Warbird Information Exchange

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this site are the responsibility of the poster and do not reflect the views of the management.
It is currently Wed Jun 25, 2025 4:52 am

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Classic Wings Magazine WWII Naval Aviation Research Pacific Luftwaffe Resource Center
When Hollywood Ruled The Skies - Volumes 1 through 4 by Bruce Oriss


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 187 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 ... 13  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Thu Jun 03, 2010 9:03 am 
Offline

Joined: Sun May 31, 2009 10:00 pm
Posts: 56
Location: Bluegrass State
"If anyone else has any pics of the restoration work"

Here's a few:

Image
Image
Image
Image

Wes

_________________
'Tight Lines!"

Wes


Last edited by AFML on Sun Jun 06, 2010 9:09 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jun 03, 2010 3:33 pm 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 03, 2004 5:42 pm
Posts: 5748
Location: Waukegan,Illinois
Nice photos, thanks.

_________________
Ain't no sunshine when she's gone!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jun 03, 2010 3:34 pm 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 03, 2004 5:42 pm
Posts: 5748
Location: Waukegan,Illinois
Misterg97 wrote:
When the 82 was brought into the gallery, she not only had no pod, but no propellers as well. That was a few weeks ago .. last Friday, they were still putting finishes touches on her when my shift ended .. The F-84 is unbelievable as I was able to get up close ..

I have no intentions of contradicting anyone or creating hard feelings ... each and everyone of you have a right to express your thoughts and I respect each and every one ... However, mine are different and from a different prespective ....

"WHAT WAS KOREA"?

A while back, I was asked that question, while volunteering in the Korea section, by a youngster perhaps an early to mid teen .. that question perhaps more than anything in the past 3+ years of volunteering has given me a true sense of the NMUSAF ..

The newly renovated Korean Section of the MFG is about to open ... and what a tremendous effort the staff has put into it .... They call it the Korean War ... not the Police Action as called when I was drafted .. as I walked thru the new gallery while going thru my duties I was amazed by all the new exhibits ... no longer will a visitor be able to go thru the area rather quickly ... It will now tell much of the history that evidently is not being taught in some of our schools throughout this great land ... Yes the planes are still there ... and thankfully, although static, they will help to tell the strory ... And by the way as one who had some time in a C-124 Globemaster, it's kind of a good feeling to see one standing tall and proud .. They had a large impact during the Korear War ... somewhere in my records, I have a photo taken at K-55 (Osan) of both a 124 and a 119 that I had flown in.

"A keeper of their stories" ..

By the way, it took me a few minutes as memories of 50+ years ago flashed thru my brain, but I did answer that question ... honeslty, truthfully and which much sadness.

I urge all ... come and take the time to visit the new Korean Gallery at the NMUSAF ... not just the great warbirds .. but read the stories behind them ..

If you got this far ... this old-timer says "Thanks" .. for listening to my 2 cents.

Thanks for all that info/update Jerry. I will have to get down there and check it out one of these days.

_________________
Ain't no sunshine when she's gone!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jun 03, 2010 8:08 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 06, 2006 11:23 am
Posts: 484
Location: maple ridge b.c. canada
So... excuse my ignorance, but just what was the purpose behind the twin mustang? One or two pilots ? Double the power, but close to double the weight as well ?? Speed , armament ?? Sorry, i really do know nothing about this aircraft other than the fact that it looks all business !


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jun 03, 2010 8:12 pm 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 30, 2004 7:13 pm
Posts: 5664
Location: Minnesota, USA
2nd pilot for long escort missions.

_________________
It was a good idea, it just didn't work.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jun 03, 2010 8:15 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 23, 2007 10:39 am
Posts: 632
Location: "Jersey Guy" living in Ohio
I'll take my small pocket Nikon with me tomorrow and see if I can get a few good shots during my volunteer shift in the MFG. Will take both the 82 as well as the F-84 which I think came out one of the best in the museum. I meant to take the camera last week and forgot but I have put it in my blazer pocket so I don't forget it this time.

_________________
Jerry
S/Sgt. - USAF Radio Operator '52-'56
C-119 "Flying Boxcar" - Korea & Japan

Volunteer: National Museum of the US Air Force (2007-2016)
LTM 381st Bomb Group Memorial Association


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jun 03, 2010 8:51 pm 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 11, 2004 5:42 pm
Posts: 6884
Location: The Goldfields, Victoria, Australia
It's easy to beat up on the CAF and the NMUSAF. At the end of the day, leaving childish 'everything must fly' extremism to one side, they are both organisations busy 'preserving' and presenting aircraft for public entertainment and education (a definite second in both cases) and also giving a more exclusive group of guys a chance to play with cool toys from their youth in different ways. Neither is perfect, neither could do the job of the other - we are in fact lucky to have both.

It's interesting that no-one seems to want to ask 'could the CAF done anything differently to avoid this outcome?' Whatever the merits of the case, there were several actions which could be learned from, but only be looking to what you can fix in your own organisation, rather than pointing fingers at the other guys and avoiding any self-examination.

For a start, the CAF restored an aircraft to airworthy, and then broke it, all on their own.

It's hard to get around the fact that bending the aircraft in a crash was a problem - and a bigger one than just finding a rare prop. Today's CAF is a very different organisation, so that's not a fair current criticism, but I'd hope that the CAF and other organisations would endeavour to figure out how to avoid this dumb process happening again.

Likewise only action within the NMUSAF is likely to change what are seen externally as management issues. External pressure can be applied, but it would need to be a lot more constructive.

Just some thoughts.

groundpounder wrote:
So... excuse my ignorance, but just what was the purpose behind the twin mustang? One or two pilots ? Double the power, but close to double the weight as well ?? Speed , armament ?? Sorry, i really do know nothing about this aircraft other than the fact that it looks all business !

Someone was having a contest with another guy over whose Mustang was better. He reckoned that making it a twofur would win the debate. ;)

More seriously:
Quote:
Based on the P-51 Mustang, the F-82 was originally designed as a long-range escort fighter in World War II, however the war ended well before the first production units were operational, so its postwar role changed to that of night-fighting.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/F-82_Twin_Mustang

_________________
James K

"Switch on the underwater landing lights"
Emilio Largo, Thunderball.

www.VintageAeroWriter.com


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jun 03, 2010 10:47 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Feb 07, 2009 12:05 pm
Posts: 915
Location: ELP
I saw both yesterday. 162 looks really good:

Image

Image

_________________
Had God intended for man to fly behind inline engines, Pratt & Whitney would have made them.

CB

http://www.angelfire.com/dc/jinxx1/Desrt_Wings.html


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jun 04, 2010 7:50 am 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 12, 2006 9:58 pm
Posts: 3282
Location: Nelson City, Texas
Does anyone know if that was a strip and paint or just a touch up?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jun 04, 2010 8:10 am 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 02, 2006 9:10 am
Posts: 9720
Location: Pittsburgher misplaced in Oshkosh
I believe it was a strip and paint. A friend of mine who is also a WIX member that posts in the Vintage area said that she saw the plane outside infront of the shops at one point during the restoration, and that it had no paint on it at all. "Betty Joe" was never moved outside until it was moved into the Cold War Gallery.

_________________
Chris Henry
EAA Aviation Museum Manager


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jun 04, 2010 8:17 am 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 02, 2006 9:10 am
Posts: 9720
Location: Pittsburgher misplaced in Oshkosh
And not meant to negative in any way, but she was pretty rough when it came in. I don't see how they could have just painted the repair areas as the black paint was in rough shape.

_________________
Chris Henry
EAA Aviation Museum Manager


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jun 04, 2010 12:25 pm 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 30, 2004 7:13 pm
Posts: 5664
Location: Minnesota, USA
So, now we have a P-82B, painted black so that it resembles a podless P-82C/D, but with the markings of 46-357, an F-82G with the 68th Fighter Squadron.

In the museum's defense, -357 was one of the MIA crews from the 68th in Korea, so I can appreciate it as a tribute scheme. But (and please forgive me for this) no pod and the incorrect FWF profile give the impression of a rushed job.

I love the museum at Dayton--one of my favorite places in the world. IMO this display doesn't measure up. The Lackland F-82E could be "converted" to a G more easily, accurately, and effectively. Put this one on a pole if Lackland needs one that badly.

_________________
It was a good idea, it just didn't work.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jun 04, 2010 1:10 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 18, 2006 3:08 pm
Posts: 4542
Location: chicago
"Bucket of Bolts" would have made a nice paint scheme.

Do any of the pods even exist anymore? None of the other survivors have them, correct?

_________________
.
.
Sure, Charles Lindbergh flew the plane... but Tom Rutledge built the engine!

Visit Django Studios online or Facebook!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jun 04, 2010 7:03 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 03, 2005 3:57 pm
Posts: 283
Location: Houston, TX
I travel to Midland a couple of years ago and get to walk all around, next to, rub against (lightly), and even smell the P82 twin Mustang. I travel to the NMUSAF last week and can't get within 50 feet of the same Mustang - on my birthday too. From these baseless facts alone, I'll side with the CAF (Civilian Airplane Friendly)! I got to get within .001" of an inch at Midland and it wasn't even my birthday. On my birthday, no closer than 50 feet! OK, had the NMUSAF known it was my b-day, would I have gotten closer? I think not! Send it back, right now, so maybe one day I can get "Oh so close again" and maybe, just maybe, even see it fly one day! Otherwise, take down the ropes/barricades/fences etc.
My $.02


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jun 04, 2010 7:32 pm 
Offline
Been here a long time
Been here a long time

Joined: Sun May 02, 2004 1:16 am
Posts: 11324
What did they do for the unobtanium prop on the one side?


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 187 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 ... 13  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 53 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group