Warbird Information Exchange

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this site are the responsibility of the poster and do not reflect the views of the management.
It is currently Sun Jun 29, 2025 2:57 am

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Classic Wings Magazine WWII Naval Aviation Research Pacific Luftwaffe Resource Center
When Hollywood Ruled The Skies - Volumes 1 through 4 by Bruce Oriss


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 51 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri May 30, 2008 12:40 pm 
Offline
Co-MVP - 2006
User avatar

Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2005 10:39 am
Posts: 4468
Location: Midland, TX Yee-haw.
There seems to be a bunch of thought that my feelings got hurt with this conversation somehow. That's not the case at all. My feelings aren't hurt, as anyone is entitled to their opinion. I do, however, get frustrated with this same ol' argument, over and over and over and over.

Yes, the CF has a B-24J that was built for the British, or whatever. It's true that theirs has all the bells & whistles, and even a new surprise that'll surely "trump" the CAF in their view. Personally, I think that the CF has a fantastic collection of aircraft, with a few darn good folks, a few a-holes, and a bunch of people in between associated with them....kind of like the CAF. Whether they want to admit it or not, they're very much like the CAF...some people love 'em, some people hate 'em.

The CAF's B-24 was initially built as a B-24A, then slid over to the LB-30 line and modified to fill the role for the French initially, then being delivered to the British. It's not a far stretch to say that's about how the CF B-24 was done, if I understand it correctly. Oh, and the primary differences between an LB30 and B-24A?.........Guns and radios. That's pretty much it.

Kind of like Republicans and Democrats, Cats and Dogs, or Mechanics and Pilots, this will surely be a source for perpetual argument. Nobody has to "buy what I'm saying" or anything like that. We're just trying to honor our vets with our B-24, just like the CF does with theirs.

So, no feelings hurt here. I'm all for agreeing to disagree and just move on.

Gary


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri May 30, 2008 2:07 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 03, 2007 3:22 pm
Posts: 1776
Location: Seattle
retroaviation wrote:
There seems to be a bunch of thought that my feelings got hurt with this conversation somehow. That's not the case at all. My feelings aren't hurt, as anyone is entitled to their opinion. I do, however, get frustrated with this same ol' argument, over and over and over and over.

Yes, the CF has a B-24J that was built for the British, or whatever. It's true that theirs has all the bells & whistles, and even a new surprise that'll surely "trump" the CAF in their view. Personally, I think that the CF has a fantastic collection of aircraft, with a few darn good folks, a few a-holes, and a bunch of people in between associated with them....kind of like the CAF. Whether they want to admit it or not, they're very much like the CAF...some people love 'em, some people hate 'em.

The CAF's B-24 was initially built as a B-24A, then slid over to the LB-30 line and modified to fill the role for the French initially, then being delivered to the British. It's not a far stretch to say that's about how the CF B-24 was done, if I understand it correctly. Oh, and the primary differences between an LB30 and B-24A?.........Guns and radios. That's pretty much it.

Kind of like Republicans and Democrats, Cats and Dogs, or Mechanics and Pilots, this will surely be a source for perpetual argument. Nobody has to "buy what I'm saying" or anything like that. We're just trying to honor our vets with our B-24, just like the CF does with theirs.

So, no feelings hurt here. I'm all for agreeing to disagree and just move on.

Gary


Well I hope to see the only B-24 flying in the world in Oshkosh again this summer!!!

Image

_________________
-Al Sauer
http://www.flickr.com/photos/spookythecat


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri May 30, 2008 2:39 pm 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club

Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2007 11:27 am
Posts: 2463
Location: Ellerslie Georgia, USA
Right Arm.. :D ..er On 8)

_________________
Kind Regards,
Gary Lewis
J.A.F.O.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri May 30, 2008 5:04 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 8:15 pm
Posts: 833
very nice pic


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri May 30, 2008 5:58 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 03, 2007 3:22 pm
Posts: 1776
Location: Seattle
armyjunk2 wrote:
very nice pic


Thanks. I was hoping is would help soothe the savage beasts. :lol:

_________________
-Al Sauer
http://www.flickr.com/photos/spookythecat


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri May 30, 2008 10:59 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jul 25, 2004 11:27 pm
Posts: 252
Ok guys I want to try to put this discussion to an end. I am in the "younger" generation who truly love to see Warbirds fly, heck I run outside when I hear a round engine in the distance to see what it is. Anyways I like CF as well as CAF and I say Ol 927 is a B-24A and there are TWO B-24s, CF can say they have the only one but for me being a round engine lover who needs techicallitys?? I just want to see them fly for a long time. Now back to the regular warbird discussion and lets not use technicallitys and keep them flying!


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 51 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 24 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group