Warbird Information Exchange

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this site are the responsibility of the poster and do not reflect the views of the management.
It is currently Sat Jun 21, 2025 6:24 am

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Classic Wings Magazine WWII Naval Aviation Research Pacific Luftwaffe Resource Center
When Hollywood Ruled The Skies - Volumes 1 through 4 by Bruce Oriss


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 3 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: ETO vs. PTO
PostPosted: Sat Jan 08, 2005 11:42 pm 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jun 05, 2004 3:37 pm
Posts: 2755
Location: Dayton, OH
I was wondering if someone could clear up a couple of questions. First off why was the Aircraft coding worn by each plane in the European theatre not carried on to the Pacific theatre? What's the reason for the difference? Also does anyone know in the plans for the invasion of the Japanese main land. In the event that the Japanese did not capitulate or if the Bombs were'nt dropped, Were "D-Day" stripes or some sort of aircraft identification planned to be applied to allied aircraft? Thanks

Shay


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jan 09, 2005 12:55 pm 
Offline
Jump Street
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jul 11, 2004 9:08 pm
Posts: 345
Location: Willow Grove, PA
I can't be of great help, but there were ID bands on some of the PTO fighter aircraft in terms of large black bands on the fusealage and wings. check these pictures:

http://www.mustangsmustangs.net/p-51/p5 ... fic/10.jpg

http://www.mustangsmustangs.net/p-51/p5 ... fic/10.jpg

you can see the bands. i don't know if there were any other plans though to have the aircraft use 'dday' type ID.

as far as the coding, i'm not really sure, i could guess that there weren't as many fighter groups in the PTO as in the ETO so they could use a simple number system, which you see on a lot of the PTO planes. but this is all a guess.
wish i could be of more help, i'm sure someone here can direct you to a better answer.

brian


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jan 09, 2005 1:43 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 04, 2004 1:49 am
Posts: 659
My assumption would be that the USAAF copied RAF practice with squadron letter codes and individual letters in the ETO and did not in the Pacific, sticking to numbers or an individual code letter and number combination.

Dan


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 3 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 33 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group