Sun Oct 04, 2009 8:13 am
Sun Oct 04, 2009 8:51 am
Sun Oct 04, 2009 8:56 am
Sun Oct 04, 2009 9:23 am
John Dupre wrote:It has to be a retouched photograph of one of the 5 engine test beds. Everything about the single engine photo looks identical to the 5 engine one. If anything so fantastic as to remove the other 4 engines had ever been done I can't imagine we would only be discovering it now.
Sun Oct 04, 2009 9:55 am
Kyleb wrote:John Dupre wrote:It has to be a retouched photograph of one of the 5 engine test beds. Everything about the single engine photo looks identical to the 5 engine one. If anything so fantastic as to remove the other 4 engines had ever been done I can't imagine we would only be discovering it now.
Yep, a photochop job. Anyone who is unconvinced should ask him/herself where the main gear would go in a B-17 with no nacelles.
Sun Oct 04, 2009 10:27 am
Sun Oct 04, 2009 10:31 am
b29flteng wrote:Photoshopped B-17
Sun Oct 04, 2009 1:04 pm
Sun Oct 04, 2009 3:33 pm
Mon Oct 05, 2009 6:26 am
Zagi-2 wrote:Rajay's post about the Rutan-designed B-17 got me looking around the web.
Check out this single-engine B-17. Weird! http://www.pointniner.com/2008/08/single-engine-b-17-other-rare-aircraft.html
You may also want to peruse this great online collection of other strange and rare WWII aircraft from both the Axis & Allied sides. http://rareaircraf1.greyfalcon.us/
Just when you thought you'd seen it all...
Enjoy!
PS - Since I originally posted this 2 hours ago, several people have asserted that the B-17 picture must be photo-shopped. I have since conducted additional research, and suspect the picture to be a (fascinating) fake.
See E.G.:
http://www.nationalmuseum.af.mil/factsheets/factsheet.asp?id=2455
and
http://aerofiles.com/boe-b17turbo.jpg (note that the top picture looks to have been taken during the same flight as the picture that started this post (http://www.pointniner.com/2008/08/single-engine-b-17-other-rare-aircraft.html)