This is the place where the majority of the warbird (aircraft that have survived military service) discussions will take place. Specialized forums may be added in the new future
Post a reply

Wed Jan 28, 2009 11:49 pm

I have an idea!! Was Lady be Good a Ford built B-24? Rebuild it to static at Willow Run

Thu Jan 29, 2009 12:10 am

I'd like to see it recovered and at least displayed in a manner that can honor the brave crews that fought to keep the world free.


Libya has already recovered LBG and are now proposing to preserve it and display it in whats seems an appropriate manner?

mustangdriver wrote:I have an idea!! Was Lady be Good a Ford built B-24? Rebuild it to static at Willow Run


Restoring LBG to an intact static aircraft will destroy its originality and its story, it may as well be a fibre-glass replica painted as LBG in terms of value of the end outcome, it would no longer tell the LBG story.


It is best retained in its current condition through preservation as is or reattaching recently seperated sections without "replacement, restoration or repair".

(Perhaps similar to the Halifax at Hendon - not that I fully agree that is the best outcome in that particular case) and laid out to recreate /preserve its desert wreck status.

That could be done by NMUSAF at Dayton, but would be just as fitting and acceptable to be done at Libya, the crashsite is in Libya, it is therefore a local heritage issue and interest, as well as a US Military heritage interest.

The most powerful value of its display in Libya is to show people outside the USA the great sacrifice of US airmen on their behalf during WW2, (in a similar way the Lackland B24 does more for the commemoration of US Airmen in the American Air Museum in Duxford, preserved undercover, than deteriorating in the open at Lackland)

This issue raises recalls lots of debates including the "restoration" versus "preservation" of the Hendon Halifax and "recovery" versus "wreck preservation" of Swamp Ghost in PNG.

However unlike those two airframes which could be restored sympathetically without significant loss of original material and structure and displayed at least as intact as they were found, the LBG airframe is badly shattered, and its "restoration" would certainly destroy a significant percentage of the fuselage at least.

That would effectively be destroying what LBG is best known for, its crash landing, loss of crew, and discovery years later as a wreck in the Desert, and relegate it either a new metal composite/new construction, or a patched together, "poor imitation" of a complete aircraft.

regards

Mark Pilkington

Thu Jan 29, 2009 12:25 am

Mark, very valid points, I am just trying to kick around some options I guess.

lady be good

Thu Jan 29, 2009 12:36 am

Simualar type of thing happened in Labrador with a B-26,crew crash landed just before xmas, and they tired to walk out ,with out knowing where they were in the first place, all perished, parts of the plane are still there.

Thu Jan 29, 2009 4:01 am

Leave Lady Be Good in Libya. Sure, it would be nice to have it somewhere a bit more accessible, but one of her crew (Vernon Moore) is still out there in the desert. It's known that he was one of the three that got the furthest, some 112 miles if I recall rightly.... and all this on the water out of a couple of canteens.

The really sad part is that when LBG was found, she still had all the survival gear in the dinghies, including water. There's a chance the crew could have survived had they stayed with the plane.

Ric

Thu Jan 29, 2009 4:57 am

P51Mstg wrote:Actually if you look at the second photo PeterA posted above. LBG was recovered by the Libyans and is in downtown Tripoli (IIRC) as in the photo.

When they recovered it they cut it apart into pieces that don't really represent an airplane.

I wouldn't be up for restoring it to "flyable" shape, but it should be restored to look like it did when it landed itself in the desert all those years ago.

Mark H


Not so.

LBG was transported in the individual pieces as she lay in the desert.

I can only assume the 'Oil Industry' assisted with major plant to bring the wing and centre fuselage back in one piece. No mean effort considering the easy option.

The aircraft was in a secure and guarded compound in Tobruk when I took the photo in 2007 and will surely still be located there.

This aircraft needs to be displayed in a secure crash diorama setting and I personally would suggest that the missing engines etc in the US be returned to Libya, as a good will gesture.

It will be interesting to see how all this plays and develops.

PeterA

Thu Jan 29, 2009 5:46 am

Hear, hear JDK. A sensible answer. At least the Libyans are attempting to do something constructive. I get quite upset about PNG though where there is rampant and blatant scrapping of historic aircraft, but no, you can't have them to save as far as the Govt. is concerned.

My 2 cents

Thu Jan 29, 2009 10:05 am

Warbird Kid wrote:But should she be restored?
no no no!! it would be like trying to make the mona lisa beautiful. restore the lady & you'll erase her history. a diorama presentation will preserve her mystique.

Thu Jan 29, 2009 10:18 am

I saw an early morning TV broadcast with the new ambassador from LYBYA in Houston TX (they have established their consulate there) He is lobying the TX oil companies for their technology and expertise on oil exploration. This would be a good time for one of you Houston guys to put a bug in somebody's ear and make the LBG part of the negotiations. Maybe we can get her back. We can argue the restoration crap after possesion is established(sounds like Swamp Ghost don't it).

Thu Jan 29, 2009 11:35 am

If the Libyans plan to display her in that new museum, she should stay there I think.

Thu Jan 29, 2009 3:13 pm

If they want to build a museum and reconstruct the crash site, then that is fitting for the aircraft and the crew. I wish them luck. Now if it just continues to rot away uncared for, then that would be a different story.

Thu Jan 29, 2009 3:23 pm

Well, I'm going to chime in for it staying in Libya.

Ryan

Thu Jan 29, 2009 4:56 pm

I say rebuilt it to flyable :lol: :lol: :lol:

Steve

Thu Jan 29, 2009 5:16 pm

Steve wrote:I say rebuilt it to flyable :lol: :lol: :lol:

Steve


I seriously agree with that. Fly her!! 8)

Lady Be Good

Thu Jan 29, 2009 5:23 pm

This is what Lady Be Good looked like in 1959. The deterioration has been dramatic, maybe unsurprising considering that another 50 years have come and gone.

Image

No matter how you measure it, this is a truly significant aircraft.

Let her rest in peace, somewhere.
Post a reply