Warbird Information Exchange

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this site are the responsibility of the poster and do not reflect the views of the management.
It is currently Fri Jul 11, 2025 9:22 pm

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Classic Wings Magazine WWII Naval Aviation Research Pacific Luftwaffe Resource Center
When Hollywood Ruled The Skies - Volumes 1 through 4 by Bruce Oriss


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 11 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Wed Nov 19, 2008 2:05 am 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 29, 2004 10:30 pm
Posts: 1131
The turret wasn't safety wired shut this morning as it has been in the past. I noticed it was pretty complete on the inside. Unfortunately, the rest of the plane is pretty much hollow from the tail to the nose. You can look through the holes for the tail guns and see out the pilots windshields.


Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

_________________
Brad


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Nov 19, 2008 6:31 am 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Tue Nov 15, 2005 6:23 pm
Posts: 2956
Location: Somewhere South of New Jersey...
WOW! :shock: That needs to be locked up before some kid guts it. Thanks for the pictures...

_________________
"Everyone wants to live here (New Jersey), evidenced by the fact that it has the highest population per capita in the U.S..."


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Nov 19, 2008 7:23 am 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 08, 2004 2:59 pm
Posts: 1715
Location: Safford, Az
Hey Brad, years ago I noticed the same thing and looked inside, like you I was shocked at how complete it was! I had difficulty closing both latches, was one of them still undone?
Also did you see the old pic I had in the "some T-33's" thread of the T-33 on the south side not far from the B-1 line? Did you get a better shot of it or can you for me? Are you already off base? Thanks again.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Nov 19, 2008 2:16 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 06, 2006 11:23 am
Posts: 484
Location: maple ridge b.c. canada
it seems to me that a turret like that should be removed and restored, and a fibreglass replica installed in its place. that turret is amazingly complete in my eyes. surely it could be put to better use than just sitting there waiting to be vandalized. i have no idea what the security is like at the location of this aircraft, but if the o/p was able to get into it its just a matter of time until someone with less honorable intentions figures it out as well. maybe a trade with a flyer ( collings b-24 and planes of fame b-17 comes to mind) that has a turret that is less than complete. its obvious that this plane is going nowhere, so why tempt fate with such a valuable artifact when the rest of the plane is a gutted shell?? my 2 cents....... :lol:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Nov 19, 2008 2:55 pm 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Sat Nov 25, 2006 9:18 pm
Posts: 2275
Location: Vancouver, BC
I second groundpounder's suggestion.

That turret looks like a real treasure to me too.

Cheers,

David M


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Nov 19, 2008 3:00 pm 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 04, 2008 6:57 pm
Posts: 2716
Location: St Petersburg FL, USA
Anyone know a congressman from that district? That is the kind of thing that would grease the wheels to swap out turrets! Or someone high in the chain of command. For a base commander to make a decision like that would sound like a dangerous career move. In their eyes it may be better they do nothing than make a decision like that!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Inside!
PostPosted: Wed Nov 19, 2008 3:09 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 1:01 pm
Posts: 895
Location: St. Louis, Missouri
I say move the turret inside. Just leave it attached to the airplane. :D

Looks like maybe a Briggs built unit. I'm shocked to see how complete it is. I wish there was enough money in the Government musuem system to allow for all of these WWII bombers to go inside.

_________________
Albert Stix Jr.
"Work is the curse of the drinking class"


Last edited by astixjr on Wed Nov 19, 2008 11:46 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Nov 19, 2008 3:15 pm 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 04, 2008 6:57 pm
Posts: 2716
Location: St Petersburg FL, USA
Well, yes moving inside is ALWAYS better, but it would take the place of an operational B-1 or C-130? Even if they did have the hangar space, it goes against years of "Tradition" of weathering planes out at the AFB's main gate! :wink:
If we could just get each base to set up a "little" museum that would be a good educational/PR community thing! Get kids interested in real airplanes not just XBox!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Nov 19, 2008 3:43 pm 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Tue Nov 15, 2005 6:23 pm
Posts: 2956
Location: Somewhere South of New Jersey...
Holedigger wrote:
Anyone know a congressman from that district? That is the kind of thing that would grease the wheels to swap out turrets! Or someone high in the chain of command. For a base commander to make a decision like that would sound like a dangerous career move. In their eyes it may be better they do nothing than make a decision like that!


Hate to tell ya, but as important as these things are to us, Wing or Base Commanders have far more pressing issues on their agendas than ball turrets on static B-17's. This issue is best addressed with the owners of the plane - the NMUSAF, and they are unlikely to let go of that turret. In fact, the NMUSAF might not even be aware of how complete it is. If they were, they might grab it for another project i.e. B-24 Strawberry B. Isn't that turrent currently installed on Shoo Shoo Baby?

_________________
"Everyone wants to live here (New Jersey), evidenced by the fact that it has the highest population per capita in the U.S..."


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Inside!
PostPosted: Wed Nov 19, 2008 5:19 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 12, 2008 3:25 pm
Posts: 64
Location: Southern England
[quote="astixjr"]I say move the turret inside. Just leave attached to the airplane. :D quote]

I'd have to agree, although it is nice for the public to see these a/c outside as 'gate guards' i believe they've served their time at these posts. ww2 a/c deserve a comfortable protected enviroment now (hey, wouldnt you want that at their age??! :wink: )

Replace with something a little 'newer', bring 'em in, promote, preserve and protect in a warm dry hanger.... :D

_________________
"A B-24 was the box a B-17 came in!" - One crew teasing another circa 1944!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Nov 19, 2008 7:20 pm 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 02, 2006 9:10 am
Posts: 9720
Location: Pittsburgher misplaced in Oshkosh
APG85 wrote:
Holedigger wrote:
Anyone know a congressman from that district? That is the kind of thing that would grease the wheels to swap out turrets! Or someone high in the chain of command. For a base commander to make a decision like that would sound like a dangerous career move. In their eyes it may be better they do nothing than make a decision like that!


Hate to tell ya, but as important as these things are to us, Wing or Base Commanders have far more pressing issues on their agendas than ball turrets on static B-17's. This issue is best addressed with the owners of the plane - the NMUSAF, and they are unlikely to let go of that turret. In fact, the NMUSAF might not even be aware of how complete it is. If they were, they might grab it for another project i.e. B-24 Strawberry B. Isn't that turrent currently installed on Shoo Shoo Baby?


It is, and there are plans to swap turrets to get SSB a real ball turret that we hanve already finished, and SSB's real turret back.

_________________
Chris Henry
EAA Aviation Museum Manager


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 11 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot] and 35 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group