Warbird Information Exchange

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this site are the responsibility of the poster and do not reflect the views of the management.
It is currently Sat Jan 03, 2026 11:00 am

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Classic Wings Magazine WWII Naval Aviation Research Pacific Luftwaffe Resource Center
When Hollywood Ruled The Skies - Volumes 1 through 4 by Bruce Oriss


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 27 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Oct 20, 2008 5:08 am 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 11, 2004 5:42 pm
Posts: 6884
Location: The Goldfields, Victoria, Australia
Over the time I've been writing about warbirds, I've noticed that most replica production runs take a lot longer at the late stage of build and the later development after the first flights that one expects from newly restored examples of established types.

Some of that is the new type factor, redoubled, perhaps. There's also issues of company learning curves perhaps, aside from any quality issues.

Can anyone think of any warbird replica batches that have sailed through the certification and flight process?

_________________
James K

"Switch on the underwater landing lights"
Emilio Largo, Thunderball.

www.VintageAeroWriter.com


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Oct 20, 2008 5:30 am 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2007 6:52 pm
Posts: 3417
Location: Wichita Falls, Texas, USA
For that fact, can anyone remember ANY non-large manufacturer built aircraft sailing through certification?

I can think of several aircraft that had problems with certification and it lead the the demise of one due to the delays and several others are still hanging on the ragged edge for the same reason, and these are moderately sized manufacturers, but they don't have the ability to throw cubic feet of money and hundreds of people at the certification process.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Oct 20, 2008 5:46 am 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 11, 2004 5:42 pm
Posts: 6884
Location: The Goldfields, Victoria, Australia
CAPFlyer wrote:
For that fact, can anyone remember ANY non-large manufacturer built aircraft sailing through certification?

Good point! :lol:

_________________
James K

"Switch on the underwater landing lights"
Emilio Largo, Thunderball.

www.VintageAeroWriter.com


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Oct 21, 2008 3:38 am 
Offline

Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 8:08 am
Posts: 247
Location: Arizona
Having known both Jay Thinnes and Claus Colling for a number of years, I can say without reservation that Claus is an honest and extremely hardworking and pasionate individual who has spent a good portion of his life bring back the Fw-190.
The website of Thinnes, "FlugWreck" was created by him to strike back at Flug Werks, it is not worth reading as what is said is BS.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Oct 21, 2008 8:02 am 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 16, 2006 8:49 am
Posts: 1635
Location: Belgium
warbirdfinder wrote:
Having known both Jay Thinnes and Claus Colling for a number of years, I can say without reservation that Claus is an honest and extremely hardworking and pasionate individual who has spent a good portion of his life bring back the Fw-190.
The website of Thinnes, "FlugWreck" was created by him to strike back at Flug Werks, it is not worth reading as what is said is BS.

Indeed, all his talk about Claus's "ego" made me get a bad taste in my mouth. I have corresponded with Claus a number of times over the years about his Fouga Magister. He was (and is) always very kind and helpful to me, even though I am only a little warbird enthusiast and he is a very busy man!

_________________
Magister Aviation
It's all in my book

Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Dec 12, 2008 12:48 am 
Offline
Been here a long time
Been here a long time

Joined: Sun May 02, 2004 1:16 am
Posts: 11330
VCS1 wrote:
With all these "kits" having been delivered I am very curious as to what is delaying progress? Are there just small problems that have to be worked out (as in any aircraft being put together)? Or structural and design problems that are forcing rework and redesign? What is the overall quality of the work that was done? Fit and finish of panels, rivet quality ect? I have not had the opportunity to see a Flug Werk airframe up close, I would appreciate any observations from WIX members.
I just had the opportunity to look at one of these aircraft. In my opinion the quality is very good- the workmanship is fantastic.

However, the kits as delivered were not complete. Some of the original German systems don't lend themselves well to reproduction- the annular oil cooler and air outlet scheme, oil tank, cooling fan gearbox and some landing gear system components for instance, and not enough gear actuator/downlock components were provided to allow the aircraft to even sit on the gear. In light of the above oil cooler system issues Flugwerk also did some firewall forward changes from the original design which seem a bit odd (their oil cooler scheme might not work well in the warmer climates). The Russian engine intended for these kits, although apparently quite good, is difficult to support in the west (or at least the US).

To recap, everything Flugwerk did for the airframe they did very well and very close to the blueprints. The systems were incomplete in the kit (the 10% of the project that takes 90% of the time). Some of the changes necessitated by the unavailability of original system components may not work acceptably as designed- I think that kits were delivered prior to an aircraft actually flying, so some of the deficiencies in the systems designed by Flugwerk may not have been known. As an engineer, it is in retrospect sometimes hard to second guess all the design considerations that go into a decision made by another engineer, so I'll just have to wait and see.

Basically the aircraft is part reproduction and part homebuilt. That is likely why there aren't many of these yet airborne. On a scale of one to ten, with one being "just bolt together and fly" and ten being "dataplate provided, build the rest yourself," I give it about a five.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Dec 12, 2008 2:48 am 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club

Joined: Fri Sep 21, 2007 6:25 pm
Posts: 2760
bdk wrote:
I just had the opportunity to look at one of these aircraft. In my opinion the quality is very good- the workmanship is fantastic.


So, who owns the one now at Chino, bdk?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Dec 12, 2008 1:35 pm 
Offline
Been here a long time
Been here a long time

Joined: Sun May 02, 2004 1:16 am
Posts: 11330
warbird1 wrote:
So, who owns the one now at Chino, bdk?
You know, I do actually get outside the city limits on occasion! If there is one in Chino, I have never seen it.

P.S. I have only seen this one aircraft and cannot vouch for the quality of any other Flugwerk products, nor am I a certified quality control inspector. I don't play one on TV nor am I an expert witness for the purpose of litigation. Thank you.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Dec 12, 2008 3:20 pm 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club

Joined: Fri Sep 21, 2007 6:25 pm
Posts: 2760
bdk wrote:
warbird1 wrote:
So, who owns the one now at Chino, bdk?
You know, I do actually get outside the city limits on occasion! If there is one in Chino, I have never seen it.


I read on another aviation forum that there is a "secret" 190 at Chino now that is "off the radar". Just curious.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Dec 12, 2008 4:53 pm 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 11, 2004 5:42 pm
Posts: 6884
Location: The Goldfields, Victoria, Australia
bdk wrote:
P.S. I have only seen this one aircraft and cannot vouch for the quality of any other Flugwerk products, nor am I a certified quality control inspector. I don't play one on TV nor am I an expert witness for the purpose of litigation. Thank you.

But we note you can keep a fixed smile under pressure. ;)

Thanks for the input!

_________________
James K

"Switch on the underwater landing lights"
Emilio Largo, Thunderball.

www.VintageAeroWriter.com


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Dec 12, 2008 4:58 pm 
Offline
Been here a long time
Been here a long time

Joined: Sun May 02, 2004 1:16 am
Posts: 11330
That's just another emoticon James... 8)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Dec 12, 2008 6:15 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 12, 2006 9:58 pm
Posts: 3282
Location: Nelson City, Texas
There can't be a secret 190 at Chino.............all the secret stuff is in San Antonio by special arrangements of the Secret Owners Association at their last secret meeting (or maybe not). The SOA will let you know if they want you to know (or maybe not)


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 27 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 84 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group