Warbird Information Exchange

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this site are the responsibility of the poster and do not reflect the views of the management.
It is currently Thu Jun 19, 2025 4:09 am

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Classic Wings Magazine WWII Naval Aviation Research Pacific Luftwaffe Resource Center
When Hollywood Ruled The Skies - Volumes 1 through 4 by Bruce Oriss


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 32 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Nov 14, 2007 3:52 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 26, 2007 4:07 pm
Posts: 623
Location: Moorpark, CA
I upgraded from the D50 to the D80 and have no regrets. I got mine at Canoga Camera for $874.

The 18-200 is a good lens, but will definitely be too short for anything in the air. You want at least 300, and that will come up short for some things as well. I started with teh 70-300, which served me well until I upgraded to the Sigma 50-500.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Nov 14, 2007 4:35 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 869
Location: Littleton,Colorado
I just got the package from Amazon. I hope put it through the tests this weekend.
I just got the 18-200mm f/3.5-5.6 G ED-IF AF-S VR Zoom-Nikkor Lens. I know it may not be as good as a 300, but I
have to use the camera for kids/holidays and such, so I went with a good all around lens.
Hopefully, by the end of this year or the start of the next, I may be able to upgrade a bit. I will see how it goes. Anything will be better than the Kodak Z7590 Zoom I had.

Regards,

_________________
Live the Good Life
Bluedharma
http://flickr.com/photos/bluedharma/
http://www.airport-data.com/photographe ... arma;1045/
bluedharmawix@gmail.com
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Nov 14, 2007 8:36 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 26, 2007 4:07 pm
Posts: 623
Location: Moorpark, CA
From what I have read, the Nikkor 18-200 VR lens is a sweet lens. I plan on picking one up in the next couple of months. I want a little more reach for my air-to-air lens and that should definitely do it.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Nov 15, 2007 9:41 am 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club

Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2005 7:26 pm
Posts: 4969
Location: PA
vg-photo wrote:
From what I have read, the Nikkor 18-200 VR lens is a sweet lens. I plan on picking one up in the next couple of months. I want a little more reach for my air-to-air lens and that should definitely do it.



As I have learned the 200mm lens will not get you the results you will desire. The 70-300mm is the way to go.

Good luck with it,
Nate

_________________
Shop the Airplane Bunker At
www.warbirdbunker.com


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Nov 15, 2007 10:18 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 30, 2006 10:28 pm
Posts: 254
Location: East Texas
Nathan wrote:
vg-photo wrote:
From what I have read, the Nikkor 18-200 VR lens is a sweet lens. I plan on picking one up in the next couple of months. I want a little more reach for my air-to-air lens and that should definitely do it.



As I have learned the 200mm lens will not get you the results you will desire. The 70-300mm is the way to go.

Good luck with it,
Nate


VG-
I disagree with Nathan's statement; the 18-200 lens should be great for air-to-air shots...maybe he's thinking of ground-to-air, where 300mm would be a bare minimum.

-Pat

_________________
Trust me, I know what I'm doing.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Nov 15, 2007 10:30 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 869
Location: Littleton,Colorado
vg-photo and Pat,
Thanks for your messages! And I think you are correct.

Nathan,
I agree that the bare minimum is 300 if you are doing ground to air shots. However, many of my shots are up close as well as distant.
I needed a good all around lens to handle everything.
I didn't want to be changing the lens in a dust filled environment at air shows all the time.
Image Image

I really think I made a great choice. At this point I am definitely at amateur status.
Once my hobby matures, I think the 300mm - 400mm will be the way to go. As for now, the 18 to 200 should work just fine with the air shows in the area.

However,
Nathan, I want to thank you for your advice on the D80.
I used your posts in the past as a guide to what I was going to get.
I think I will be very happy with the D80 camera body.
Whatever the lens, I think the D80 will be great!
Best Regards,

_________________
Live the Good Life
Bluedharma
http://flickr.com/photos/bluedharma/
http://www.airport-data.com/photographe ... arma;1045/
bluedharmawix@gmail.com
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Nov 15, 2007 3:36 pm 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 02, 2006 9:10 am
Posts: 9720
Location: Pittsburgher misplaced in Oshkosh
So I just got an 18 -200 lense. How well is that going to work for ground to air. Anyone have any examples?

_________________
Chris Henry
EAA Aviation Museum Manager


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: D80 is a winner for me!
PostPosted: Sun Nov 18, 2007 10:44 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 869
Location: Littleton,Colorado
I tried out my D80 this weekend.
I think I have a winner.
Much better image quality. The Kodak picture was the best picture I could get.
The D80 picture had to be reduced in quality just to post it on here.
Can't wait to get some warbirds with this!

KODAK PICTURE
Image

D80 PICTURE Nikkor 18-200 VR lens
Image

_________________
Live the Good Life
Bluedharma
http://flickr.com/photos/bluedharma/
http://www.airport-data.com/photographe ... arma;1045/
bluedharmawix@gmail.com
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Nov 19, 2007 12:57 am 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 02, 2006 9:10 am
Posts: 9720
Location: Pittsburgher misplaced in Oshkosh
So I got to ask, which is better the old D-50 that I had, or the new D-40?

_________________
Chris Henry
EAA Aviation Museum Manager


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Nov 19, 2007 9:52 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 869
Location: Littleton,Colorado
Good question.
I test drove a friends D-50 prior to my D-80 purchase.
The D-50 is a great camera.
I don't know if D-40 vs. D-50 are about the same or not.
I think the D40 has 10.2 megapixel, but the older D-50 only had 6.1 megapixel???

_________________
Live the Good Life
Bluedharma
http://flickr.com/photos/bluedharma/
http://www.airport-data.com/photographe ... arma;1045/
bluedharmawix@gmail.com
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: D80 rules
PostPosted: Fri Feb 01, 2008 4:01 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Nov 13, 2007 4:46 am
Posts: 6
Location: Mummel NSW Australia
Hi Guys, Have been listening intently on your conversation about cameras and lenses and such for a while now. As I am new to this forum stuff I have been slow in jumping in and having a go. But here goes. As I live downunder I have limited access to warbird shows, but the scene is growing slowly. To take my warbird shots I began with a nikon 401s 35mm with 70-300mm lens. Took great shots but after useing 30 rolls of 36 exposure film in 3 days at Wanaka NZ I took the plunge to digital. A D70s with a 70-300mm lens was my choice, excellent results only draw back 6.1mp was a tad small for A3 prints. Santa bought me a D80 nikon plus a sigma 170-500mm lens and to cap it off a nikon 18-200vr lens. The sigma goes on the D80 for Ground to air and the 200 on the D70s for all ground shots. Let you now hows it all works next week. Cheers John


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Feb 01, 2008 3:31 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 21, 2007 8:45 pm
Posts: 1094
Location: Kimberley, B. C. Canada
The 18-200 Nikkor is a superb "walking around" lens, but the quality drops off a bit out toward 200 mm, at least on my example. My standards are very high, as I shoot for publication, but I consider this lens for my purposes more like a great 18-150 lens with 200 mm available in an emergency. The newest version of the Nikkor 70- 300 is getting good reviews and is relatively affordable. Just make sure you are looking at the one labelled VR and AFS.

Excellent and respected reviews of lenses and Nikon cameras here:

http://www.bythom.com/nikon.htm

70-300:

http://www.bythom.com/70300VRlens.htm

300 mm F4 -- more specialized and expensive, but a truly superb lens:

http://www.bythom.com/300AFSlens.htm

_________________
Neal Nurmi

---Wingman Photo---


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Feb 02, 2008 12:28 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Nov 13, 2007 4:46 am
Posts: 6
Location: Mummel NSW Australia
Thanks for the heads up on the 18-200. I have just in the last week started playing with it, mostly around 70-120 focal range.  I hope to be over in canada next year as my brother and I will be going to Duxford and Biggin Hill and stop over in Canada. Do you know if Hastings and London (canada) still have their shows? If yes do you know  the time of year they are held?   cheers John


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Feb 02, 2008 12:31 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Nov 13, 2007 4:46 am
Posts: 6
Location: Mummel NSW Australia
Thanks for the heads up on the 18-200. I have just in the last week started playing with it, mostly around 70-120 focal range.  I hope to be over in canada next year as my brother and I will be going to Duxford and Biggin Hill and stop over in Canada. Do you know if Hastings and London (canada) still have their shows? If yes do you know  the time of year they are held?   cheers John


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Feb 02, 2008 12:33 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Nov 13, 2007 4:46 am
Posts: 6
Location: Mummel NSW Australia
Thanks for the heads up on the 18-200. I have just in the last week started playing with it, mostly around 70-120 focal range.  I hope to be over in canada next year as my brother and I will be going to Duxford and Biggin Hill and stop over in Canada. Do you know if Hastings and London (canada) still have their shows? If yes do you know  the time of year they are held?   cheers John


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 32 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group