Warbird Information Exchange

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this site are the responsibility of the poster and do not reflect the views of the management.
It is currently Sun Jun 22, 2025 12:58 am

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Classic Wings Magazine WWII Naval Aviation Research Pacific Luftwaffe Resource Center
When Hollywood Ruled The Skies - Volumes 1 through 4 by Bruce Oriss


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 45 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jan 03, 2005 2:36 am 
Offline
Been here a long time
Been here a long time

Joined: Sun May 02, 2004 1:16 am
Posts: 11324
I thought the movie was fantastic. It was an aviation movie done well!

Compared to trash like Pearl Harbor, I thought it was well acted and pretty factual (not that I'm an expert of course). There are always a few nits to pick, but only a fraction of those seen in other recent Hollywood blockbusters that come to mind.

It was long but interesting, unlike Titanic- which was just long!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jan 03, 2005 8:58 am 
Offline
Maker of Spiffy models
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 30, 2004 6:50 pm
Posts: 1883
Location: Montréal
The H-1 flew with two kind of wings :

- short ones for the speed record

- long ones for the cross-country flight.

No?

In the movie you see the shor-winged one, while Jim Wright's had the long wings.

:?: :roll: :shock:

_________________
Olivier Lacombe -- Harvard Mk.4 C-GBQB


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Model Connie
PostPosted: Mon Jan 03, 2005 6:41 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun May 02, 2004 8:30 pm
Posts: 112
Noticed that Trippe had a model of the Connie on his desk, in a scene before that program had even begun. Thoguht the S-38 shots were CG for some reason - can't tell real from fake anymore! And what wsa the CG bomber - a Keystone? Martin?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jan 03, 2005 6:58 pm 
Offline
Maker of Spiffy models
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 30, 2004 6:50 pm
Posts: 1883
Location: Montréal
The CG bad-ass plane is the Hughes XF-11, a recce bird!

8)

_________________
Olivier Lacombe -- Harvard Mk.4 C-GBQB


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: CG bomber
PostPosted: Mon Jan 03, 2005 7:34 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 07, 2004 2:02 am
Posts: 4701
Location: Yucca Valley, CA
If you mean the one in the "Hell's Angels" sequence, it was supposed to be the Sikorsky S-29A in its final role as a Gotha. By the way, whose Boeing 100/P-12 was that - the one they knocked the top wing off of to make it go faster :?

_________________
Image
All right, Mister Dorfmann, start pullin'!
Pilot: "Flap switch works hard in down position."
Mechanic: "Flap switch checked OK. Pilot needs more P.T." - Flight report, TB-17G 42-102875 (Hobbs AAF)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Movie
PostPosted: Mon Jan 03, 2005 7:36 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun May 02, 2004 7:22 am
Posts: 939
Location: Texas
I thought the movie was well done. For some of the little things they were alittle "off" on they did ALOT right! Radial engine noises were different between aircraft... Glow of the exhaust on the S-38 at night!

I think you might be wondering about the bomber in the Hell's Angels part. Roscoe Turner rented his Sikorsky "bomber" to Hughes as a "Gotha Bomber" for Hell's Angels and I thought maybe that is what they were trying to depict. It crashed during the filming.

Yes... the H-1 had two different wings. Many sharp eyes caught that both were depicted!

_________________
Blue Skies,
Dan
http://www.flytoanothertime.com


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jan 03, 2005 8:56 pm 
Offline
Maker of Spiffy models
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 30, 2004 6:50 pm
Posts: 1883
Location: Montréal
S-38 is a real one, hence the nice glow!

And that was aboot the bipe bomber, eh? Sorry!

So, was the replica Hughes H-1 used in the movie or not?

:?:

_________________
Olivier Lacombe -- Harvard Mk.4 C-GBQB


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Model Connie
PostPosted: Sun Jan 09, 2005 2:36 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun May 02, 2004 8:30 pm
Posts: 112
mexchiwa wrote:
Noticed that Trippe had a model of the Connie on his desk, in a scene before that program had even begun. Thoguht the S-38 shots were CG for some reason - can't tell real from fake anymore! And what wsa the CG bomber - a Keystone? Martin?


Thinking about it later, it's probably a Boeing 314. Anyway, just a model in a movie... Thanks for the info about the bomber.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: H-1 RACER ,
PostPosted: Sun Jan 09, 2005 2:56 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue May 25, 2004 11:57 am
Posts: 168
Your right about the canopy, I noticed that too, I believe there where real shots of it where taken at Reno


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jan 09, 2005 6:06 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 29, 2004 10:18 pm
Posts: 953
Location: Republic of Maine
That sure did look like a Connie in Juan Trippes office! But a darn fine movie! 8) I have to say Leo DeCap played a pretty fair H.H. I might even forgive him the Titanic(forgive, not forget :roll: :wink: ) I noticed in the credits that he was one of the Exec Producers. Suppose he'll do more movies in this vein?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jan 09, 2005 9:16 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!

Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2004 9:08 pm
Posts: 1437
No Leo Decap romance like in the Titanic? Arghh, my lady friend won't want to see it.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jan 10, 2005 12:14 am 
Offline
Been here a long time
Been here a long time

Joined: Sun May 02, 2004 1:16 am
Posts: 11324
HarvardIV wrote:
No Leo Decap romance like in the Titanic? Arghh, my lady friend won't want to see it.
There is some female interest in the movie. My wife liked it.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jan 30, 2005 1:38 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Nov 13, 2004 12:11 pm
Posts: 78
Location: Finland
Excellent movie yes ! :prayer: :prayer: :prayer:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Howard_Hughes

through the link you'll find the XF-11 crash site in Beverly Hills.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jan 31, 2005 3:46 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Wed May 05, 2004 8:03 pm
Posts: 1081
Location: Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
Hi all--

Let the nitpicking begin, eh! :D Saw The Aviator Saturday evening (at a genuine 1930s Art Deco single-screen theatre, no less). Pretty decent overall, I think, from the limited knowledge I have of Mr Hughes' bio. The rivet-counting, of course, is one of the more enjoyable aspects of viewing a piece like this. Compared to something like Pearl Harbor, this one comes off pretty well with just minor niggles:

...would they really have assembled the H-1 completely, with rivets that look like they came off a warship, knowing what HH wanted? I think not...

...The H-1 wasn't really variable geometry, but yeah, as has been pointed out, she taxies out and takes off in her short-wing pylon racer configuration (BTW HH withdrew from the NAR one year because the H-1 would have waxed the field so thoroughly...rather gentlemanly that), then does her flybys with the long transcon-record wings (and a closed cockpit)! I kept thinking what a crying shame it was that they did not have the gorgeous Jim Wright H-1 at their disposal.

...I wondered about the Boeing 100 too; the wings were obvious mockups but the fuse and tail looked genuine. Kermit's hurricane-damaged one partially reassembled, maybe?? (Surely, though, not even the least knowledgeable moviegoer could be hoodwinked into accepting that the H-1 was a converted P-12...!)

...Alda accuses HH of misusing funds paid him by the USAF, which would, in 1947--never mind '44--have been a trick in itself since there was not yet a USAF to defraud!

...Yeah, the H-4 goes way higher than she really did...and what a sight, even in CGI! Hmm. Could she be restored and flown even today? The taxiing scenes of the H-4 were, I think, the most convincing CGI in the film. (Why oh why does the CGI WWI stuff move like RC models would??)

...That model on Trippe's desk does appear to be a Connie: but I wonder if they weren't trying to show us the DC-4E prototype, which had three fins. Would have to watch the scene again.

...Postwar stars-and-bars on the XF-11. Oh well.

...Yeah, the conversation in the S-38 was a bit sotto-voce for something with two big radials either side. But Kath Hepburn does mention that later on...admitting she talks so loud she can always be heard over the engines!

...I still think Leo diC is a mite youthful-looking to play HH, really; even in his earlier, saner playboy days he tended to have a stern look about him. But by the end of the flick he's got that perplexed, faintly angry look down very well. Are a cuiple of the B&W TV-monitor shots during the hearings actually Hughes, or still Leo? I can't tell.

...And yeah, the Brampton SE gets seen, Billy Bishop markings and all, in the first minute of the film; and also very clearly in one of the now-well-known publicity stills that show Leo diC getting in (or out of) the SE in period leather flight jacket--below the coaming can be read "Major William Avery Bishop VC"! BTW that SE is fullsize, and very convincing indeed. GWFM also have one of the 7/10 ones as a trainer.

Sooo...anyone have a few mil to put together a movie about the '49 NAR?

Cheers

S.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: the aviator
PostPosted: Fri Feb 04, 2005 11:24 pm 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 10, 2004 4:43 pm
Posts: 7501
Location: northern ohio
finally saw the aviator picture. it was very good. some minor quirks though..... flying sequences were great, but did anybody notice usaf star & bar on th xf 11 in 1946?? it was still army air force then. also no mention of hughes drug abuse after that crash, which really put him on the spiral down to the day he died, & his dope was central in his life from that time on. i was rather mystified at the portrayals of hughes repeating the same statement multiple times while slipping in temporary catatonic stupors?? after reading 4 books about him i never knew he did that!! an interesting question though....... is the hercules flying boat still the biggest plane to this day?? or is it the massive russian antonov cargo jet?? or does the new french airbus jet that is being built take the prize?? regards, tom

_________________
tom d. friedman - hey!!! those fokkers were messerschmitts!! * without ammunition, the usaf would be just another flying club!!! * better to have piece of mind than piece of tail!!


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 45 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 38 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group