Warbird Information Exchange

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this site are the responsibility of the poster and do not reflect the views of the management.
It is currently Sat Dec 20, 2025 4:36 am

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Classic Wings Magazine WWII Naval Aviation Research Pacific Luftwaffe Resource Center
When Hollywood Ruled The Skies - Volumes 1 through 4 by Bruce Oriss


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 37 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Tue May 27, 2008 3:38 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 31, 2005 1:40 pm
Posts: 936
Location: Deer Park, NY
Gents,

I just came across this on the ASB board:

http://www.flightglobal.com/articles/20 ... -show.html

Peter


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue May 27, 2008 3:49 pm 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club

Joined: Fri Sep 21, 2007 6:25 pm
Posts: 2760
Oh, no, not again! I don't know why the 109 series is so popular around the world? With it's vicious ground handling, even in extremely capable hands such as Eichhorns', I wonder why the 190 isn't more popular?

I don't know how many people know this, but Walter Eichhorn was checked out by the "Ace of Aces", 109 pilot Erich Hartmann (352 kills) back in the 80's.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue May 27, 2008 3:58 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Feb 12, 2005 10:26 pm
Posts: 942
Location: Greeley, CO
Never did understand why ol' Willy did'nt change the gear around and make them more like the Hurricane's once this problem was revealed....apparently he got really upset when told of the problem and never accepted responsibility for the flaw...

Glad the damage is light and the bird can be repaired....

M

_________________
Mark Morris


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue May 27, 2008 4:00 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 03, 2006 12:34 pm
Posts: 1275
Location: Houston, TX
With BF-109s groundlooping is a case of WHEN not IF.

Even "experten" would trash them from time to time, no matter how much experience they had.

That being said... Patch her up and get her flying again.

_________________
Support Your Local Warbirds! KBO!
The only reasons the airplanes matter is what the veterans did with them... and why.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue May 27, 2008 4:26 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Aug 04, 2006 10:20 am
Posts: 681
Location: Belgium
And the other EADS's 109 made a belly landing one month ago, also with Walter Eichhorn at the control, after a landing gear failure. Sad period for the Eads collection...

_________________
Sorry for my bad English:-(


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue May 27, 2008 4:44 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jul 03, 2006 2:01 pm
Posts: 353
109, spitfire and Hurricane, although remembered as WWII aircraft had their origins in another era. Biplanes and open cockpits and ground loops were the norm. Of the three, the Hurricane reached developepmental zenith rather early on. The Spit and 109 saw developement thru to the end of the war. The Spit was getting tired, but saw some futher developement still.

the 109's gear was probably never changed because despite the legendary status of "bad gear design", there was no outstanding problem until there were no veteran pilots with the requisite skill and training left to fly her.

IIRC, the B-26 had a bad reutation until the training improved. 109 was suddenly a bad design? Not logical.

_________________
Charles Neely


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue May 27, 2008 4:46 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 27, 2006 2:10 pm
Posts: 3257
Location: New York
A clip of the "crash landing" made my ISP's "Raw Video" feature this afternoon. He would've been okay except the right gear leg folded. The left one stayed extended and kept the prop clear of the ground; it was still turning when the bird came to rest, until he switched it off. The collapsed gear appeared to fold neatly into the well. So with luck it's just a scraped wing tip and one gear repair.

August


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue May 27, 2008 4:55 pm 
Offline
Senior Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 15, 2006 12:22 am
Posts: 3875
Location: DFW Texas
Pictures of the 109 looking great with the ME-262 over at FC...

http://www.fencecheck.com/forums/index. ... #msg190188

_________________
Zane Adams
There I was at 20,000 ft, upside down and out of ammunition.
_______________________________________________________________________________
Join us for the Texas Warbird Report on WarbirdRadio.com!
Image http://www.facebook.com/WarbirdRadio
Listen at http://www.warbirdradio.com


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue May 27, 2008 5:24 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 30, 2004 9:10 am
Posts: 1536
Location: Shreveport, Louisiana
No sooner did I read CH2TDriver's last sentence did the video of "Black 2" pop up on CNN. Syncronicity. 8) I've never seen a groundloop quite like that one. Did the prop receive any damage at all?

_________________
Rob Mears
'Surviving Corsairs' Historian
robcmears@yahoo.com
http://www.robmears.com


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue May 27, 2008 6:07 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Feb 12, 2005 10:26 pm
Posts: 942
Location: Greeley, CO
Great photos on the Fence check site of the 262 and 109 together in air...can't wait to see something like that stateside...

M

_________________
Mark Morris


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Bad luck
PostPosted: Tue May 27, 2008 6:35 pm 
Offline
Probationary Member

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 7:53 pm
Posts: 3803
Location: Aspen, CO
Its sad to see another landing problem with a 109. It is so great to see such a historic fighter flying.

Charles, what do you mean by your comment about the Spitfire "getting tired"? The were produced until 1950 and use by the RAF into the late 50s, as well as other countries. On the day WWII ended they were still as good or better than any other piston fighter, except for range. What fighter do you consider was fresher?

_________________
Bill Greenwood
Spitfire N308WK


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue May 27, 2008 9:49 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2005 9:44 am
Posts: 163
was the right leg fully down ? looked like it wasnt from the cnn vid .
We had a Viking do the same here , it was back in the air in 24hours!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue May 27, 2008 10:13 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 27, 2005 10:51 pm
Posts: 4673
Location: Cheshire, CT
I agree. It looks like the right main wasn't in the full extended position from the CNN video. As soon as weight is put on it it begins to slowly fold.
Jerry

_________________
"Always remember that, when you enter the ocean or the forest, you are no longer at the top of the food chain."


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue May 27, 2008 10:39 pm 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club

Joined: Fri Sep 21, 2007 6:25 pm
Posts: 2760
For those of you who haven't seen the video, here it is:

http://www.cnn.com/video/#/video/world/ ... ideosearch

How bizarre. Does anybody know how the gear indicators are on the 109? Is it a light in the cockpit, or some kind of mechanical pole out on the wing?

I agree, it looks like the gear was in transit or it never locked down just prior to touchdown.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue May 27, 2008 10:55 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 28, 2005 10:01 am
Posts: 1126
Location: Post-Confederate People's Republic of Alabamastan, Suh!
corsair166b wrote:
Never did understand why ol' Willy did'nt change the gear around . . .



Image

"This question of yours, I can answer quite easily: I design this aircraft to fly . . . not to roll on the ground. Next question!"

_________________
Website: http://www.wademeyersart.com
Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/Wade.Meyers.Studios

Image


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 37 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 102 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group