I guess I could title this "The Good, The Bad, and the Ugly."
That perhaps best describes the course this situation has taken over the course of the last few days. I've been in the middle of all three, still with no resolution. Or redemtion.
The "Good" is the number of calls and the positive response I've had from people whom I've never met. The "Bad" is still this situation - bad in that the cockpit was taken (and perhaps my mood for calling the person who took it a "thief" - but I'm not here to argue the semantics of the word, but rather to see a nothing other than resolution). The ugly? How that'd be a phone call I received this afternoon while on the I-10.....
That'd be a "Restricted" call - one that does not show a telephone number of the caller, nor does it permit me to respond back to the number, even to allow them to remain anonymous....
"Yeah, about the cockpit you say was stolen... I can tell you for a fact you're not gonna see it again and that's just tough s--t for you," caller said.
"And why is that?" I enquired. "How come?"
"The guy who took it spent a lot of money to get it out of there, you didn't do anything with it, and putting it in a so-called 'museum' I can't even find on the net is a bunch of BS," he said. "And if you really cared about the airplane you'd be flying them instead of cutting them up, a-hole. Hope someone steals all of your stuff."
And with that, a hang-up. Call terminated.
Yeah, I'm still a little stunned. Whether it was a poor attempt at a joke, or someone's real feelings on the matter, I certainly don't know. It seems rather childish, and I can only hope it was a lark. But it was a deliberate message, from whomever.
Obviously, someone decided to take a shot knowing I'm not one to hide behind a curtain of mystery. In an attempt to get my airplane cockpit back, I've been pretty open about who I am and how to reach me, and will continue to do so.
Is there a need to clarify this situation further? Maybe. For the record, I'm not an airplane scrapper. Far from it. I've spent the last three decades of my life trying to save this stuff, and for me it has a lot of personal meaning. "The Admiral" was not my airplane to begin with and the owner wanted it gone for many reasosn that I was not able to overcome. Sadly, I had offered to buy the entire airplane and save it (though operating a C-54 is waaaay out of my economic means) but owner insisted on a price that was not realistic. In the end, after buying the nose section, the rest of the metal that went to the Chinese scrap merchants netted him less than 25 percent of what I had offered for the plane.
Museums? I've dealt with many of them in-country and around the world, and I've learned a fancy website does not a museum make. Wingspan may not have the website for your review and approval, but give 'em time. And to whom one gives something is a personal decision and really doesn't factor into the issue at hand. They're good folks, and their tax status or ability to find them on the net doesn't really matter to me. Don't listen to me - I'm just a crazy lunatic missing parts. Give 'em a call yourself and test the water.
Craig, I remember you well from toiling in the heat on your AeroCommander more than a year ago. We had a sad laugh at our combined fates - it was your a/c that struck the tail section of our 'Poon - 57C - when some ne'r do well kids decided to hook up your plane to the back of a pickup truck and make it fly one night out there. We found the beer bottles and the damage to figure out what happened.
Helldivers, I agree with you 100 percent. Get the facts. Whether this was a statement for all to ponder or a sideways slam at me for going off on the individual who took my stuff, I'm not sure. I DID let my personal opinion cloud the facts as presented earlier. Remove my tagline on the individual who took the cockpit, and the rest is submitted as just that. Fact. The 5 Ws - Who, What, When, Where, Why.
CAPFlyer is right. No need to place a tag on the individual whom I'm at odds with - I need to remain neutral. But it's hard to feel warm and fuzzy toward somone who takes something from you without your knowledge, permission or consent. As a child I was told this kind of act was stealing, and one who did this sort of thing wasn't a nice person and had a name or two attached. But maybe that's the nasty Alpha male in me rearing its ugly head. I have a very defined sense of right and wrong and because of my direct involvement in this issue, I take it kinda personal. If I offended you, it was not inentional. You're far more liberal than I (no slam intended), and I have been told I could use more than just a little tollerance toward others. But I certainly didn't get this ugly face from backing away from fights, either.
I sense through reading and re-reading these posts (and leaving out the whack-job imbecile who called me) that I'm to consider the possibility that there has been a "misunderstanding" and "perhaps I am not the only wronged party in this affair." That possibly someone went to considerable time and expense and effort to "save" something that had already been saved.
OK, sounds plausible. But as of this afternoon, I still have no calls from another party or reliable source on this matter (I'll discount the crank call, as I can only hope to God such people don't congregate - or breed). No e-mails with an attempt to tell another side of a story, so...
I guess I wait. A little irritated, but with tempered patience. Deep breath. OK, there's my side. Let's hear the other - something. Anything?
-Pooner
Rob Kropp (602) 708-3942
|