Warbird Information Exchange

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this site are the responsibility of the poster and do not reflect the views of the management.
It is currently Fri Jun 20, 2025 9:14 am

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Classic Wings Magazine WWII Naval Aviation Research Pacific Luftwaffe Resource Center
When Hollywood Ruled The Skies - Volumes 1 through 4 by Bruce Oriss


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 52 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Mon Dec 28, 2009 8:17 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club

Joined: Fri Sep 17, 2004 9:33 pm
Posts: 4707
Location: refugee in Pasa-GD-dena, Texas
warbird1 wrote:
http://blog.al.com/birmingham-news-stor ... st_64.html

If you look at the article above, you can find reader's comments on it. On the last entry, someone wrote:

"Unfortunately not all the information on this has been put out. He was told before purchasing the plane that he could not bring it back into the US to fly it. It could only be a mueseum piece. He proceeded to buy it and got a temporary permit since he lied to the FAA and said it was only in the country for a few airshows. The cannons were also brought with the plane, that is the reason the ATF involved. More fine reporting by the Birmingham News."


Can anyone verify whether this reader's statement is true or not? Lots of questions on the above statement. First question - why would he be told that he could not fly the Skyraider here in the U.S.?

When I first saw this thread yesterday at about 4pm, the comment appeared to have been
removed. I've double checked and don't find it. (Hope my brain fart switch ain't stuck in ON)

_________________
He bowls overhand...He is the most interesting man in the world.
"In Peace Japan Breeds War", Eckstein, Harper and Bros., 3rd ed. 1943(1927, 1928,1942)
"Leave it to ol' Slim. I got ideas...and they're all vile, baby." South Dakota Slim
"Ahh..."The Deuce", 28,000 pounds of motherly love." quote from some Mojave Grunt
DBF


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Dec 28, 2009 8:39 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Dec 12, 2004 7:27 pm
Posts: 264
Location: Indiantown, FL
EDowning wrote:
Brandon

I can't really answer exactly why, because I just don't know. I have always thought something else was in play with this situation but I don't know for sure, so best not to speculate.


A Fighter is considered a weapon or war regardless of whether it is armed or not. You still need State Department permission to import or export one. The guns were just a bonus in this case.

I containerized a Fighter for export to a different Country many years ago and explained to the Seller/Buyer that they needed State Department permission to export it, but they new better. The ship was stopped at sea, turned around and ordered to the nearest port (another Country) to offload the container, which it did. The container sat on the dock in another Country for over a year until the proper paperwork was submitteed and the export wasapproved by the State Department.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Dec 28, 2009 8:52 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2005 12:51 am
Posts: 325
Having been in the firearms business for several years, and having dealings with the BATFE, I can tell you that importing ANY full auto weapon into the states, without proper paper work, (which is virtually impossible for a civilian) is a prime way to get your rear in a sling. Since 1986 there can be no new full autos manufactured and since 1968 there can be no registration of exisiting guns that weren't registered during the amnesty period of 1968, unless they are for military, law enforcement or some manufacturing instances.
If the BATFE wanted to play hardball it is a 100K fine and up to 10 years in prison for EACH gun found to be illegally possesed. As for donating them to a museum, can't happen as the crime (importation without permits) has already been committed. He should have a museum take up the fight to import them and have them properly demilled.
I do feel very sorry for the gent, but wherever, or whoever, he got the idea from that he could just bring stuff like that in without proper permits will end up causing him no end of heartache.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Dec 28, 2009 9:25 pm 
Offline
Been here a long time
Been here a long time

Joined: Sun May 02, 2004 1:16 am
Posts: 11324
EDowning wrote:
I can't really answer exactly why, because I just don't know. I have always thought something else was in play with this situation but I don't know for sure, so best not to speculate.
I guess I'm just kind of fidgety! I know there is a lesson to be learned, I'm just not sure which one. There are so many ways to get tangled up here.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 29, 2009 5:22 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 21, 2008 2:30 pm
Posts: 251
Location: Dallas, TX
Just what in the heck does everyone expect from ATF/DHS? Do you really expect them to work as they should? We are talking about the government organization that believes (according to its leader) that their system worked perfectly in relation to the recent underwear bomber incident.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Dec 31, 2009 3:28 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!

Joined: Fri May 25, 2007 4:50 pm
Posts: 1028
Quote:
Just what in the heck does everyone expect from ATF/DHS?


I expect that if I want to own a machine gun then they expect me to have the correct paperwork for it.

What is so hard to understand about that?

_________________
Always looking for WW2 Half-Tracks and Parts.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Dec 31, 2009 4:01 pm 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 27, 2007 10:23 pm
Posts: 2347
Location: Atlanta, GA
You guys are right. If there's a protocol to followed and forms to be filled out in an import his big, then you do it. Frankly, I'm surprised that things escalated this far. I assumed the buyer was a smart guy, was working with a top notch broker, and that all involved would perform their due diligence. Obviously, whether the intent was malicious or innocent, the import did not go well.

That said, I'm disappointed that this appears to remain unresolved and particularly troubled by early reports that the plane would have to be destroyed. Surely cool and balanced minds can prevail.

Ken

_________________
"Take care of the little things and the big things will take care of themselves."


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Aug 07, 2010 6:18 am 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 27, 2007 10:23 pm
Posts: 2347
Location: Atlanta, GA
Brad wrote:
Anybody know what finally happened with Claude Hendrickson's Skyraider? Nothing has changed on the website and the entire story seems to have fallen of the table.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Aug 08, 2010 7:30 am 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 27, 2005 3:34 am
Posts: 1021
PinecastleAAF wrote:
Quote:
Just what in the heck does everyone expect from ATF/DHS?


I expect that if I want to own a machine gun then they expect me to have the correct paperwork for it.

What is so hard to understand about that?


It depends on the individual. My Dad was a FFL with a Class 3 SOT. When he died, I secured his extensive collection of firearms. Upon his death I called the local branch of the ATF and informed them I had taken the firearms fromthe empty dead man's house to secure and what forms to fill out. Within a few days the NFA had the paperwork. I was more than honest with them. I found 1 firearm was a dealer sample, and I could not legally own it. I informed the NFA I had the firearm secured with the others (now transferred to me) and was in the process of finding a dealer to sell the firearm to. I was accused of being in illegal possesion of a restricted firearm and threatened with jail. They wanted me to return the firearm to my dad's empty relatively unsecure house. If I did not they would come after me. I thought it was a bad idea to put a firearm in an empty house, especially when everyone knew it was empty, and everyone knew he had a big collection. After many phone calls and discussions we ended up securing the firearm in the local police armory.

If the intent of the law is to keep firearms out of the wrong hands, why have me return the firearm to a dead man's empty house?

If I was also already approved to own other firearms (with the knowledge of that same police chief) why not let me secure that single firearm until sale. I was also told to sell "at any price". I asked "even $1?" and was basically told to sell a $9000 firearm for a dollar.

In some ways I really feel the some of the people I tried to work with enjoyed using their power over me in my time of need and grief.

On the otherhand, they bend over backward for illegal immigrants, yet they gain intense pleasure screwing those of us who actually try to play by the rules and be honest and up front. You would think I was Al Capone.

This whole thing still leaves a bad taste in my mouth.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Aug 08, 2010 9:56 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon May 28, 2007 7:10 pm
Posts: 648
Location: tempe, az
EDowning wrote:

Quote:
I don't know if the French even know what a cannon is for, much more difficult to throw down than a rifle


Whatever your personal experiences and opinions of the French and France are, kindly refrain from posting derogatory opinions about them on this public forum. They are uncalled for, offensive to some, and way out of place here.

Thank you so much.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Aug 08, 2010 10:05 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu Jul 15, 2010 7:22 pm
Posts: 27
michaelharadon wrote:
EDowning wrote:

Quote:
I don't know if the French even know what a cannon is for, much more difficult to throw down than a rifle


Whatever your personal experiences and opinions of the French and France are, kindly refrain from posting derogatory opinions about them on this public forum. They are uncalled for, offensive to some, and way out of place here.

Thank you so much.


Oh Please if you know Mr. Downing then you would understand his humor further more I bet your one of those folks who go up to Mr. Downing and tell him he has the wrong color paint on his Skyraider and that he is running the wrong type of Oil.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Aug 08, 2010 10:47 am 
Offline
Co-MVP - 2006
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 01, 2004 11:21 pm
Posts: 11471
Location: Salem, Oregon
Rob I thought you were just Buzzking over on the Pacific Wrecks forum when you're fighting with Chris ie HVD IV??

_________________
Don't touch my junk!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Aug 08, 2010 11:24 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Sep 26, 2008 8:46 pm
Posts: 256
Location: midwest
michaelharadon wrote:
EDowning wrote:

Quote:
I don't know if the French even know what a cannon is for, much more difficult to throw down than a rifle


Whatever your personal experiences and opinions of the French and France are, kindly refrain from posting derogatory opinions about them on this public forum. They are uncalled for, offensive to some, and way out of place here.

Thank you so much.



jeez, the comment you're so offended by was made almost a entire year ago. anyway it was/ is funny as heck


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Aug 08, 2010 11:36 am 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!

Joined: Fri May 25, 2007 4:50 pm
Posts: 1028
Quote:
On the otherhand, they bend over backward for illegal immigrants, yet they gain intense pleasure screwing those of us who actually try to play by the rules and be honest and up front. You would think I was Al Capone.


The ATF bends over backward for illegal immigrants? :lol:

_________________
Always looking for WW2 Half-Tracks and Parts.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Aug 08, 2010 1:48 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 27, 2005 3:34 am
Posts: 1021
PinecastleAAF wrote:
Quote:
On the otherhand, they bend over backward for illegal immigrants, yet they gain intense pleasure screwing those of us who actually try to play by the rules and be honest and up front. You would think I was Al Capone.


The ATF bends over backward for illegal immigrants? :lol:


No, our Marxist gov't does. NFA/ATF are part of that. They still can't figure out "the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed."

My bigger point is why, when we actually go to them for help in an open and honest way do they try to screw us?

Last I checked, from the POTUS down to the last beancounter, they all work for we the people. I tried to do the right thing in the right way and keep a firearm out of the hands of the bad guys. I was accused of breaking the law and threatened with jail time. All for calling them up and asking how to best secure the item.

I guess I'd have been better off to break the law then beg for amnesty and a DNC voting card.

The gov't does not seem to be there to help the law abiding, tax paying, hard working citizen.

On the otherhand when I mentioned Class III firearms to the NRA (I'm a life member and my dad was elected to the board of directors) they too ran away. I knew the law was I could not keep the firearm, I just wanted to keep it in a safe place until I made a deal to sell for a fair price.

How would you feel if the FAA would not approve your medical, then made you sell your airplane at 1% of its fair market value?


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 52 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 273 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group