The Inspector wrote:
'Factory fresh markings' brings to mind Bob Richardsons B-17F. After Bob passed the MoF 'assumed' they were meant to have the airplane since Bob had flown around for years with MoF decals on the nose. The airplane was carted off to Plant 2 down East Marginal Way for restoration by, I think BMA (Boeing Management Assn) and volunteers.
The Richardson family said 'hold the phone there pardner, that belongs to us, and wasn't mentioned in the will, you don't own it'
The airplane sits, inside Plant 2 restored to factory fresh status except for a really stupid looking 'BOEING BEE' nose art script painted on at the behest of some fat cat doner, all alone and where no one can see it or appreciate it, covered with dust.
I think there's more to the story here. I believe the Museum of Flight had signed legal documents between it and Richardson that specified the fate of the aircraft, and that is where the "no flying" part of the deal was done (as per Richardson's instructions). That the Museum of Flight still holds the airplane for future display is indicative of the legal standing of each party.
As for the name, it was a compromise between those that wanted nose art and those who didn't want anything except a factory fresh airplane. In my opinion, the nose markings are understated, reflect the style of the times, and don't seem particularly offensive.
The last I heard, the airplane is slated to be displayed when the next big airplane hangar is constructed by the Museum of Flight. Perhaps those who want it displayed really really badly will be donating money to get the hangar built.
Login
Register
FAQ
Search
