Warbird Information Exchange

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this site are the responsibility of the poster and do not reflect the views of the management.
It is currently Mon Mar 30, 2026 2:14 pm

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Classic Wings Magazine WWII Naval Aviation Research Pacific Luftwaffe Resource Center
When Hollywood Ruled The Skies - Volumes 1 through 4 by Bruce Oriss


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 15 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: Tortured B-17s - Pt. III
PostPosted: Thu Jan 10, 2008 11:03 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 23, 2007 3:36 pm
Posts: 496
Location: "Fly Over Country" St. Louis, Missouri
and a few more from the Prairie Aviation Museum in Bloomington, IL photos.

Enjoy the Day! Mark

This one is interesting in that there are names on the engine cowlings. The right outboard says "Rosalie", the left inboard says "Kitten" and the left outboard says "Pyska's Pet".
Image

Image

This looks like a gear collapse after leaving the runway. There's a small tracked vehicle under the left wing between the engine nacelles.
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jan 11, 2008 1:24 am 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 28, 2006 12:56 pm
Posts: 3442
Location: North of Texas, South of Kansas
Naming engines is interesting. I recently read a story about the copilot of a B-24 naming each engine after one of four girlfriends. He named them based on how easy or hard they were to get started, just like his girlfriends! 8)

Scott


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jan 11, 2008 1:47 am 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jan 14, 2006 7:18 pm
Posts: 2101
Location: Meriden,Ct.
Only mechanic's should name engines :evil:

Phil

_________________
A man's got to know his limitations.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jan 11, 2008 1:54 am 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 28, 2006 12:56 pm
Posts: 3442
Location: North of Texas, South of Kansas
Phil,

Until I read the little story I just posted, I thought the mechanics DID name their engines. The logic behind his naming practice is beyond reproach, though! :)

Scott


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jan 11, 2008 4:14 am 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member

Joined: Sat Dec 22, 2007 12:36 am
Posts: 7961
Location: Mt. Vernon, WA.
Looks like #3 & #4 weren't making any revs judging by the unbent prop blades

_________________
Don't make me go get my flying monkeys-


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jan 11, 2008 9:13 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 23, 2007 3:36 pm
Posts: 496
Location: "Fly Over Country" St. Louis, Missouri
In the full rez scan, it looked to me as if the left main gear failed fully or got stripped off and the right gear either sank into the ground or only partially failed/retracted, hence the right side props were saved from ground contact.

Enjoy the Day! Mark


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jan 11, 2008 9:36 am 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club

Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2007 11:27 am
Posts: 2463
Location: Ellerslie Georgia, USA
Actually, the left main gear appears to be bent towards the bomb bay

_________________
Kind Regards,
Gary Lewis
J.A.F.O.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jan 11, 2008 12:49 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 18, 2006 3:08 pm
Posts: 4542
Location: chicago
more great pics Mark. Thanks!

You might want to consider starting a single thread and just adding them in additional posts to keep it all in one place. I just found part 1 and 2. Maybe name it after the museum so it's easier for you and all of us patiently waiting for all the images you can scan! :lol:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Jan 12, 2008 4:12 am 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member

Joined: Sat Dec 22, 2007 12:36 am
Posts: 7961
Location: Mt. Vernon, WA.
Groundloop? If so, I'll bet that was exciting for all on hand!!

_________________
Don't make me go get my flying monkeys-


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jan 15, 2008 9:09 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jul 19, 2005 1:14 am
Posts: 854
Wonderful stuff, Mark.

Apparently that first Fort lasted less than a month with its combat group. According to info on this page, it was assigned to the 487th BG on August 2nd, 1944 and was scrapped on the 31st of August.

Here's some info about the accident...

AAIR Search Result For Serial Number: 42-98020


On the same Fort, can you tell us what the markings between the serial number and 'L' are?


Thanks for posting these...


Fade to Black...


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jan 15, 2008 10:39 am 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 28, 2006 12:56 pm
Posts: 3442
Location: North of Texas, South of Kansas
Peter-Four-Oh,

Those numbers are sometimes referred to as modification numbers. On another website there was a long discussion about them, and most B-17s that have the numbers on the vertical also have the same numbers on the nose near the cheek windows. I forget the mechanics of the numbering system, but the idea is similar to the Mod numbers on early B-29s. They denote where the aircraft went through a Mod Center and it's individual number while there (if I recall). I had never noticed the small stencils until a year or so ago when I read about them, and now I see them on many period photos.

Scott


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jan 16, 2008 9:19 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 23, 2007 3:36 pm
Posts: 496
Location: "Fly Over Country" St. Louis, Missouri
Hi Steve -

Here's a close up of the vertical fin:

Image

I also see it on the left front section of the fuselage, just aft and a bit lower than the cheek gun, just as you noted.

Thanks! Mark


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jan 16, 2008 10:28 am 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 28, 2006 12:56 pm
Posts: 3442
Location: North of Texas, South of Kansas
Okay,

I went to the other forum's archives and found the information pertaining to the small codes on the tail of 42-98020. Unfortunately, no real solid information is available, but the code is on the nose of the aircraft as well. Now look at our example:
Image
You may have to put on the reading glasses, but just below the pitot tube is the P38 stencil, with the separate 38 just below it. This is the same situation that was noticed by other folks on quite a number of Forts, including some F models. Notice that the tail stencil seems to show an F rather than the P, but if you look closely at Mark's enlargement it appears that the paint flaked off of a P to make an F.
The codes on most of the other airplanes cited also had the P38 upper code with a different number below. Apparently, the P38 is a project number or mod center code? and the lower number is the ship number. Somebody must know.

The mystery deepens-------!
Scott


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jan 16, 2008 10:58 am 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jun 03, 2006 10:08 pm
Posts: 1182
Location: Tulsa, OK
Question on a similar subject- does anyone know how the B-24 mods were coded? Was it similar to the B-17 codes that are currently being discussed? With one B-24 I have studied, the Tulsamerican, you can see that at the factory it carried the block number "10". Upon arrival in Italy, after it was modified in Birmingham, Alabama, the block number had been changed to "11". Were there any other such changes?

kevin

Image

Image

_________________
FOUND the elusive DT-built B-24! Woo-hoo!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jan 16, 2008 11:11 am 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 28, 2006 12:56 pm
Posts: 3442
Location: North of Texas, South of Kansas
Kevin,

I wish the B-17 code thingy was as simple as a block number change, but no records have surfaced yet as to how to decode the puzzle. The block number change on Tulsamerican should be easier to dig out if one has access to the Mod Center records or B-24 Mod Change Tech Orders. The B-29 has it's own can of worms regarding the fuselage numbers on earlier airplanes that hasn't been completely ironed out, but Bob Mann has gone a long way with that one.

Sorry for hijacking again, :oops:
Scott


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 15 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Chris Brame, Google [Bot] and 79 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group