Warbird Information Exchange

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this site are the responsibility of the poster and do not reflect the views of the management.
It is currently Wed Jun 18, 2025 6:05 pm

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Classic Wings Magazine WWII Naval Aviation Research Pacific Luftwaffe Resource Center
When Hollywood Ruled The Skies - Volumes 1 through 4 by Bruce Oriss


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 12 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Wed Oct 28, 2009 4:55 pm 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 03, 2004 5:42 pm
Posts: 5748
Location: Waukegan,Illinois
An end of an era! www.chicagotribune.com/business/chi-biz ... 3834.story

_________________
Ain't no sunshine when she's gone!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Oct 29, 2009 3:31 am 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member

Joined: Sat Dec 22, 2007 12:36 am
Posts: 7961
Location: Mt. Vernon, WA.
And they're welcome to those French P.O.S's-I stopped flying United years ago because of their snotty attitudes and pi$$ poor service.

_________________
Don't make me go get my flying monkeys-


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Oct 29, 2009 9:34 am 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 10, 2004 4:43 pm
Posts: 7501
Location: northern ohio
airborne party?? did any one take the time to invite the 2 northwest pilot's who over shot their destination a few weeks ago?? they'd be real celebrities!! they will be dressed as barf bags for halloween :vom:

_________________
tom d. friedman - hey!!! those fokkers were messerschmitts!! * without ammunition, the usaf would be just another flying club!!! * better to have piece of mind than piece of tail!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Oct 29, 2009 10:42 am 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 04, 2008 6:57 pm
Posts: 2716
Location: St Petersburg FL, USA
Stripped and sent for burial in the desert?!? Who writes this crap????? At least in the article itself they said stripped and sent to storage! Do they still teach journalism anywhere? It kind of feels funny to be calling 737's vintage aviation, but I guess that is about where we are with them now! :shock:

_________________
Image
Aviation Illustration Website
http://shepartstudio.com/illustration/


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Oct 29, 2009 10:11 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Sep 01, 2008 10:49 pm
Posts: 198
Location: Etiwanda Ca
seems wrong to me considering that the 737 is a 10 times better airplane than the airbus.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Vintage??
PostPosted: Fri Oct 30, 2009 5:09 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 18, 2008 10:42 pm
Posts: 348
Location: Philadelphia, Pa
Ironic that this article is posted in the "Vintage Aviation" section. None of the airframes United is parking are more than about 22 years old.

Also ironic that they stage a systemwide "celebration" of an event that means little more to it's employees than thousands of layoffs and displacement and or paycuts to thousands more? Contrary to published reports, there are no aircraft on order.....

:vom:
:evil:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Oct 30, 2009 7:41 am 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 10, 2004 4:43 pm
Posts: 7501
Location: northern ohio
[quote="Holedigger"]Stripped and sent for burial in the desert?!? Who writes this crap????? At least in the article itself they said stripped and sent to storage! Do they still teach journalism anywhere? It kind of feels funny to be calling 737's vintage aviation, but I guess that is about where we are with them now! :shock:[/quote

the flight crew was stripped & whipped with a wet noodle :roll:

_________________
tom d. friedman - hey!!! those fokkers were messerschmitts!! * without ammunition, the usaf would be just another flying club!!! * better to have piece of mind than piece of tail!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Vintage??
PostPosted: Tue Nov 03, 2009 11:34 pm 
Offline
Aerial Pirate
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 06, 2004 11:46 pm
Posts: 2002
Location: South San Francisco, CA (next to SFO Airport)
Airplanejunkie wrote:
Ironic that this article is posted in the "Vintage Aviation" section. None of the airframes United is parking are more than about 22 years old.

:vom:
:evil:


I wonder how many of these just got repainted from the TED scheme ealier this year, or were those all Airbus's?

Image

_________________
Roger Cain
www.sfahistory.org
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Stearman/


We must limit politicians to two terms:
one in office and one in jail.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Vintage??
PostPosted: Wed Nov 04, 2009 7:09 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 18, 2008 10:42 pm
Posts: 348
Location: Philadelphia, Pa
Roger Cain wrote:
Airplanejunkie wrote:
Ironic that this article is posted in the "Vintage Aviation" section. None of the airframes United is parking are more than about 22 years old.

:vom:
:evil:


I wonder how many of these just got repainted from the TED scheme ealier this year, or were those all Airbus's?



Ted airplanes were all Airbusses......(what is the plural of Airbus, anyhow?)

_________________
Steve
www.eaglesmereairmuseum.org
www.net2nite.com


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Nov 04, 2009 2:08 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 17, 2008 4:32 pm
Posts: 791
Location: Wiesbaden, Germany
What kills me is seeing them with quickie freighter conversions flying cargo under US Military contract with shady 2 bit operators in the middle east. Still in UAL colors with the logos painted out.
United closed all it's PROFITABLE freight activities cause "not our core business"
But their DC10's old DC8's 737' and 747's are making fortunes for World, Kalitta, etc. etc. etc.
Makes me wanna puke and then give somebody a good kick in the keister.
:axe:

_________________
All I did was press this red button here...


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Nov 04, 2009 4:28 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 04, 2004 8:54 am
Posts: 3331
Ethan wrote:
seems wrong to me considering that the 737 is a 10 times better airplane than the airbus.

Yeah, it's amazing how stupid all the airlines who are lining up to make the switch must be! :roll:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Nov 04, 2009 4:37 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2007 6:52 pm
Posts: 3413
Location: Wichita Falls, Texas, USA
Mike wrote:
Ethan wrote:
seems wrong to me considering that the 737 is a 10 times better airplane than the airbus.

Yeah, it's amazing how stupid all the airlines who are lining up to make the switch must be! :roll:


That would be because the accountants run the asylum now, not businessmen or people who actually have a clue how to run an airline.

That would also be why all of the airlines that have large Airbus fleets are in serious financial trouble too. Then again, the second largest (American) is in trouble not because of what it flies, but how it flies them and how it treats both its customers and employees.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 12 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 4 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group