Warbird Information Exchange

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this site are the responsibility of the poster and do not reflect the views of the management.
It is currently Tue Jun 24, 2025 9:38 am

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Classic Wings Magazine WWII Naval Aviation Research Pacific Luftwaffe Resource Center
When Hollywood Ruled The Skies - Volumes 1 through 4 by Bruce Oriss


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 18 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Sun Oct 29, 2006 9:47 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Sep 15, 2005 1:33 pm
Posts: 912
Location: Beautiful Downtown Natick, MA
After 25 years of service, the AF has announced they are retiring the F117 Nighthawk, but have not specified a date. The press release indicates its successor is the F22 Raptor.

Full press release here:

http://www.af.mil/news/story.asp?id=123030185

A question: Not for a minute to take anything away from any of its capabilities, its ground-breaking technologies, nor its combat mission history...however: The AF still refers to the F117 as a "fighter". (Yes, I know that F = fighter in USAF language.)

Correct me if I am wrong, its only mission (or primary mission) is either attack or bomber, yes?? Has any F117 ever had an air-to-air engagement with another fighter??

I always felt that the "F" designation was a budget fiction to get taxpayer funding for two very expensive "stealth" a/c development programs: F117 & B2.

Personally, I like the way they look in-flight. It does not look that good on the ground. And they have been effective in combat.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Oct 29, 2006 9:58 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 04, 2006 6:42 pm
Posts: 627
Location: Akron, Ohio
ww2John wrote:
A question: Not for a minute to take anything away from any of its capabilities, its ground-breaking technologies, nor its combat mission history...however: The AF still refers to the F117 as a "fighter". (Yes, I know that F = fighter in USAF language.)

Correct me if I am wrong, its only mission (or primary mission) is either attack or bomber, yes?? Has any F117 ever had an air-to-air engagement with another fighter??

I always felt that the "F" designation was a budget fiction to get taxpayer funding for two very expensive "stealth" a/c development programs: F117 & B2.


I've always wondered about that whole "F" designation thing too :?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: ???
PostPosted: Sun Oct 29, 2006 10:26 pm 
Offline
Co-MVP - 2006
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 01, 2004 11:21 pm
Posts: 11471
Location: Salem, Oregon
Quote:
I've always wondered about that whole "F" designation thing too

They called it a fighter should they could get someone to fly it. Sort of
harsh but true.

_________________
Don't touch my junk!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Oct 29, 2006 11:42 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 24, 2005 10:10 pm
Posts: 4173
Location: Pearland, Texas
The designation F-117 was used to throw off those folks who follow budget allocations to find out what the next secret project is. 117 was used and was a throwback to the old system. ie: F-4 would have been the F-110 for the A.F. under the old designation.

Interesting note, all of the stab protractors that I have seen, that are used to set up the stab movement limits are marked F4H-1.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Oct 30, 2006 3:05 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 27, 2006 2:26 am
Posts: 199
Don't forget that she could carry air-to-air missle instead of bombs if they wanted her to.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Oct 30, 2006 4:05 am 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 30, 2004 11:44 am
Posts: 3293
Location: Las Vegas, NV
The "F" designation was decided on as the permanent designation after the program went "white" because of limitations on bombers in the START and SALT agreements.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Nov 10, 2010 5:23 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 16, 2007 11:55 am
Posts: 167
Location: Frankfurt, Germany
F-117 flying again!?

Read text to this video:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TvyaG7EIC18

Is this true or not :?:

_________________
http://www.pozefilm.de

Warbird Videos:
viewtopic.php?f=3&t=34289


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Nov 10, 2010 5:50 pm 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club

Joined: Fri Sep 21, 2007 6:25 pm
Posts: 2760
M.P. wrote:
F-117 flying again!?

Read text to this video:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TvyaG7EIC18

Is this true or not :?:


Wow, very interesting! It doesn't surprise me if they are still flying them as all the aircraft are "stored" at Tonopah Test Range airfield - the original place where the 117 was based when it was a black program. What I didn't know is that the Chinese have apparently developed a mock up of the 117 and are developing new missile seeker heads to use against it. So, the "unretired" 117's could possibly be used for OT&E against some kind of countermeasures with the new seeker heads.

I believe that video, btw. The guy that shot that has a long history of video taping unusual stuff at and around Nellis/Groom Lake for many years. I believe his credibility is good.

BTW, there is much anecdotal evidence that the SR-71 continued to fly long after it's retirement, so there is precedence for such a move on the part of the Air Force. A friend of mine, who was a trained military pilot, swore on his life, that he saw first-hand, an SR-71 flying after it's "official" retirement.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Nov 10, 2010 7:54 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 23, 2010 1:22 am
Posts: 300
Location: KTIK
those kids are great. i watch all their red flag recovery vids. gee, maybe the 49th is getting -117s again instead of the vipers that are supposed to replace their raptors ...

_________________
-recovering Viper crew chief
-AWACS driver/soon-to-be A-26 driver
-displaced Philadelphian


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Nov 10, 2010 9:58 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2007 6:50 pm
Posts: 378
Location: Northern VA, USA
warbird1 wrote:
M.P. wrote:
F-117 flying again!?
BTW, there is much anecdotal evidence that the SR-71 continued to fly long after it's retirement, so there is precedence for such a move on the part of the Air Force. A friend of mine, who was a trained military pilot, swore on his life, that he saw first-hand, an SR-71 flying after it's "official" retirement.


The thing about the SR-71 is that since there were so few of the series (including the A-12/Oxcart and the YF-12) and EVERY survivor has been saved, that the individual aircraft service histories are extremely well-documented.

That's not to preclude the possibility that there were some off-books Blackbirds. However, more likely is the possibility that your friend saw one of the several SR-71s that continued flying for NASA after both the early and late 1990s retirements from USAF service, with a true "final flight" occurring in late 1999.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Nov 10, 2010 10:14 pm 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 02, 2006 9:10 am
Posts: 9720
Location: Pittsburgher misplaced in Oshkosh
I said it once and say it again, the Blackbird flew long after retirement.

_________________
Chris Henry
EAA Aviation Museum Manager


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Nov 11, 2010 12:13 am 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 30, 2004 11:44 am
Posts: 3293
Location: Las Vegas, NV
There's a reason the airplanes were sent to "storage" instead of cap't crunch.

_________________
ellice_island_kid wrote:
I am only in my 20s but someday I will fly it at airshows. I am getting rich really fast writing software and so I can afford to do really stupid things like put all my money into warbirds.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Nov 11, 2010 4:11 am 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club

Joined: Fri Sep 21, 2007 6:25 pm
Posts: 2760
Garth wrote:
warbird1 wrote:
M.P. wrote:
F-117 flying again!?
BTW, there is much anecdotal evidence that the SR-71 continued to fly long after it's retirement, so there is precedence for such a move on the part of the Air Force. A friend of mine, who was a trained military pilot, swore on his life, that he saw first-hand, an SR-71 flying after it's "official" retirement.


The thing about the SR-71 is that since there were so few of the series (including the A-12/Oxcart and the YF-12) and EVERY survivor has been saved, that the individual aircraft service histories are extremely well-documented.

That's not to preclude the possibility that there were some off-books Blackbirds. However, more likely is the possibility that your friend saw one of the several SR-71s that continued flying for NASA after both the early and late 1990s retirements from USAF service, with a true "final flight" occurring in late 1999.


He was very specific that they were not NASA birds. He implied that they were "off-book" Blackbirds, or ones that nobody knew about.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Nov 11, 2010 7:35 am 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 24, 2005 10:10 pm
Posts: 4173
Location: Pearland, Texas
Is it possible, that by taking them from Holloman and sending them to "storage" far from prying eyes was a way to put the F117 back into the black ? The world thinks they are retired so the bad guys don't look for them ?

_________________
"You cannot invade the mainland United States. There would be a rifle behind each blade of grass..."
Admiral Isoruku Yamamoto


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Nov 11, 2010 2:40 pm 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club

Joined: Fri Sep 21, 2007 6:25 pm
Posts: 2760
RickH wrote:
Is it possible, that by taking them from Holloman and sending them to "storage" far from prying eyes was a way to put the F117 back into the black ? The world thinks they are retired so the bad guys don't look for them ?


I wouldn't think so. Keeping an aircraft "in the black" is very expensive and the very reason it was declassified back in '88 and eventually moved to Holloman from Tonopah. Tonopah has a few other highly classified "black" aircraft operating out of it, and it wouldn't make sense to take up space and resources trying to hide an old, obsolete, completely white aircraft.

I think the likely scenario is that the Air Force honestly did plan to retire the 117, but when this Chinese 117 popped up on the radar, they probably brought 1 or 2 airframes out of retirement to use for operational testing and evaluation for the possible Chinese threat. I seriously doubt they have more than a couple flying, IMO.

All speculation, of course.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 18 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot] and 28 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group