This is the place where the majority of the warbird (aircraft that have survived military service) discussions will take place. Specialized forums may be added in the new future
Post a reply

Re: Dislikable paint schemes and markings

Thu Sep 02, 2010 7:58 am

Absolutely no offense to Ryan, but I'd much prefer to see $3/person donated directly to WIX than to get one plane repainted.

Re: Dislikable paint schemes and markings

Thu Sep 02, 2010 8:26 am

$3 will get you some fishcod Zack!

Re: Dislikable paint schemes and markings

Thu Sep 02, 2010 8:28 am

mustangdriver wrote:$3 will get you some fishcod Zack!


Oh brother!!!! :butthead: :lol:

Re: Dislikable paint schemes and markings

Thu Sep 02, 2010 9:02 am

Steve Nelson wrote:
Barbie III, looks great in its CBI Air Commando scheme with white diagonal fuselage stripes


Speaking of the National Insignia, one of my pet peeves is the way the bars are often applied. Aside from being misproportioned, I often see the insignia painted as a simple star-in-circle with the bars tacked on the sides, like this:

Image
The insignia is actually a star-in-circle, with white bars, and a blue border surrounding the whole thing (replacing the red that was added in the spring of '43) like this:

Image


SN


Found a photo that actually shows a B-25 in the process of being modified to the red border. So I understand now, exactly what you are talking about. Now.., I will be looking for it.., ALWAYS!! Thanks for making me a critic! LOL

Image
Last edited by the330thbg on Thu Sep 02, 2010 9:12 am, edited 1 time in total.

Re: Dislikable paint schemes and markings

Thu Sep 02, 2010 9:04 am

For some reason I seem to remember that the Air Commandos did have a scheme that was OD all over and did not have the underside painted gray. Not sure if I am correct, just that I seem to remember that somewhere before.

Re: Dislikable paint schemes and markings

Thu Sep 02, 2010 9:14 am

RyanShort1 wrote:I'd like to offer an idea here... there's a certain L-5 that I'm aware of that has a hideous non-historical paint scheme mentioned earlier in the thread... We currently have 4995 listed members here on WIX. If half the membership could come up with $3.00 each, I could have the guys at the Alamo Liaison Squadron get it repainted. I'd bet, if we got enough support there, that we could also do something cool, like maybe have the inside of the stretcher area door (not visible in flight like a "tramp stamp") with a nice advertisement for WIX. We could also make a "fake" wartime style bit of nose-art like this:

Image

Maybe we could make it a once-a-year deal to help put an aircraft into decent markings.

Ryan


See, now THAT kind of nose art is COOL because there is a story behind it. Makes it real.

Re: Dislikable paint schemes and markings

Thu Sep 02, 2010 9:44 am

Ryan.......After my initial "shock" seeing the plane many years ago when cared and fed in a different location.... I decided I kinda liked Warbug's paint scheme....it was different and you could find it in a crowd :wink:

Re: Dislikable paint schemes and markings

Thu Sep 02, 2010 10:07 am

Not that there is anything wrong with this... :lol:

I mean hey, she's cared for and flying! (and the stars and bars are right)

Image
http://futurshox.net/aerothumbviewer.php?ireg=N45TX

Re: Dislikable paint schemes and markings

Thu Sep 02, 2010 12:05 pm

mustangdriver wrote:The funny thing is a Corsair in Boyington's markings would be a change. I don't know of any that fly in his markings. I know of a few static ones only. I think it would be cool to do one in his real markings not Lucy Belle which he never actually flew in combat.


I've just seen in a magazine a recently restored F4U-1 (even fitted with a bomb rack), which has been painted in matte and accurate USN finish, a real beauty, just looking good and looking right (so much better than the über-chrommy Mustangs parked near it).

Re: Dislikable paint schemes and markings

Thu Sep 02, 2010 12:10 pm

Very Interesting thread and I thought I would put in my two cents. I am neither a warbird owner nor a pilot, I just like airplanes. Over my 20 plus years in aviation I was just a ground pound or a tube slug as the pilots like to refer to us enlisted maintenance types. I have lived long enough to become an active member of a reunion group, NAS Atlanta Reunion Group, and so now I come to the subject at hand, Warbirds paint jobs.
As part of the reunion group I was contacted recently about a SNJ paint scheme. The owner was interested in painting his SNJ-5 in a NAS Atlanta paint scheme from WW2. Well, the group has over four hundred members and a large archive of source material on which to draw on to aid this man in his task. I searched the archives for photos and talked to three members from that period and supplied the information to said owner. Well, it was not quite what he wanted. First his SNJ had to be yellow not silver with green stripes. Well, I told him that during WW2 Atlanta was a navigation training base not a primary flight training base so the station had no Yellow SNJs during this period. Well, I was told that I was full of bs and he would paint his plane anyway he wanted.
After saying all this, it does not matter how the aircraft is painted to the owners. It is all about them, just like their egos, stock portfolios, trophy wives and favorite colors. If they care anything about history or the veterans that is only a secondary concern. Of course this is my opinion and does not apply to all warbirds and their owners.

Re: Dislikable paint schemes and markings

Thu Sep 02, 2010 1:22 pm

For instance, for the Stinson, this is what I found on Ebay for the past three weeks.

Image

Frankly, why to try to invent fantasy markings, almost always looking wrong and fake, when there are for every WWII aircraft types hundreds if not thousands of cool, amazing, funny, sexy, impressive, beautiful AND REAL accurate markings ?

Re: Dislikable paint schemes and markings

Thu Sep 02, 2010 2:56 pm

This is probably a good place to ask for this:

My local sign/decal shop does great work, I mean really great, and they are but a mile from my shop, but one thing they don't have in their database is the correct font for the US wartime aircraft stencils. Has anybody got a stencil alphabet and number set, either as a file or on paper that I could get a copy of? If I can get it to them then they can just make up the stencils for me right here.

Thanks in advance guys, and I'll throw my own two cents into this threads pot: the airplane we had painted last year and the airplane that I'm restoring right now are and are going to continue to be shiny. The finish is shiny, the zinc chromate colored interior paint is shiny, even the instrument panels aren't flat painted but rather done in a "satin" finish. This because the paint physically lasts longer and it makes maintenance alot easier. I know it's not right and it's not that I don't appreciate other points of view but that's why it's been done that way, and since I'm the guy that pays the bills I'm the guy that gets to decide. However I do have a pet peeve and here it is: restored airplanes where every single interior piece is not only painted the same color but is obviously painted from the same can. The airplane ends up looking like it's been dipped in paint. Though some individual assemblies are/were done this way, the whole airplane generally wasn't, and it just looks really, really weird.

P-40's in Chinese markings with shark's teeth are cool, and I love that Russian B-25. The CAF FM-2 is about as butt ugly as they come and the tramp stamp only makes it worse, but it can park in my hangar and leak oil all over the place anytime it wants to. We'd even give it a bath (which would be made much easier by all the shiny paint!)

:drink3:

Dan

Re: Dislikable paint schemes and markings

Thu Sep 02, 2010 3:03 pm

Regarding shiny paint...I'll be the first to admit I know absolutely nothing about painting full-size aircraft, cars, etc., but being a small-scale plastic modeler, I've got to ask...is there any paint manufacturer that makes a dull coat for full-scale machinery? Something that could dull the shine, but leave a smooth, easy to clean finish?

Zack

Re: Dislikable paint schemes and markings

Thu Sep 02, 2010 3:06 pm

Zachary wrote:Regarding shiny paint...I'll be the first to admit I know absolutely nothing about painting full-size aircraft, cars, etc., but being a small-scale plastic modeler, I've got to ask...is there any paint manufacturer that makes a dull coat for full-scale machinery? Something that could dull the shine, but leave a smooth, easy to clean finish?

Zack



You can get clearcoats in basically any sheen you want, dead flat to high gloss, but they're finicky finishes. Any dull finish is rough (that's why it's dull in the first place) and the roughness is what makes it hold all the dirt and grime and be hard to clean.

Re: Dislikable paint schemes and markings

Thu Sep 02, 2010 3:44 pm

APG85 wrote:I know I'm going to get "beat-up" for this but...

I've never been a fan of painting a plane silver when it should be natural metal finish. It never looks right. Better to go with another paint scheme i.e. OD green, black, (whatever other scheme that type may have worn) than to go with the painted silver look...



2nd that

I'm sure that NMF plane is a beast to maintain and painted is so much easier but still.It just does not look right. And for those for authenticity...... guess what? It's OK for NMF to be shiny :lol:

Image

$0.02
Post a reply