Warbird Information Exchange

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this site are the responsibility of the poster and do not reflect the views of the management.
It is currently Sat Jun 21, 2025 6:13 am

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Classic Wings Magazine WWII Naval Aviation Research Pacific Luftwaffe Resource Center
When Hollywood Ruled The Skies - Volumes 1 through 4 by Bruce Oriss


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 25 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Aug 13, 2009 11:03 am 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 27, 2006 2:10 pm
Posts: 3246
Location: New York
RyanShort1 wrote:
k5083 wrote:
I have some video of this in flight at the 1974 Windsor show. In motion, the differences are even more striking.

snj5 wrote:
Do I dislike P-64 replicas? Nope.
:)


I do. Never seen an NA-50 or P-64 replica yet that was anything but vandalism of a perfectly nice T-6.

August

Do you feel the same way about Tora Zeros? :wink: I have mixed emotions about it, but in the end I guess it's ok. I do like Tora Tora Tora.

Ryan


Pretty much. Certainly I'd never have supported converting the Harvards just for the Tora display. The Tora show itself was cute the first time or two I saw it, but a bunch of guys beating up the field in tarted-up Harvards with smoke and pyro got boring pretty quick. I'd rather watch them beat up the field in authentic Harvards with no pyro. But given that Hollywood had already converted the planes, it's as good a use for them as any.

August


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Aug 13, 2009 11:41 am 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Mon Nov 08, 2004 10:18 pm
Posts: 3293
Location: Phoenix, Az
k5083 wrote:
I have some video of this in flight at the 1974 Windsor show. In motion, the differences are even more striking.

snj5 wrote:
Do I dislike P-64 replicas? Nope.
:)


I do. Never seen an NA-50 or P-64 replica yet that was anything but vandalism of a perfectly nice T-6.

August


As far as messing up a perfectly good T-6, The P-64 replica that Carl Schmieder and I built never was a T-6, it was nothing more than a truck load of damaged parts when we started, not even a data plate. There was not a single part that we used that was a airworthy part to start with.
We even used a ground loop damaged wing and cut off the damaged 3ft.

_________________
Matt Gunsch, A&P, IA, Warbird maint and restorations
Jack, You have Debauched my sloth !!!!!!
We tried voting with the Ballot box, When do we start voting from the Ammo box, and am I allowed only one vote ?
Check out the Ercoupe Discussion Group on facebook


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Aug 13, 2009 11:59 am 
Offline
Taylorcraft Racing

Joined: Fri Apr 30, 2004 1:29 pm
Posts: 832
Location: Amorica
k5083 wrote:
I'd rather watch them beat up the field in authentic Harvards with no pyro.


In other news...the Wixlawya team of Jim and August announced today that they have been retained by the Canadian government(*) to protect the heritage of all Canadian build Harvards that have been mangled and manhandled by U.S. private owners and/or Hollywood. Under this program it is hoped that owners of these aircraft that are part of Canada's cultural and economic heritage will voluntarily turn their aircraft over to AirJimL2, Esq. as agent of the Canadian government(*) so that they can be repatriated to Canada and returned to their rightful condition and colour...yellow! If these fake Zeros, NAs, and racers are not turned over to AirJimL2, Esq. voluntarily, the Wixlawya team will be forced to use any and all means, including, but not limited too, fraud actions in U.S. courts, to return Canada's heritage to Canada in its rightful state. Thank you for your time.

* For purposes of this post the Canadian government means the AirJimL2 Foundation for Jim's Flying of Harvards. It is in no way associated with the real Canadian government of Canada.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Aug 13, 2009 12:02 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 30, 2006 5:47 pm
Posts: 226
Location: Ontario, Canada
Hello again Tex-fan. Just a reminder not to believe everything you read - especially on Wikipedia. I haven't gone to read the piece, but there were never 13 of these aircraft built. 6 - count'em 6 only. :wink:

However, having said that, they did have 7 slightly older cousins, built for Peru. These were basically shortened (in every direction) variants of the NA-44 light bomber.

the P-64
Image

the NA-50
Image

cheers
Doug 8)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Aug 15, 2009 12:15 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Feb 15, 2007 6:39 pm
Posts: 138
Location: Appleton, WI
This P-64 isn't a replica. It's the real deal. Engine was changed to an 1820, but the airframe is original P-64.

Check out the EAA website. She doesn't fly anymore, but then again neither does our P-51 or B-25...

http://www.airventuremuseum.org/collect ... _NA-50.asp

Chris


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Aug 15, 2009 1:38 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 07, 2004 2:02 am
Posts: 4701
Location: Yucca Valley, CA
Quote:
This is not even an accurate P-64 as it's cowl was replaced with a Dauntless cowl after it was a civilian.


I think that might be a Hudson or Lodestar cowling with that raised scoop.

_________________
Image
All right, Mister Dorfmann, start pullin'!
Pilot: "Flap switch works hard in down position."
Mechanic: "Flap switch checked OK. Pilot needs more P.T." - Flight report, TB-17G 42-102875 (Hobbs AAF)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Aug 15, 2009 3:43 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 30, 2006 5:47 pm
Posts: 226
Location: Ontario, Canada
The original engine for these six aircraft was a Wright GR-1820-77 Cyclone, giving 875 hp for takeoff, 840 hp at 8700’. In 1949 the lone survivor was fitted with an R-1820-60 which raised the service ceiling for cloud seeding. At one point during her military career, NAA rep Jack Canary okayed a change to an R-1820-77 of 1200 hp, which must have made for an interesting ride. So, she's had her share of power changes, but they have all been R-1820s.

Factory drawings indicate the Hamilton Standard 10' 6" diameter prop consisting of a 3E50 hub with three 6111A blades was the production installation. The current EAA installation is a Hamilton Standard 10’ 8” prop consisting of a 23E50 hub with three 6353A-18 blades.

cheers
Doug 8)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Aug 15, 2009 11:43 pm 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club

Joined: Mon Jul 26, 2004 2:38 pm
Posts: 2662
Location: Nashville, Tennessee
FWIW, Paul Poberezny himself told me that firewall forward came off of a Lockheed L-18 Hudson.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Aug 16, 2009 2:14 am 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Mon Nov 08, 2004 10:18 pm
Posts: 3293
Location: Phoenix, Az
they started with the 875 HP R-1820 and while in service were upgraded to a 1000 HP. I never heard of them having anything larger than that while in service. The replica I helped build had 1425 hp and talking to others that have flown it and a Bearcat said it would run away from the Bearcat from a standing start to about 5500 ft, then the bearcat would catch it. While it was not that fast in a straight line, it would climb like a homesick angel.

_________________
Matt Gunsch, A&P, IA, Warbird maint and restorations
Jack, You have Debauched my sloth !!!!!!
We tried voting with the Ballot box, When do we start voting from the Ammo box, and am I allowed only one vote ?
Check out the Ercoupe Discussion Group on facebook


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Aug 16, 2009 8:19 am 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 29, 2004 9:45 pm
Posts: 1268
Location: Ontario, Canada
A shot of the P-64 at Hamilton, ON with the first CWH Firefly.

Image

_________________
The air resounds from the Rolls-Royce roar!
To an enemy the warning is dire: here only eagles soar,
and the last thing he'll see is a mirrored Spitfire!
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 25 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 61 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group