This is the place where the majority of the warbird (aircraft that have survived military service) discussions will take place. Specialized forums may be added in the new future
Sun May 03, 2009 11:34 am
We will find out in a few months - still not together yet
Sun May 03, 2009 1:15 pm
Was involved in a complete lower tank surface reskining. Sealed with the avgas version of FMS-1044 tank sealant. It's a messy and time consuming job, but won't leak afterwards. We did both dry air and wet checks after sealing. It took touching up in a few locations on tops skin penetrations, but if I remember correctly, it held wet pressure for a number of days before we drained it and started to reassemble the aircraft. It's been a couple of years, but when they are ready to fly it, there shouldn't be any leakage at all.
Wed May 06, 2009 10:21 am
When you take a close at a BT's primary structure it almost makes a Stearman look underbuilt!
Sun May 10, 2009 12:58 am
Here's a link to the guy doing aerobatics in the BT-13:
www.valiantechoes.com
Sun May 10, 2009 1:31 am
Is there either a mod or an STC (whatever applies) that allows you to install fuel tank, instead of having a wet wing?
Thanks.
Tulio
Sun May 10, 2009 7:34 am
I don't think there is Tulio. From what I remember, you would have to divide a tank into three or four sections and interconnect them somehow to get past the internal ribs for the wet wing. It's not a hard job to reseal a center section, just time consuming. The one I was involved in took more time to remove all the zinc chromate paste that was the original sealing material than anything else.
If you do deskin one, unless you build a hard jig, only do one side at a time to maintain the alignment.
Sun May 10, 2009 9:24 am
Dan Jones wrote:When you take a close at a BT's primary structure it almost makes a Stearman look underbuilt!
Now thats funny..........he said "almost".
Mon May 11, 2009 12:17 am
Hi Jeff,
Yep - "almost"!

Can an N3N have it's horsepower tripled and it's gross weight doubled while having part of it's primary structure cut away, or does it just hide in a dark corner of the hangar and sob "I wish I was a Stearman. I wish I was a Stearman..."?
How's your project coming along?
Dan
Mon May 11, 2009 8:14 am
Dan Jones wrote:Hi Jeff,
Yep - "almost"!

Can an N3N have it's horsepower tripled and it's gross weight doubled while having part of it's primary structure cut away, or does it just hide in a dark corner of the hangar and sob "I wish I was a Stearman. I wish I was a Stearman..."?
How's your project coming along?
Dan
Now thats hilarious!!!!! Hide in the dark.
We should be back in the air in 2 weeks after winter maint. Just in time for the annual insp and then were ready to go.
Mon May 11, 2009 8:33 am
Now THAT'S a cool airplane! I wish I had pictures of mine when they were still dusters. I haven't had time to get mine going yet this year either but she's already got three local fly-ins on the calendar for next month so I'll be getting at it soon.
If anybody out there trips over a picture of either N5194N/C-GVTI or N9198R/C-GZAL in the meantime though I'd sure appreciate hearing about it.
Dan
Mon May 11, 2009 7:21 pm
Dan Jones wrote:Now THAT'S a cool airplane! I wish I had pictures of mine when they were still dusters. I haven't had time to get mine going yet this year either but she's already got three local fly-ins on the calendar for next month so I'll be getting at it soon.
If anybody out there trips over a picture of either N5194N/C-GVTI or N9198R/C-GZAL in the meantime though I'd sure appreciate hearing about it.
Dan
Last I knew, N44758 was still forsale with the 1340, a group had taken it apart and did some work to it.
If anyone wants a N3N project, let me know......a SWEET one has just come up forsale..............A/C is in TN.
Mon May 11, 2009 11:06 pm
N3Njeff wrote:Dan Jones wrote:When you take a close at a BT's primary structure it almost makes a Stearman look underbuilt!
Now thats funny..........he said "almost".
When a Sherman has "flying dreams" it's a Stearman.
Tue May 12, 2009 1:46 am
There is a BT-13 project over here for sale. Its complete i believe but its just not together. Last i saw it 6 months ago the fuselage was in the back with the wings.
Tue May 12, 2009 6:47 am
skydaddy61 wrote:N3Njeff wrote:Dan Jones wrote:When you take a close at a BT's primary structure it almost makes a Stearman look underbuilt!
Now thats funny..........he said "almost".
When a Sherman has "flying dreams" it's a Stearman.
A stearman for a sherman...............but a N3N for a battleship
Fri May 15, 2009 5:33 pm
Mark D wrote:We will find out in a few months - still not together yet
Mark, how did you apply it? I have a tank to seal in an armored personnel carrier for a buddy. Did you spray it in? What did you spray it with if so?
Thanks,
Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group.
phpBB Mobile / SEO by Artodia.