Warbird Information Exchange

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this site are the responsibility of the poster and do not reflect the views of the management.
It is currently Mon Mar 30, 2026 4:36 pm

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Classic Wings Magazine WWII Naval Aviation Research Pacific Luftwaffe Resource Center
When Hollywood Ruled The Skies - Volumes 1 through 4 by Bruce Oriss


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 50 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri May 08, 2009 10:34 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 30, 2007 10:10 am
Posts: 49
Location: Tucson, Az
Just don't ask James about the Navy beech 18......

_________________
Losing faith in humanity one individual at a time


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri May 08, 2009 12:47 pm 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 30, 2004 8:11 am
Posts: 2397
Location: Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Quote:
Thanks, it would be nice to see the pic too.

Cheers,


Skeptic James ? :wink:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri May 08, 2009 3:40 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Jan 29, 2005 1:42 am
Posts: 546
JDK wrote:
jamesintucson wrote:
JDK wrote:
BTW, are you sure the underwing roundel had the yellow ring? (Runs, hides...) :hide:

Surprisingly enough, yes. Just proves that they often got it "wrong" at the time too.

Thanks, it would be nice to see the pic too.

Cheers,


Here it is. Page 588, Warner, Graham, "The Bristol Blenheim: A Complete History," Crecy Publishing Ltd., 2005.

Image

By the way, this is a really good book for any Blenheim fans that haven't seen it.

James


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri May 08, 2009 6:00 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 27, 2006 2:10 pm
Posts: 3257
Location: New York
Interesting photo.

So Pima screwed up the camo pattern and roundel locations, but the general concept is more accurate than I expected.

August


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri May 08, 2009 6:54 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Jan 29, 2005 1:42 am
Posts: 546
k5083 wrote:
Interesting photo.

So Pima screwed up the camo pattern and roundel locations, but the general concept is more accurate than I expected.

August


Yes, there are a couple of other errors in the markings and camo. It'll cost about $5000 to repaint it. Send us a check and I'll put the plane into the schedule for repainting.

James


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon May 11, 2009 4:25 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 06, 2009 2:38 pm
Posts: 169
Location: Mount Hope, Ontario, Canada
Here is the paint scheme planned for the Canadian Warplane Heritage's Bolingbroke.

Image

_________________
Canadian Warplane Heritage Museum
http://www.warplane.com
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon May 11, 2009 8:10 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 21, 2008 3:29 pm
Posts: 351
Location: Windsor, ON
Very cool, and great work so far. I got to see the project during the Aviation Expo, looks like you guys have a lot done. Best of luck with the restoration. I'll post some pictures when I get a chance.

Is there an estimated time of completion yet?

_________________
Ryan Orshinsky
Windsor, ON
CH2A - Engineering
rorshinsky@ch2a.ca
http://www.ch2a.ca


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon May 11, 2009 9:38 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 27, 2006 2:10 pm
Posts: 3257
Location: New York
jamesintucson wrote:
k5083 wrote:
Interesting photo.

So Pima screwed up the camo pattern and roundel locations, but the general concept is more accurate than I expected.

August


Yes, there are a couple of other errors in the markings and camo. It'll cost about $5000 to repaint it. Send us a check and I'll put the plane into the schedule for repainting.

James


How do I know they'll get it right next time?

The museum should be asking for assistance in the form of information, not money. I'm no expert on RAF camo and markings -- just one of thousands of guys who could properly research the paint job for a ten-dollar Blenheim model kit. If the museum had posted to Wix or a modeling forum, "Hey, we're painting a Bolingbroke, anybody out there with knowledge of RAF Blenheim paint schemes want to help us get it right?" it would have received many offers of free assistance, a lot of them from people more knowledgeable than me. It's a good tip for any museum seeking to bring the appearance of their artifacts up to ten-dollar-model-kit standards at low cost.

August


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon May 11, 2009 11:21 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Jan 29, 2005 1:42 am
Posts: 546
k5083 wrote:
jamesintucson wrote:
k5083 wrote:
Interesting photo.

So Pima screwed up the camo pattern and roundel locations, but the general concept is more accurate than I expected.

August


Yes, there are a couple of other errors in the markings and camo. It'll cost about $5000 to repaint it. Send us a check and I'll put the plane into the schedule for repainting.

James


How do I know they'll get it right next time?

The museum should be asking for assistance in the form of information, not money. I'm no expert on RAF camo and markings -- just one of thousands of guys who could properly research the paint job for a ten-dollar Blenheim model kit. If the museum had posted to Wix or a modeling forum, "Hey, we're painting a Bolingbroke, anybody out there with knowledge of RAF Blenheim paint schemes want to help us get it right?" it would have received many offers of free assistance, a lot of them from people more knowledgeable than me. It's a good tip for any museum seeking to bring the appearance of their artifacts up to ten-dollar-model-kit standards at low cost.

August


I guess its a good thing we didn't enter it into an IPMS contest then.

It is a matter of the allocation of limited resources and setting priorities. Correcting a couple of relatively minor errors that do not manifestly detract from the display of the aircraft in an otherwise perfectly serviceable paint job comes far down the list below aircraft that need actual physical repairs and paint jobs to help protect them. So, unless there is a specific allocation of funds from some outside source we'll probably get back to the Bolingbroke in 15 or 20 years at which time it will probably have some other little mistake for people to get worked up about.

Anyway, I think we've done enough hijacking of the CWH's thread at this point. If you would like to discuss this further feel free to PM me.

James


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Dec 26, 2009 8:15 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Apr 15, 2009 4:56 pm
Posts: 667
Location: Woodstock, Ontario, Canada
Sorry to bring back an old thread, but I had heard about a week ago that preparations were being made to mate the wing and fuselage assemblies in the very near future. Heck, it could have been done already.

The CT-133 previously mounted on poles in the corner next to the Boly restoration area has been taken down and has been parked with the jets on the opposite side of the museum. (This gives the added room needed for re-assembly.)

So how about an update? :)

:partyman:

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Dec 27, 2009 12:56 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 21, 2009 10:40 pm
Posts: 332
Location: Smithville, ON
The center section is still progressing, and yes the area is being arranged for more room.
The plan is sometime in 2010 to have the center section out and to start the mating ritual! If you want to call it that!
The final spar when last I was in still needed some rivets that were on back order. It's a tough go with those steel rivets! One of the guys on the end of the rivet gun is 84! Walt does a hell of a job!
The jig is designed to fit the wing sections as well, so once the center section is out, and the area is rearranged, a wing will go into the jig.
The entire crew works twice a week (mostly retired guys on Thursday) and Saturday the bulk of the crew is in. A lot of work and fund raising is still needed. The Bristol engines will be a big hurdle to get overhauled.
With patience and determination, it too will join the CWH fleet in the air in the not to distant future.

_________________
Mike

Ah yes, There we were, left engine on fire, right engine feathered...ahh yes,...there we were, ..Screwed! No Kissing!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Dec 27, 2009 8:22 am 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!

Joined: Thu Jan 25, 2007 7:31 pm
Posts: 1142
Location: Caribou, Maine
To what aircraft do the corrugated parts in the last picture belong? Fokker Universal?

_________________
Kevin McCartney


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Dec 27, 2009 10:00 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 21, 2009 10:40 pm
Posts: 332
Location: Smithville, ON
I have a list of the aircraft that are in the storage area in Ottawa, and that seems a Junker J1.
Have a look at the links to see better angles of it.

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/c ... ers_J1.JPG


http://cdn-www.airliners.net/aviation-p ... 132805.jpg

Mike

_________________
Mike

Ah yes, There we were, left engine on fire, right engine feathered...ahh yes,...there we were, ..Screwed! No Kissing!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jan 01, 2010 1:01 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 21, 2009 10:40 pm
Posts: 332
Location: Smithville, ON
OK, RCAF_100 here is your update!
The Bolingbroke is still on track for a mate up of the center section and forward and aft fuselage sections in 2010! The spar has all the metal now, just final assembly of the sections. The angle pieces are all but riveted in, now just the cornice pieces to go.
It will be a momentous day when it all comes together.
I have included some close ups of some of the detail that is going into the restoration.

Image
Aux hyd hand pump.
Image
Trailing Antenna
Image
Wiring Detail
Image
Wireless Station
Image
Bomb Aimers Panel
Image
Master Electrical Panel
Image
Spar Detail
Image
Spar
Image
Fuel Tank Area in Center Section
Image
Cornice Metal
Image
Storage Bag
Image
View to the back of fuselage showing camera mount and flare tubes
Image
Nose glazing progress
Image
Gun Turret Canopy
Image
Gun Turret Seat

All for now, more as it happens!

_________________
Mike

Ah yes, There we were, left engine on fire, right engine feathered...ahh yes,...there we were, ..Screwed! No Kissing!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jan 01, 2010 1:13 am 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 11, 2004 5:42 pm
Posts: 6884
Location: The Goldfields, Victoria, Australia
m charters wrote:
I have a list of the aircraft that are in the storage area in Ottawa, and that seems a Junker J1.

I don't know to which photo we are referring - link? Explanation for those missing it? :oops:

There is indeed a Junkers J.1 sesquiplane (not the J 1 low-wing monoplane) in the CanAv collection, and btw, the company name is Junkers, after Hugo Junkers.

Thanks for the update!

_________________
James K

"Switch on the underwater landing lights"
Emilio Largo, Thunderball.

www.VintageAeroWriter.com


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 50 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 89 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group