Sun Jan 30, 2011 1:36 pm
Sun Jan 30, 2011 2:04 pm
Sun Jan 30, 2011 2:14 pm
Sun Jan 30, 2011 2:35 pm
Sun Jan 30, 2011 3:00 pm
cco23i wrote:OUTSTANDING SHOTS!! As I KEEP SAYING, there are more vets reenacting now than when I started in 1980! We are not "wanna be's" BUT "have dones" and trying to keep history and traditions ALIVE.
Scott
Sun Jan 30, 2011 3:12 pm
Robbie Roberts wrote:cco23i wrote:OUTSTANDING SHOTS!! As I KEEP SAYING, there are more vets reenacting now than when I started in 1980! We are not "wanna be's" BUT "have dones" and trying to keep history and traditions ALIVE.
Scott
What he said...
Sun Jan 30, 2011 3:54 pm
Sun Jan 30, 2011 4:06 pm
Sun Jan 30, 2011 8:14 pm
the330thbg wrote:Mudge wrote:Scoff if you like but I, for one, don't care. I'm gonna' do it anyway, thank you.
Mudge the outta' here
Land of the free because of the brave (soldiers not re-enACTORS)
Sun Jan 30, 2011 8:18 pm
Sun Jan 30, 2011 8:28 pm
Mudge wrote:muddyboots wrote:Personally, I think if you are young enough to look appropriate in uniform you should be IN uniform instead of playing army man. If you are too old to look age appropriate, then you should quit play acting and accept you're an old fart and quit trying to be 18 again. I like seeing photos of guys who look age appropriate in uniform, but honestly there's something creepy about it. I hope to god I never see dudes reeacting my era although I suppose somebody will eventually decide to do it. No offense guys, you can do what you want, it's a free country. But please don't think wearing an era appropriate uniform means you know what wearing that uniform really means unless you have served. The only people I judge able to tell me what WWII was like are men who fought it, not some 20 year old playing Saving Priivate Ryan. Sorry if I've offended anybody. Just my opinion.
So what you're saying is, if you're not in your late teens to mid-twenties, don't bother? Sorry, Muddy, but I totally disagree. Not because I do it but because I think it's thoroughly enjoyed by those "civilians" who are in attendance.
We (Mrs. Mudge and I) are constantly being asked to pose for pictures with "civilians", by ourselves and by other reenactors. (It could also be because we're a handsome couple.) I'd be willing to bet that, at least 40-50 pictures were taken at MAAM last year and in '09.
Mudge the photogenic
Who wouldn't want a picture of these two?
Sun Jan 30, 2011 8:38 pm
whistlingdeathcorsairs wrote:the330thbg wrote:Mudge wrote:Scoff if you like but I, for one, don't care. I'm gonna' do it anyway, thank you.
Mudge the outta' here
Land of the free because of the brave (soldiers not re-enACTORS)
why so angry? Why don't you remove the b-29 scheme from your profile? After all you didn't fly it during ww2 or made a combat bombing mission in one , so aren't you just playing a part in a hobby too?
Sun Jan 30, 2011 8:38 pm
Sun Jan 30, 2011 8:42 pm
Mudge wrote:
Mudge the photogenic
Who wouldn't want a picture of these two?
Sun Jan 30, 2011 8:53 pm
cco23i wrote:Things like this makes me think I speak a foreign language. Do you not understand that YES we are portraying a person or group and YES many of us DID SERVE AND CONTINUE TO SERVE. As I HAVE worked airplanes INCLUDING the ones we reenact on then why should I quit reenacting for YOU if the WW2 vets are EXTREMELY HAPPY that we are portraying ground crew and show the public OUR HISTORY. As you keep asking why don't "people serve instead of reenacting", my question is how long were YOU in for? AND what did YOU do in the military? O.K as I am pissed I will close.
Scott