Warbird Information Exchange

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this site are the responsibility of the poster and do not reflect the views of the management.
It is currently Sat Jun 28, 2025 3:44 am

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Classic Wings Magazine WWII Naval Aviation Research Pacific Luftwaffe Resource Center
When Hollywood Ruled The Skies - Volumes 1 through 4 by Bruce Oriss


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 7 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Sat Dec 26, 2009 6:46 pm 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 11, 2004 5:42 pm
Posts: 6884
Location: The Goldfields, Victoria, Australia
Found this pic while browsing the NASA website:

Image

Website details:
Quote:
Date: 10.01.1940
Title: Brewster XF2A-2 Buffalo
Description: Brewster XF2A-2 Buffalo: The Navy's Brewster XF2A-2 Buffalo benefited from Langley's experience in drag reduction. After initial testing at Langley, it was returned to Brewster in June, 1940, and is seen here in the 30 x 60 Full Scale Tunnel following its return to NACA hands in October 1940.
ID: EL-2002-00619
Other ID: L24843

http://nix.ksc.nasa.gov/info?id=EL-2002-00619&orgid=1

But it looks like a shot of a (presumably trial) four gun wing to me, which I'd never heard of, and I can't imagine would've been much good - weight and spread of fire.

(There's a high res version linked or downloadable at the address above)

Anyone got any details?

_________________
James K

"Switch on the underwater landing lights"
Emilio Largo, Thunderball.

www.VintageAeroWriter.com


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Dec 26, 2009 10:28 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2008 8:52 pm
Posts: 1216
Location: Hudson, MA
I took a quick look at a website that has some pdfs of USN F2A-1 and -2 histories. It appears that the BuNo in the picture is 0451 but the -1 and -2 numbers are in the 13XX and 14XX range. If it is the original XF2A would it have had a number different in series from the production ones?

_________________
"I can't understand it, I cut it twice and it's still too short!" Robert F. Dupre' 1923-2010 Go With God.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Dec 26, 2009 10:44 pm 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 30, 2004 7:13 pm
Posts: 5664
Location: Minnesota, USA
John Dupre wrote:
I took a quick look at a website that has some pdfs of USN F2A-1 and -2 histories. It appears that the BuNo in the picture is 0451 but the -1 and -2 numbers are in the 13XX and 14XX range. If it is the original XF2A would it have had a number different in series from the production ones?



Yes, Serial # for the XF2A-1 was 0451. The same bird was modified as XF2A-2 in spring of 1939.

_________________
It was a good idea, it just didn't work.


Last edited by Dan K on Sat Dec 26, 2009 11:58 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Dec 26, 2009 10:49 pm 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 30, 2004 7:13 pm
Posts: 5664
Location: Minnesota, USA
Some video of earlier tests:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wpst_iOlhzU

_________________
It was a good idea, it just didn't work.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Dec 26, 2009 11:33 pm 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 30, 2004 7:13 pm
Posts: 5664
Location: Minnesota, USA
Image


While searching for an answer to James' initial query, I discovered this up-gunned F2A-3. Might a brace of 20MM cannon (or a 4-gun wing) have altered the Buff's career?

At least it gives the modellers a few, new options! :rolleyes:

_________________
It was a good idea, it just didn't work.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Dec 27, 2009 8:23 am 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 10, 2004 4:43 pm
Posts: 7501
Location: northern ohio
interesting question. i doubt the chubby bugger could hardly handle the the beefed up ordinance size wise let alone weight wise in regard to performance.

_________________
tom d. friedman - hey!!! those fokkers were messerschmitts!! * without ammunition, the usaf would be just another flying club!!! * better to have piece of mind than piece of tail!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Dec 27, 2009 12:39 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Mar 16, 2007 7:54 am
Posts: 314
Dan K wrote:
Image


While searching for an answer to James' initial query, I discovered this up-gunned F2A-3. Might a brace of 20MM cannon (or a 4-gun wing) have altered the Buff's career?

At least it gives the modellers a few, new options! :rolleyes:



Not for the better. It was overweight already.

Duane


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 7 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 36 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group