Sun Dec 27, 2009 11:42 pm
Mon Dec 28, 2009 8:47 am
rwdfresno wrote:Ken wrote:My uneducated guess is that any colored cowl rings were overpainted and that all a/c were still the standard OD over grey, with Standard insigina and US ARMY under the wings. Looks like none of the prop tips were yellow. At the risk of starting off on a tangent - was that a mod?
None of the photos I've seen yet have yellow tips... however, when I mentioned that to the folks at the Nimitz they were quite sure that they did. I'm sticking with the preponderance of evidence I've seen - the photos.
Ken
I think the evidence does show that the squadron markings were all painted over and I thought perhaps in this process since it was likely hastily done it could account for some of the some of the gray under surfaces not appearing as promiently as it does in earlier photographs of the aircraft. It also appears that hte props were either replaced or repainted between Eglin and hornet.
I think that MOST of the squadron markings were painted over - some of them fairly crudely, but then you have to remember that the 17th BG markings were on the nose, the tail fins, and the cowlings - nothing else. So there would be no reason to spray the undersides.
My other curiocity (and strictly for curiouscity sake) is why and when they were painted. Ryan S said he thought it was at Alameda or onboard Hornet. If it was done post McClellan where the final modifcations were done that would lead me to beleive it was a last minute decision to do so. I'm also curious what those final modifications were. The fuel tank mods were done in Minniapolis. You hear much about the carbuerator modifcations that were done and some say that there was some animocity towads the Navy mechanics at Alemeda due to it being bleeived that the carb mods may have contributed to less range than expected but others say it was likley that the modifications were done at McClellan. This a good example of why I like to see as much evidence as possible since people's memories always seem to vary, especally since these stories have been told and retold over such a long period of time.
I'm not so sure it was a "last minute" decision to repaint stuff - it just wasn't very high on the priority list. They had a window of opportunity, had modifications, and lots of training to do, and some things just didn't get done - including painting out some of the 1941 pre-war War Maneuvers markings still on several of the aircraft.
Ryan
Mon Dec 28, 2009 9:30 am
Mon Dec 28, 2009 9:47 am
Mon Dec 28, 2009 3:59 pm
Pathfinder wrote:[i]And here's the ship after landing in Russia:
Image
Note that it's squadron marking (3) survived all the way through![/i]
Interesting thread. I wanted to repost the "3" photo from above but I am digitally challenged!
If this photo is Russia...why is there another B-25B in the background beside the hanger? Were we already lend-leasing first rate mediums to the Russians in April '42?
FWIW the cowl ring in the "3" photo appears to be bare metal to me...
Mon Dec 28, 2009 4:04 pm
Mon Dec 28, 2009 4:15 pm
Pathfinder wrote:Ryan--
I see three (3) photos....was there supposed to be a fourth? I am familiar with the photo of the York plane sitting on a grass field but don't see that one here....
The LAST photo in the sequence above shows a mechanic in the foreground and the "3" plane as the central object and a second B-25 next to the hangar doors in the distance...
Dave
Mon Dec 28, 2009 5:34 pm
Mon Dec 28, 2009 5:37 pm
Mon Dec 28, 2009 5:43 pm
rwdfresno wrote:Ryan,
Where are pictures 2 and 3 noted as taken? Image 2 looks very much like NAS Alameda but I can't nail down which building it is at the momemt. I think perhaps building 9 at NAS Alameda.
Ryan
Tue Dec 29, 2009 1:45 pm
RyanShort1 wrote:rwdfresno wrote:Ryan,
Where are pictures 2 and 3 noted as taken? Image 2 looks very much like NAS Alameda but I can't nail down which building it is at the momemt. I think perhaps building 9 at NAS Alameda.
Ryan
Pictures 1 and 2 are allegedly taken in Minnesota at the modification center. The third picture I am not sure about, but I tend to think it might be in Florida.
Ryan
Tue Dec 29, 2009 10:59 pm
Tue Dec 29, 2009 11:23 pm
Tailspin wrote:The B-25s had their fuel tanks modified by Mid-Continent airlines at MSP. If anyone in the airport Admin had access to some old pics of MC's hanger/ramp that might provide a clue.
H
Fri Jan 08, 2010 9:25 pm
RyanShort1 wrote:
#4 - We know of at least one other aircraft that had artwork on the nose that doesn't have a widely-circulated "still" of it - that's from a movie capture (if you want to beat me to posting it here, do a search on the afore-mentioned forum on "Avenger")
#5 - It's obvious to me that there is still room for more research to be done regarding the circumstances of the Raid.
Ryan
Fri Jan 08, 2010 9:43 pm
rwdfresno wrote:I came accross some pictures of interest on the http://www.doolittleraider.com website. Most familiar to me but the first one was new to me.
Question #1 Where is this picture actually from? Thirty Seconds over Tokyo?
The image below is itneresting to me for a few reasons. The caption would lead you to believe that this is a picture that was taken on April 18, 1942 of a B-25B taking off from the USS hornet as part of the Doolittle Raid. Something about this picture just doesnt seem right to me. 1. The picture is taken form the perspective that would require the photgrapher to be beyond the bow of the Hornet. 2. The cowlings seem "weird." 3. The aircraft in the picture including those on the deck all seem to have yellow or white cowling rings.
thank youi, Ryan