Bill Greenwood wrote:
There is an excellent article in the current July issue of NATA Skylines, the magazine for T-6, 51, 28s etc.
It's by Paul Redlich who I know only by reputation, but he is widely considered to be a top T-6 restoration and maintenance expert.
It's a long article, but is about types of landings, wheel or 3 point for T-6s. I started a topic about this a few weeks back.
Paul comes out very strongly in favor of 3 pt landings. I am sort of surprised, as so many of the guys like wheel landings. Everyone should read the article, but a brief summary is that the plane is more stable with the tailwheel on the ground. Also the transition phase from wheel landing, tail up to tail down can cause a swing. A key point was that full flaps make a wheel landing less stable as they block some of the rudder effect.
Some types of planes seem to call more for one type of landing. That is you see P-40s make wheel landings, and others like Spitfires are usually landed 3 point. I have always thought a T-6 could do either type about as well, but this article is informative.
I preferred putting the 51 on the mains tail low . Ours was stock and didn't have the cg changes some of the civvies have.
The T6 you can plant 3 point or tail low and I agree with Vlado it handles crosswind a bit better with the tailwheel planted.