Warbird Information Exchange

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this site are the responsibility of the poster and do not reflect the views of the management.
It is currently Sat Apr 04, 2026 4:38 am

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Classic Wings Magazine WWII Naval Aviation Research Pacific Luftwaffe Resource Center
When Hollywood Ruled The Skies - Volumes 1 through 4 by Bruce Oriss


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 14 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: ANG Mustang question
PostPosted: Thu Sep 10, 2009 5:41 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Fri Nov 12, 2004 8:51 pm
Posts: 1068
Location: Illinois, USA
This likely has been answered before.....thx in advance:
During the 1950s, some ANG Mustangs displayed their tail serial numbers begining with the numeral zero, ex: 0-473656. What did the zero imply? Were the remaining numbers then the correct aircraft serial number?
Thx again,
VL


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Sep 10, 2009 6:02 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon May 05, 2008 5:40 pm
Posts: 293
Location: Illinois
I know I've read it on here someplace, but since I can't find it this site has a pretty good description of it a bit more than half way down.

http://www.oldwings.nl/content/o0/not_oh.htm


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Sep 10, 2009 6:37 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 24, 2005 10:10 pm
Posts: 4173
Location: Pearland, Texas
Vlado, they used a 0 to signify that the aircraft in question was over 10 years old. I don't know when they stopped doing it.

_________________
"You cannot invade the mainland United States. There would be a rifle behind each blade of grass..."
Admiral Isoruku Yamamoto


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Sep 10, 2009 7:26 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Sep 08, 2008 2:32 pm
Posts: 328
I do recall part of the reason they stopped doing it was because it was often confused as being an "O" vice a "0"


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Sep 10, 2009 7:42 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Oct 07, 2005 9:41 am
Posts: 540
And worse, depending upon what reference you use, even they aren't sure whether it's an "O" or a "0"! Theoretically it's supposedly an "O" for "obsolete".

gale_dono wrote:
I do recall part of the reason they stopped doing it was because it was often confused as being an "O" vice a "0"


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Sep 10, 2009 10:15 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 18, 2006 3:08 pm
Posts: 4542
Location: chicago
Yeah, I'm pretty sure it was a O for "obsolete". Didn't the Mustangs get a W for "war weary" too?

BTW, Vlado, I sent you a pm.

_________________
.
.
Sure, Charles Lindbergh flew the plane... but Tom Rutledge built the engine!

Visit Django Studios online or Facebook!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Sep 10, 2009 10:51 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Apr 09, 2008 9:48 pm
Posts: 842
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
"O" for obsolete or "0"for "more than 10 years old" remains the question. Here is a photo of a C-124 taken in 1963 and it has the subject code. Was it obsolete (?).Well, yes (technically) but at the time it was the only one of its type in the USAF inventory and was backbone for heavy lift. Seems strange that they would have identifed it as 'obsolete' when the C-141 successor had not even flown yet. My vote is for "over 10 years of age".


[img][img]http://i487.photobucket.com/albums/rr240/jdvoss/hrC124.jpg[/img]

[/img]


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Sep 10, 2009 11:26 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!

Joined: Sun May 30, 2004 9:56 am
Posts: 1558
Location: Brush Prairie, WA, USA
JD
That pix looks like the ramp at Kwaj and I saw some come thru there in '72

_________________
GOOD MORNING, WELCOME TO THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Press "1" for English.
Press "2" to disconnect until you have learned to speak English.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Sep 10, 2009 11:56 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 28, 2006 12:56 pm
Posts: 3442
Location: North of Texas, South of Kansas
I've been told that it is a zero for over ten years old.

S


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: 51
PostPosted: Fri Sep 11, 2009 12:15 am 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 07, 2006 9:24 pm
Posts: 1748
Location: atlanta,georgia
I thought it should have been an H on the mustang denoting hair dresser convention. :lol:

_________________
Hang The Expense


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Sep 11, 2009 12:20 am 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 11, 2004 5:42 pm
Posts: 6884
Location: The Goldfields, Victoria, Australia
Part of the dropping of the 'O' or '0' would be to do with the extending length of front line type service these days. In the 1950s, 'ten years old' was a couple of generations old, not viable front like equipment in certain roles, today, there's a lot of ten your old aircraft in front line service; and they are no longer an exception type on the ramp, so their Bu year remains an important differentiator.

_________________
James K

"Switch on the underwater landing lights"
Emilio Largo, Thunderball.

www.VintageAeroWriter.com


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: C-124 Location
PostPosted: Fri Sep 11, 2009 9:42 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Apr 09, 2008 9:48 pm
Posts: 842
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Stoney:

You have a good eye and an tremendous memory as well!! If you go the Photo Gallery porton of this website you'll see my collection of NAS Kwajalein Flight Ramp Photos 1963-64.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Sep 11, 2009 10:54 am 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 9:11 pm
Posts: 3160
Location: MQS- Coatesville, PA
I remember that it is a Zero pertaining to 10 years old or more for age.
W was WW and as far as I know was in the European operations area only. I never learned why something would earn the distinction as many of the same type were still operational at the end of the war.
Rich

_________________
Rich Palmer

Remember an Injured Youth
benstear.org
#64- Stay Strong and Keep the Faith

BOOM BOOM, ROUND ROUND, PROPELLER GO

Don't Be A Dilbert!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Sep 11, 2009 12:56 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 27, 2006 2:10 pm
Posts: 3257
Location: New York
And probably most of you know/assume this, but the reason the "0" for "over 10 years old" was needed was so that the serial number could be interpreted correctly. USAF serials start with the last two digits of the year the plane was ordered, but only the last digit was written on the fin as the first digit of the code as presented. Thus, the C-124 shown above was serial 51-0106, originally written 10106 when the plane was new. After 1961, an observer might have mistakenly decoded it as 61-0106. To clear up the ambiguity, the "0" signaled that the first digit of the serial number was not in the most recent decade.

Later in the 60s the USAF began presenting both digits of the year at the front of the serial number, eliminating the need for the "0". This recognized the fact that many planes in the inventory were by then over 10 years old and quite a few over 20 years old. In such cases the "0" was inadequate because although it told you the plane wasn't from the current decade, it didn't tell you how many decades back to go.

August


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 14 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 59 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group