Warbird Information Exchange

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this site are the responsibility of the poster and do not reflect the views of the management.
It is currently Sun Jun 22, 2025 1:56 pm

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Classic Wings Magazine WWII Naval Aviation Research Pacific Luftwaffe Resource Center
When Hollywood Ruled The Skies - Volumes 1 through 4 by Bruce Oriss


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 6 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Tue Apr 12, 2005 10:56 pm 
Offline
Co-MVP - 2006
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 01, 2004 11:21 pm
Posts: 11471
Location: Salem, Oregon
Here's some shots of captured Japanese Aircraft for your enjoyment.
Image
KI-45 Twin Engined Fighter at Capt Glouster, New Britian 1944
Image
KI-61 Hein aka Tony at Clark Field PI 1945
Image
another KI-61 Hein at Cape glouster 1944

_________________
Don't touch my junk!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Apr 12, 2005 11:43 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!

Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2004 9:08 pm
Posts: 1437
Very good photos, Jack


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Apr 13, 2005 12:18 am 
Why is it that most derelict Japanese aircraft seem to be missing most of their plexiglass? I've noticed this in several photographs over the years. Even photos of very recently abandoned Japanese aircraft seem to show that most of their glasswork is gone, while Allied types of all nationalities usually appear to have theirs intact, or at least mostly intact. Was Japanese plexi prone to fairly rapid deterioration in the tropics? Jack's Nick picture is a good example.

Dan


Top
  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Apr 13, 2005 5:08 pm 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 10, 2004 4:43 pm
Posts: 7501
Location: northern ohio
a good question & very valid point!!!

_________________
tom d. friedman - hey!!! those fokkers were messerschmitts!! * without ammunition, the usaf would be just another flying club!!! * better to have piece of mind than piece of tail!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Apr 13, 2005 6:58 pm 
Offline
WIX Motor Pool Officer
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 21, 2004 7:56 pm
Posts: 680
Location: Vermont
I don't know if it was prone to deterioation or not, but looking at the number of bullet strikes and other damage on the wings and fuselage it would seem reasonable to assume that much of this particular planes canopy was lost durng a raid on that field.

Just my opinion based on what I can see.

_________________
It's you and me against the world.

We attack at dawn.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Apr 14, 2005 10:21 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!

Joined: Fri Sep 24, 2004 10:11 pm
Posts: 1559
Location: Damascus, MD
The glass used in Japanese planes was much thinner than those used in Allied planes. Thinner glass is more susceptible to the elements and to shattering upon impact, especially when the object impacting it was a .50 caliber bullet, or a piece of shrapnel from a parafrag.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 6 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot] and 47 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group