Thunder Bay Press, 2004. p. 434.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 13 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 39 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group