n5151ts wrote:
as i recall it was in a little better shape when i saw it. now the big question is why let it sit around and rot when they could give it to me and I could fly it to air shows. Heck I'll even doll it up as an air force plane even though I'm a navy guy!
The biggest problem with any of the surviving Enforcer aircraft flying in civilian hands is the cost.
The gearbox that hung on the front of that T55 (Chinook engine) was custom built and had a
30 hour TBO.
So, the cost of flying it around would be phenomenally prohibitive, having that custom gearbox rebuilt after every month's worth of airshows during the summer.
kenlyco wrote:
From what I remember the Aircraft performed ok for taking a chinook Engine and putting it into a mustang airframe.I think the A-10 put them out of buisness though.
Well, sort of. Although the aircraft did well in what it was designed for (counterinsurgency, not "CAS" or "tank busting"), it really wasn't ever a legitimate competitor to the A-10.
Given that the USAF is today looking at the Raytheon T-6B and Embraer Super Tucano to fill the same role, I think it would have been interesting if they'd pursued this idea 25 years ago. I think that a matured and fully developed Enforcer would have been just as effective -- if not more -- that the T-6 and Tucano.