Warbird Information Exchange

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this site are the responsibility of the poster and do not reflect the views of the management.
It is currently Fri Jun 20, 2025 1:44 pm

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Classic Wings Magazine WWII Naval Aviation Research Pacific Luftwaffe Resource Center
When Hollywood Ruled The Skies - Volumes 1 through 4 by Bruce Oriss


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 24 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jun 12, 2008 4:41 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Feb 08, 2007 6:31 pm
Posts: 555
Location: Seattle, WA
True...but whatever it's title, it's weight. Can't drop it or shoot it at the enemy, cost's fuel and performance to haul it, and the more moving parts it has, the more maintenance and parts will be required to keep it working.

--Tom


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jun 12, 2008 4:55 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 08, 2007 11:05 pm
Posts: 656
I agree the STOL version is going to be a nightmare,but thats the capabilities the Marines wanted.I was a little shocked when Lockheed got the contract, seeing they just won the f22 years before that, It was close must have been political?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jun 12, 2008 5:14 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Feb 08, 2007 6:31 pm
Posts: 555
Location: Seattle, WA
kenlyco wrote:
I agree the STOL version is going to be a nightmare,but thats the capabilities the Marines wanted.I was a little shocked when Lockheed got the contract, seeing they just won the f22 years before that, It was close must have been political?



Think so. If I remember correctly, according to the numbers in AvWeek, the Boeing outperformed the F-35. So something else was going on. But it'll be a great jet no doubt. Lockheed Martin knows what they're doing...congrats to those folks for first flight! Kenlyco, that's a great engine run flick you linked...gotta send that one around to my buds. Thanks!

--Tom


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jun 12, 2008 5:36 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 18, 2006 12:38 pm
Posts: 1274
Location: Oshkosh, Wisconsin
I don't care what it looks like, as long as it does its job and we taxpayers get what we're paying for! :wink:

Zack

_________________
Curator - EAA Aviation Museum, Oshkosh, WI
"Let No Story Go Untold!"
http://www.timelessvoices.org


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jun 12, 2008 8:48 pm 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jul 31, 2005 7:28 pm
Posts: 2184
Location: Waukesha, WI
kenlyco wrote:
What are you smoking,this is one badass looking bird!!
Image


How can you not love a bazillion dollar bird that has "ears". :shock: That take off roll was, what 15 feet?

Wait, is there a pilot in there???

_________________
"There are old pilots and bold pilots but few old, bold pilots."


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jun 13, 2008 11:19 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Nov 15, 2004 10:26 pm
Posts: 82
Location: Melbourne/Victoria/Australia
Sasquatch wrote:
True...like the A-6 Intruder, F-8 Crusader and A-7 Corsair II...all sailor scooperuppers. Best negative comment I heard about the jet was that the Pentagon insiders derisively called it the "Monica Lewinski". I still liked it better than the F-35, especially in the VSTOL version. That version of the F-35 will be hauling around an extra jet engine, something the Boeing doesn't need to do.

--Tom


Yep she is one FUGLY :shock:

But I thought the Harrier was ugly to start with, H'mmm nice Jet's since since or including 1945 :roll:

The 262 :lol:

A little nice the flyin Rock Gloster job!! :wink:

The Sabre all model's except Dog Nose !

TSR 2 :roll: :cry:

Hunter. 8)

Lightning NAH two ugly.......

Starfighter from some angle's :)

Ardvark.

NOT the Phantom, she's mega Fugly thought to be delivered UP SIDE DOWN :shock:

Some of the french shiit was not toooo bad :twisted:

OHHH liked the ole Skyhawk from some angle's tooo :D

Never the the 117 that's ugly too :roll:

The F-16's, F-18's and Tornado's have grown on me over time, like the Raptor and the Euro fighter and littler french version.

H'mmm and the lastest Flyin Volvos :P , but liked the other two before aswell.

Have I missed any, OH Jezzz yes The Russky's had some nice lookin job's tooo, some fugly like everyone else.........

Have I missed any ??.........2.13 Am here.......MS is meltin mind and body once more, So I gotta crash, " Gut Nacht " Or Good Moaning or mooning :butthead:

Cheerio :partyman: and Tally Ho! :spit

All Far and WIDE!

Ooooooo Roooooo :roo: from Phil :supz: in Oz!!! :shock:

_________________
" There's nothing either good or bad but thinking makes it so."(Shakes baby)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jun 13, 2008 11:27 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu Feb 08, 2007 6:31 pm
Posts: 555
Location: Seattle, WA
Sea Vixen was BE-YOU-TIF-UL! :heart:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jun 13, 2008 4:10 pm 
Offline
Been here a long time
Been here a long time

Joined: Sun May 02, 2004 1:16 am
Posts: 11324
kenlyco wrote:
I was a little shocked when Lockheed got the contract, seeing they just won the f22 years before that, It was close must have been political?
St. Louis lost the contract twice. Once as McDonnell Douglas and later as Boeing. My understanding was that the performance of the Boeing model was good and it was the first to fly, but that it missed the mark as far as the mechanical configuration which was little more than an improved Harrier type design. The Lockheed entry used a lift fan design. Some also say that the uglier plane never wins a competition.

http://www.theatlantic.com/doc/200206/fallows


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jun 13, 2008 5:17 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 08, 2007 11:05 pm
Posts: 656
I can remember when Pratt was competing for the engine contract with GE, all the tests in West Palm ,out at Edwards,2 teams working the YF-22 and another on the YF-23 one Pratt one GE, this would brake, that would brake and so on.I remember GE burning up A motor in there stand It was like being on a football team, each team eyeing each other and talking, if I could write a book you guys would get a kick out of it.So anyway, after reading the link BDK put up I remember the whole plant on the assembly floor when they announced Pratt had Won the contract,needless to say what the reaction was. We all new something bigger was down the road the JSF program, when you work for a goverment contractor the only thing you hope for is job security, because they will lay you off in a second if wallstreet is not showing the #' so when the contract came around for the JSF now we were competing Pratt/Lockheed, Pratt/Boeing All on one assembly area they gave us our security clearance and built two rooms and we went to work I wont say what team I was on.Even today Pratt got to be on the its toe's because GE is still working there engine program .They will build some of the engines under Pratts name just like we did for the F-18.my spelling sucks sorry.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 24 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 275 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group