Warbird Information Exchange

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this site are the responsibility of the poster and do not reflect the views of the management.
It is currently Thu Aug 07, 2025 3:22 pm

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Classic Wings Magazine WWII Naval Aviation Research Pacific Luftwaffe Resource Center
When Hollywood Ruled The Skies - Volumes 1 through 4 by Bruce Oriss


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 20 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Tue Aug 12, 2008 10:12 pm 
Offline
Co-MVP - 2006
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 01, 2004 11:21 pm
Posts: 11474
Location: Salem, Oregon
Image
Image

_________________
Don't touch my junk!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Aug 12, 2008 10:25 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club

Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2005 7:26 pm
Posts: 4974
Location: PA
Pretty sure #337 is a P-40C.

_________________
Shop the Airplane Bunker At
www.warbirdbunker.com


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Aug 13, 2008 12:38 am 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 07, 2004 2:02 am
Posts: 4704
Location: Yucca Valley, CA
Didn't the second plane collide with the first one while taxiing?

_________________
Image
All right, Mister Dorfmann, start pullin'!
Pilot: "Flap switch works hard in down position."
Mechanic: "Flap switch checked OK. Pilot needs more P.T." - Flight report, TB-17G 42-102875 (Hobbs AAF)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Aug 13, 2008 7:08 am 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club

Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2005 7:26 pm
Posts: 4974
Location: PA
Chris Brame wrote:
Didn't the second plane collide with the first one while taxiing?


yes. And it happened on Dec 8.

_________________
Shop the Airplane Bunker At
www.warbirdbunker.com


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Aug 13, 2008 10:15 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jul 12, 2004 3:31 pm
Posts: 403
Nathan wrote:
Pretty sure #337 is a P-40C.

Hi Nathan,
How is it determined from this photo that this is a P-40C? I have often wondered and am still puzzled. Anyone jump in here as I do need to know.
Thanks,
David


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Aug 13, 2008 10:23 am 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 03, 2004 5:42 pm
Posts: 5749
Location: Waukegan,Illinois
David, What happened to all the planes damaged on Dec 7th? Would they have been shipped back to the states to be scrapped, dumped at sea or otherwise?

_________________
Ain't no sunshine when she's gone!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Aug 13, 2008 10:49 am 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 18, 2006 3:08 pm
Posts: 4542
Location: chicago
This one lived to fly again... 8)

Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: ??
PostPosted: Wed Aug 13, 2008 11:09 am 
Offline
Co-MVP - 2006
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 01, 2004 11:21 pm
Posts: 11474
Location: Salem, Oregon
Quote:
How is it determined from this photo that this is a P-40C? I have often wondered and am still puzzled. Anyone jump in here as I do need to know

The basic difference (correct me if I'm wrong) is that the 'C' had provisions for carrying a drop tank.

_________________
Don't touch my junk!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: ??
PostPosted: Wed Aug 13, 2008 12:55 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2005 8:45 am
Posts: 518
Jack Cook wrote:
Quote:
How is it determined from this photo that this is a P-40C? I have often wondered and am still puzzled. Anyone jump in here as I do need to know

The basic difference (correct me if I'm wrong) is that the 'C' had provisions for carrying a drop tank.


According to a conversation I had with the late Erik Shilling, one of the differences between the B and the C was that the self-sealing on the tanks of the B were on the outside of the tank. He said it looked a little like burlap. On the C, he said the self-sealing was on the inside.

This was one of the major bases of his rather acrimonious argument with Dan Ford over whether the Flying Tigers flew B's or C's.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Aug 13, 2008 1:43 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jul 12, 2004 3:31 pm
Posts: 403
Django wrote:
This one lived to fly again... 8)


Ahhh, Django,
Your assistance is great. That plane crashed on 24 Jan 1942...with BUZZ number 284 on its side, and was serial 41-13297. It was recovered from its crash position in 1985 and returned to the air in 2007.

Note that the BUZZ number and the serial number have no relationship to each other....thus my question about BUZZ number 337.

Congressional Investigation document says that P-40C 41-13337 was in the 44th Pursuit Squadron...yet we have learned the large BUZZ number has no relationship to the serial. What assures us that the plane in the photo with BUZZ number 337 is a P-40C?

Still puzzled...
TIA to ALL,
David


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Aug 13, 2008 2:43 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 18, 2006 3:08 pm
Posts: 4542
Location: chicago
Pat was asking if any survived... this one did. And since it is my favorite P-40 in existence... 8) I supplied a pic. :)

AFAIK, it did a belly landing in Oct '41 and was in a maintenance hangar during the attack (not sure which field), surviving a few more weeks before it's final crash in January.

As for the differences between Bs and Cs... I haven't a clue. :lol:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: ??
PostPosted: Wed Aug 13, 2008 2:45 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club

Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2005 7:26 pm
Posts: 4974
Location: PA
Saville wrote:
Jack Cook wrote:
Quote:
This was one of the major bases of his rather acrimonious argument with Dan Ford over whether the Flying Tigers flew B's or C's.


The FLying Tigers flew neither the B or C model. They flew the Tomahawk Mk. IIB :wink:

Running and ducking for cover! :twisted:


I have no proof that P-40 #337 is a P-40C. But seeing how the roster at Bellows had more P-40C's on it just tells me there is more chance of this being a P-40C then a B. Thats my only thing I have come up with. Silly thinking I know...... :roll: :? :lol:

_________________
Shop the Airplane Bunker At
www.warbirdbunker.com


Last edited by Nathan on Wed Aug 13, 2008 2:47 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Aug 13, 2008 2:46 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jul 12, 2004 3:31 pm
Posts: 403
Django wrote:
Pat was asking if any survived... this one did. And since it is my favorite P-40 in existence... 8) I supplied a pic. :)

AFAIK, it did a belly landing in Oct '41 and was in a maintenance hangar during the attack (not sure which field), surviving a few more weeks before it's final crash in January.

As for the differences between Bs and Cs... I haven't a clue. :lol:


You are right on all points!
Cheers,
David


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: ??
PostPosted: Wed Aug 13, 2008 5:32 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2005 8:45 am
Posts: 518
Nathan wrote:
Saville wrote:
Jack Cook wrote:
Quote:
This was one of the major bases of his rather acrimonious argument with Dan Ford over whether the Flying Tigers flew B's or C's.


The FLying Tigers flew neither the B or C model. They flew the Tomahawk Mk. IIB :wink:

Running and ducking for cover! :twisted:


I have no proof that P-40 #337 is a P-40C. But seeing how the roster at Bellows had more P-40C's on it just tells me there is more chance of this being a P-40C then a B. Thats my only thing I have come up with. Silly thinking I know...... :roll: :? :lol:


Hahaha well I had no dog in that fight so no need to duck. The fact that they were IIB's came up as well and was hotly debated.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: ??
PostPosted: Wed Aug 13, 2008 6:59 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jul 12, 2004 3:31 pm
Posts: 403
Nathan wrote:
I have no proof that P-40 #337 is a P-40C. But seeing how the roster at Bellows had more P-40C's on it just tells me there is more chance of this being a P-40C then a B.

Hi Nathan,
The above is the thinking of a logical mind. I LIKE to hear the gears working! Thanks.

Now to add to the unanswered questions.

We know the 44th PS had a cross section of P-40s:
P-40B:
41-5206
41-5207 BUZZ 341
41-5208
41-5209
41-13319
*41-13320 in repair 6 Dec
*41-13322 in repair 6 Dec
41-13323

P-40C:
41-13328
41-13331
41-13332
41-13337
41-13340
41-13344
41-13367

We know that the 44th sent on temporary duty to Bellows Field for gunnery training. What aircraft were brought to Bellows from Wheeler? Two were in maintenance on 6 Dec so what aircraft were borrowed from other squadrons to make up the difference (this was done, and often!).

On 7 Dec what aircraft were brought in from Wheeler to Bellows to help 'spread the wealth' in case of another attack?

Let's see what happens...
Cheers,
David Aiken


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 20 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google Adsense [Bot] and 32 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group